About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Brazil

BR005-j

Back

TJSP; Agravo de Instrumento 0005063-49.2007.8.26.0361; Relator (a): José Carlos Costa Netto; Órgão Julgador: 6ª Câmara de Direito Privado do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo; Data do Julgamento: 15/09/2022, Data de Registro: 16/09/2022

Apelação Cível nº 0005063-49.2007.8.26.0361

Apelante: Luis Tadashi Kameoka

Apelado: Ibac Indústria Brasileira de Alimentos e Chocolates Ltda Comarca: Mogi das Cruzes

Voto nº 16.918

 

 

APELAÇÃO   –    DIREITO    AUTORAL.    Ação    de

indenização por dano moral e material. Violação aos direitos autorais pela utilização indevida de projeto arquitetônico elaborado por rede de franquias Sentença de improcedência. Insurgência do autor. Prescrição alegada pela ré. Inocorrência. Assistente técnico do perito. Substituição. Ausência de irregularidades. Preliminar afastada. Mérito. Projeto de arquitetura de interior realizado pelo autor. Contratação que se efetivou concomitantemente à execução da obra de instalação da loja inicial. Reprodução indevida do projeto original nas demais lojas padronizadas da rede de franquias. Violação de direito moral e patrimonial de autor. Quantificação que deverá considerar o valor do contrato firmado à época. Sentença reformada. Recurso parcialmente provido.