Loi sur les brevets (chapitre 221) (édition révisée 2005, telle que modifiée jusqu'à la loi de 2017 portant modification de la loi sur les brevets), Singapour, WIPO Lex

Texte(s) princip(al)(aux)

Anglais Patents Act (Chapter 221) (Revised Edition 2005, as amended up to the Patents (Amendments) Act 2017)

Patents Act (Chapter 221) (Revised Edition 2005, as amended up to the Patents (Amendments) Act 2017)

THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

PATENTS ACT

(CHAPTER 221)

(Original Enactment: Act 21 of 1994)

REVISED EDITION 2005

(31st July 2005)

Prepared and Published by

THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF

THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

CHAPTER 221

Patents Act

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

PART I

PRELIMINARY

Section

1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Application to Government

PART II

ADMINISTRATION

4. Registrar of Patents and other officers 5. Delegation by Registrar 6. Registry of Patents 7. Seal of Registry 8. Powers of Registrar 9. Disobedience to summons an offence 10. Refusal to give evidence an offence 11. Officers not to traffic in inventions 12. Officers not to furnish information

PART III

PATENTABILITY

13. Patentable inventions 14. Novelty 15. Inventive step 16. Industrial application 17. Priority date 18. Disclosure of matter, etc., between earlier and later applications

PART IV

RIGHT TO APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN PATENT

19. Right to apply for and obtain patent

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

2005 Ed.

Section

20. Determination before grant of questions about entitlement to patents, etc.

21. Determination after grant of questions referred before grant 22. Handling of application by joint applicants 23. Effect of transfer of application under section 20 or 22 24. Mention of inventor

PART V

APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS

25. Making of application 26. Date of filing application 27. Publication of application

PART VI

PROCEDURE FOR GRANT OF PATENT

28. Preliminary examination 29. Search and examination 29A. Eligibility for grant of patent, etc. 29B. Review of examination report, etc. 30. Grant of patent 31. General power to amend application before grant 32. [Repealed] 33. Information prejudicial to defence of Singapore or safety of

public 34. Restrictions on applications abroad by Singapore residents

PART VII

PROVISIONS AS TO PATENTS AFTER GRANT

35. Publication and certificate of grant 36. Term of patent 36A. Extension of term of patent 37. Patent not to be impugned for lack of unity 38. General power to amend specification after grant 38A. [Repealed] 39. Restoration of lapsed patents 40. Surrender of patents

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 2

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART VIII

PROPERTY IN PATENTS AND APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS AND REGISTRATION

Section

41. Nature of, and transactions in, patents and applications for patents

42. Register of patents 43. Effect of registration, etc., on rights in patents 44. Rectification of register 45. Evidence of register, documents, etc. 46. Co-ownership of patents and applications for patents 47. Determination of right to patent after grant 48. Effect of transfer of patent under section 47

PART IX

EMPLOYEES’ INVENTIONS

49. Right to employees’ inventions 50. Supplementary provisions

PART X

CONTRACTS AS TO PATENTED PRODUCTS

50A. Application of this Part 51. Avoidance of certain restrictive conditions 52. Determination of parts of certain contracts

PART XI

LICENCES OF RIGHT AND COMPULSORY LICENCES

53. Licences of right 54. Cancellation of entry made under section 53 55. Compulsory licences

PART XII

USE OF PATENTED INVENTIONS FOR SERVICES OF GOVERNMENT

56. Use of patented inventions by Government and authorised parties 57. Rights of third parties in respect of Government use 58. References of disputes as to Government use 59. [Repealed]

Patents3 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Section

60. Nature and scope of rights under section 56 61. Duty to inform patentee 62. Patentee entitled to remuneration 63. [Repealed] 64. [Repealed] 65. [Repealed]

PART XIII

INFRINGEMENT OF PATENTS

66. Meaning of infringement 67. Proceedings for infringement of patent 68. Reversal of burden of proof 69. Restrictions on relief for infringement 70. Relief for infringement of partially valid patent 71. Right to continue use begun before priority date 72. Certificate of contested validity of patent 73. Proceedings for infringement by co-owner 74. Proceedings for infringement by exclusive licensee 75. Effect of non-registration on infringement proceedings 76. Infringement of rights conferred by publication of application 77. Remedy for groundless threats of infringement proceedings 78. Declaration as to non-infringement

PART XIV

REVOCATION OF PATENTS AND VALIDITY PROCEEDINGS

79. [Repealed] 80. Power to revoke patents on application 81. Registrar’s power to revoke patents 82. Proceedings in which validity of patent may be put in issue

PART XV

AMENDMENTS OF PATENTS AND APPLICATIONS

83. Amendment of patent in infringement or revocation proceedings 84. Amendments of applications and patents not to include added

matter

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 4

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART XVI

INTERNATIONAL APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS

Section

85. Effect of filing international application for patent 86. International and national phases of application 87. Adaptation of provisions in relation to international application 88. Evidence of Patent Co-operation Treaty and its instruments

PART XVII

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

89. Proceedings before court or Registrar 90. Appeals from Registrar 91. General powers of court 92. Exercise of Registrar’s discretionary powers 93. Right of audience in patent proceedings 94. Extension of privilege for communications with solicitors

relating to patent proceedings 95. Privilege for communications with patent agents, etc. 96. Costs and expenses in proceedings before Registrar 97. Licences granted by order of Registrar

PART XVIII

OFFENCES

98. Falsification of register, etc. 99. Unauthorised claim of patent rights 100. Unauthorised claim that patent has been applied for 101. Misuse of title “Registry of Patents” 102. Offences by corporations and partnerships 103. Composition of offences

PART XIX

PATENT AGENTS AND FOREIGN PATENT AGENTS

104. Registration of patent agents and foreign patent agents 105. Persons entitled to act as patent agents, etc. 105A. Foreign patent agents

Patents5 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART XX

MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL

Section

106. Immunity of Office, its officers and Examiners 107. Correction of errors in patents and applications 108. Information about patent applications and patents, and inspection

of documents 109. [Repealed] 110. Extension of time 111. Hours of business and excluded days 112. Government’s right to sell forfeited articles 113. Extent of invention 114. Availability of samples of micro-organisms 115. Rules 115A. Forms and directions of Registrar 116. Fees 116A. Amendment of Schedule 117. Transitional provisions

The Schedule

An Act to establish a new law of patents, to enable Singapore to give effect to certain international conventions on patents, and for matters connected therewith.

[23rd February 1995]

PART I

PRELIMINARY

Short title

1. This Act may be cited as the Patents Act.

Interpretation

2.—(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires —

“Convention on International Exhibitions” means the Convention relating to International Exhibitions signed in Paris on 22nd November 1928, as amended or supplemented

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 6

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

by any protocol to that convention which is for the time being in force;

“corresponding application”, in relation to an application for a patent (referred to in this definition as the application in suit), means an application for protection filed, or treated as filed, with any prescribed patent office that —

(a) forms the basis for a priority claim under section 17 in the application in suit; or

(b) is subject to a priority claim based on —

(i) the application in suit; or

(ii) an application which is also the basis for a priority claim under section 17 in the application in suit;

“corresponding international application”, in relation to an application for a patent (referred to in this definition as the application in suit), means an application for protection filed under the Patent Co-operation Treaty that —

(a) forms the basis for a priority claim under section 17 in the application in suit; or

(b) is subject to a priority claim based on —

(i) the application in suit; or

(ii) an application which is also the basis for a priority claim under section 17 in the application in suit;

“corresponding patent”, in relation to a corresponding application, means a patent granted in respect of the corresponding application by the prescribed patent office in which the corresponding application was filed or treated as filed;

“Council for TRIPS” means the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights established under the TRIPS Agreement;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Patents7 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“country” includes —

(a) a colony, protectorate or territory subject to the authority or under the suzerainty of another country; or

(b) a territory administered by another country under the trusteeship of the United Nations;

“court” means the High Court;

“date of filing”, in relation to —

(a) an application for a patent made under this Act, means the date of filing that application by virtue of section 26; and

(b) any other application, means the date which, under the law of the country where the application was made or in accordance with the terms of a treaty or convention to which that country is a party, is to be treated as the date of filing that application in that country or is equivalent to the date of filing an application in that country (whatever the outcome of the application);

“designate”, in relation to an application or a patent, means designate the country or countries (in pursuance of the Patent Co-operation Treaty) in which protection is sought for the invention which is the subject of the application or patent;

“Doha Declaration Implementation Decision” means the Decision adopted by the General Council of the World Trade Organisation on 30th August 2003 on the implementation of paragraph 6 of the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health adopted in Doha on 14th November 2001;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

“employee” means a person who works or (where the employment has ceased) worked under a contract of employment or in employment under or for the purposes of a Government department;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 8

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“employer”, in relation to an employee, means the person by whom the employee is or was employed;

“European Patent Convention” means the Convention on the Grant of European Patents;

“European Patent Office” means the office of that name established by the European Patent Convention;

“examination”means an examination conducted by an Examiner in relation to an application for a patent to determine such matters as may be prescribed;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“Examiner” means any person, organisation, entity or foreign or international patent office or organisation appointed by the Registrar for the purpose of referring any question or matter relating to patents (including the conduct of any search, examination or search and examination, in relation to an application for a patent, whether before or after the patent is granted), and includes any Deputy Registrar of Patents, and any Assistant Registrar of Patents or public officer to whom the Registrar has delegated, under section 5(1), any of the Registrar’s powers or functions under this Act;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 08/04/2013]

“exclusive licence” means a licence from the proprietor of or applicant for a patent conferring on the licensee, or on him and persons authorised by him, to the exclusion of all other persons (including the proprietor or applicant), any right in respect of the invention to which the patent or application relates, and “exclusive licensee” and “non-exclusive licence” shall be construed accordingly;

“filing fee” means the fee prescribed for the purposes of section 25;

“formal requirements” means those requirements of this Act and the rules which are designated by the rules as formal requirements for the purposes of this Act;

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

Patents9 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“international application for a patent” means an application made under the Patent Co-operation Treaty;

“international application for a patent (Singapore)” means an application of that description which, on its date of filing, designates Singapore;

“International Bureau” means the secretariat of the World Intellectual Property Organisation established by a convention signed at Stockholm on 14th July 1967;

“international exhibition” means an official or officially recognised international exhibition falling within the terms of the Convention on International Exhibitions or falling within the terms of any subsequent treaty or convention replacing that convention;

[Deleted by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“inventor”, in relation to an invention, means the actual deviser of the invention and “joint inventor” shall be construed accordingly;

“journal” has the same meaning as in section 115(4);

“Legal Service Officer” means an officer in the Singapore Legal Service;

[20/2009 wef 09/10/2009]

“marketing approval”, in relation to a pharmaceutical product, means —

(a) a product licence under section 5 of the Medicines Act (Cap. 176) granted before the date of commencement of section 2(d) of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2012; or

(b) a registration under Part VII of the Health Products Act (Cap. 122D) granted on or after the date of commencement of section 2(d) of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2012;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 01/11/2016]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 10

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“medicinal health product” means any health product within the meaning of the Health Products Act that is prescribed as a medicinal health product;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 01/11/2016]

“medicinal product” means —

(a) a medicinal product within the meaning of the Medicines Act; or

(b) a medicinal health product; [Act 15 of 2012 wef 01/11/2016]

“missing part”, in relation to an application for a patent, means —

(a) any drawing; or

(b) any part of the description of the invention for which the patent is sought,

which was missing from the application at the date of filing of the application;

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

“mortgage”, when used as a noun, includes a charge for securing money or money’s worth and, when used as a verb, shall be construed accordingly;

“Office” means the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore incorporated under the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Act (Cap. 140);

“Paris Convention” means the Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property signed at Paris on 20th March 1883;

“patent” means a patent under this Act and includes a patent in force by virtue of section 117(3);

“Patent Co-operation Treaty” means the treaty of that name signed at Washington on 19th June 1970;

“patented invention” means an invention for which a patent is granted and “patented process” shall be construed accordingly;

Patents11 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“patented product” means a product which is a patented invention or, in relation to a patented process, a product obtained directly by means of the process or to which the process has been applied;

“person” includes the Government;

“pharmaceutical product” means a medicinal product which is a substance used wholly or mainly by being administered to a human being for the purpose of treating or preventing disease, but does not include —

(a) any substance which is used solely —

(i) for diagnosis or testing; or

(ii) as a device or mechanism, or an instrument, apparatus or appliance; or

(b) any substance or class of substances specified in paragraph 2 or 3 of the Schedule;

“prescribed form”means a form published by the Registrar under section 115A;

“priority date” means the date determined as such under section 17;

“published” means made available to the public (whether in Singapore or elsewhere) and a document shall be taken to be published under any provision of this Act if it can be inspected as of right at any place in Singapore by members of the public, whether on payment of a fee or not, and “republished” shall be construed accordingly;

“register”, when used as a noun, means the register of patents maintained under section 42 and, when used as a verb, means, in relation to any thing, to register or register particulars, or enter notice, of that thing in the register and, when used in relation to a person, means to enter his name in the register;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 12

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“registered foreign patent agent” means a person whose name is entered in the register of foreign patent agents kept in accordance with the rules made under section 104;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“registered patent agent” means a person whose name is entered in the register of patent agents kept in accordance with the rules made under section 104;

“Registrar” means the Registrar of Patents and includes any Deputy Registrar of Patents holding office under this Act;

“Registry” means the Registry of Patents established under this Act;

“related national phase application”, in relation to an application for a patent (being an international application for a patent (Singapore) that has entered the national phase in Singapore under section 86(3), or a new application filed in accordance with section 26(11) which derived its filing date from an international application for a patent (Singapore)) (referred to in this definition as the application in suit), means an application for protection treated as filed with any prescribed patent office (being an international application for a patent (Singapore) that has entered the national or regional phase in the country or jurisdiction the patent office of which is that prescribed patent office) which is derived from the same international application for a patent (Singapore) (being an international application for a patent (Singapore) that is not subject to any priority claim) as the application in suit;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

“related national phase patent”, in relation to a related national phase application, means a patent granted in respect of the related national phase application by the prescribed patent office in which the related national phase application was treated as filed;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents13 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“relevant authority”, in relation to a pharmaceutical product, means the Health Sciences Authority established under the Health Sciences Authority Act (Cap. 122C);

“relevant health product” means a patented invention which is a product referred to in —

(a) paragraph 1(a) of the Doha Declaration Implementation Decision; or

(b) paragraph 1(a) of the Annex to the TRIPS Agreement;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

“right”, in relation to any patent or application, includes an interest in the patent or application and, without prejudice to the foregoing, any reference to a right in a patent includes a reference to a share in the patent;

“scientific adviser” means any person with any scientific qualification, any medical practitioner, engineer, architect, surveyor, accountant, actuary and any other specially skilled person;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

“search”means a search conducted by an Examiner in relation to an application for a patent to discover such matters as may be prescribed;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“supplementary examination” means a supplementary examination conducted by an Examiner in relation to an application for a patent to determine such matters as may be prescribed;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“TRIPS Agreement” means the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, set out in Annex 1C to the WTO Agreement, as revised or amended from time to time;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 14

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“WTO Agreement” means the World Trade Organisation Agreement signed in Marrakesh in 1994 as revised or amended from time to time.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

[40/95; 3/2001; 30/2001; 19/2004]

(2) Rules may provide for stating in the journal that an exhibition falls within the definition of “international exhibition” in subsection (1) and any such statement shall be conclusive evidence that the exhibition falls within that definition.

(3) For the purposes of this Act, a matter shall be taken to have been disclosed in any relevant application within the meaning of section 17 or in the specification of a patent if it was either claimed or disclosed (otherwise than by way of disclaimer or acknowledgment of prior art) in that application or specification.

(4) For the purposes of this Act —

(a) a claim is related to another claim if —

(i) the 2 claims are identical; or

(ii) each limitation in the second claim —

(A) is identical to a limitation in the first claim; or

(B) differs from a limitation in the first claim only in expression but not in content; and

(b) more than one claim may be related to a single claim. [19/2004]

(5) References in this Act to an application for a patent, as filed, are references to such an application in the state it was on the date of filing.

(6) References in this Act to an application for a patent being published are references to its being published under section 27.

(7) References in this Act to the Paris Convention or the Patent Co- operation Treaty are references to that Convention or Treaty or any other international convention or agreement replacing it, as amended or supplemented by any convention or international agreement (including in either case any protocol or annex) to which Singapore

Patents15 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

is a party, or in accordance with the terms of any such convention or agreement and include references to any instrument made under any such convention or agreement.

(8) The Arbitration Act (Cap. 10) shall not apply to any proceedings before the Registrar under this Act.

Application to Government

3. This Act shall bind the Government.

PART II

ADMINISTRATION

Registrar of Patents and other officers

4.—(1) There shall be a Registrar of Patents who shall have the chief control of the Registry of Patents.

(2) There shall be one or more Deputy Registrars of Patents who shall, subject to the control of the Registrar, have all the powers and functions of the Registrar under this Act, other than the powers of the Registrar under section 5.

(3) There shall be one or more Assistant Registrars of Patents.

(4) The Registrar and all the other officers under this section shall be appointed by the Minister.

Delegation by Registrar

5.—(1) The Registrar may, in relation to a particular matter or class of matters, by writing under his hand, delegate all or any of his powers or functions under this Act (except this power of delegation) to an Assistant Registrar of Patents, any public officer, or any person with the relevant qualifications for or experience in the matter or class of matters, so that the delegated powers and functions may be exercised by the delegate with respect to the matter or class of matters specified in the instrument of delegation.

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 16

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) A delegation under this section is revocable at will and no delegation shall prevent the exercise of a power or function by the Registrar or by any Deputy Registrar of Patents.

(3) A person with the relevant qualifications or experience referred to in subsection (1) shall, when exercising the delegated powers and functions, be deemed to be a public servant for the purposes of the Penal Code (Cap. 224).

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

Registry of Patents

6. For the purposes of this Act, there shall be an office which shall be known as the Registry of Patents.

Seal of Registry

7. There shall be a seal of the Registry and impressions of the seal shall be judicially noticed.

Powers of Registrar

8. The Registrar may, for the purposes of this Act —

(a) summon witnesses;

(b) receive evidence on oath, whether orally or otherwise;

(d) award costs against a party to proceedings before him.

Disobedience to summons an offence

9.—(1) A person who has been summoned to appear as a witness before the Registrar shall not, without lawful excuse, fail to appear in obedience to the summons.

(2) A person who has been required by the Registrar to produce a document or article shall not, without lawful excuse, fail to produce the document or article.

(3) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or to both.

Patents17 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Refusal to give evidence an offence

10.—(1) A person who appears before the Registrar shall not, without lawful excuse, refuse to be sworn or to make an affirmation, or to produce documents or articles, or to answer questions, which he is lawfully required to produce or answer.

(2) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or to both.

Officers not to traffic in inventions

11.—(1) An officer or person employed in the Registry shall not buy, sell, acquire or traffic in an invention or patent, whether granted in Singapore or elsewhere, or in a right to, or licence under, a patent, whether granted in Singapore or elsewhere.

(3) A purchase, sale, acquisition, assignment or transfer made or entered into in contravention of this section is void.

(4) This section shall not apply to the actual inventor or to an acquisition by bequest or devolution in law.

Officers not to furnish information

12.—(1) An officer or person employed in the Registry shall not, except when required or authorised by this Act, or under a direction in writing of the Registrar or by order of a court —

(a) furnish information on a matter which is being, or has been, dealt with under this Act;

(b) prepare, or assist in the preparation of, a document required or permitted by or under this Act to be lodged in the Registry; or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 18

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART III

PATENTABILITY

Patentable inventions

13.—(1) Subject to subsection (2), a patentable invention is one that satisfies the following conditions:

(a) the invention is new;

(b) it involves an inventive step; and

(2) An invention the publication or exploitation of which would be generally expected to encourage offensive, immoral or anti-social behaviour is not a patentable invention.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), behaviour shall not be regarded as offensive, immoral or anti-social only because it is prohibited by any law in force in Singapore. [UK Patents 1977, s. 1]

Novelty

14.—(1) An invention shall be taken to be new if it does not form part of the state of the art.

(2) The state of the art in the case of an invention shall be taken to comprise all matter (whether a product, a process, information about either, or anything else) which has at any time before the priority date of that invention been made available to the public (whether in Singapore or elsewhere) by written or oral description, by use or in any other way.

(3) The state of the art in the case of an invention to which an application for a patent or a patent relates shall be taken also to

Patents19 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

comprise matter contained in an application for another patent which was published on or after the priority date of that invention, if the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) that matter was contained in the application for that other patent both as filed and as published; and

(b) the priority date of that matter is earlier than that of the invention.

(4) For the purposes of this section, the disclosure of matter constituting an invention shall be disregarded in the case of a patent or an application for a patent if occurring later than the beginning of the period of 12 months immediately preceding the date of filing the application for the patent and either —

(a) the disclosure was due to, or made in consequence of, the matter having been obtained unlawfully or in breach of confidence by any person —

(i) from the inventor or from any other person to whom the matter was made available in confidence by the inventor or who obtained it from the inventor because he or the inventor believed that he was entitled to obtain it; or

(ii) from any other person to whom the matter was made available in confidence by any person mentioned in sub‑paragraph (i) or in this sub‑paragraph or who obtained it from any person so mentioned because he or the person from whom he obtained it believed that he was entitled to obtain it;

(b) the disclosure was made in breach of confidence by any person who obtained the matter in confidence from the inventor or from any other person to whom it was made available, or who obtained it, from the inventor;

(c) the disclosure was due to, or made in consequence of, the inventor displaying the invention at an international exhibition;

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 20

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(d) the disclosure was due to, or made in consequence of, the inventor describing the invention in a paper read by him or another person with his consent or on his behalf before any learned society or published with his consent in the transactions of any learned society; or

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(e) subject to subsections (5A) and (5B), the disclosure was made to the public by the inventor, or by a person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor, in any circumstances not described in paragraphs (a) to (d).

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(5) In subsection (4)(d), “learned society” includes any club or association constituted in Singapore or elsewhere whose main object is the promotion of any branch of learning or science.

(5A) Subsection (4)(e) applies to the disclosure of matter constituting an invention due to, or in consequence of, the publication by an intellectual property administrator (being a person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor) of an application for an intellectual property right (being an application containing the matter, but not being the application for a patent mentioned in subsection (4)), or a registration of an intellectual property right pursuant to such an application, only if —

(a) the application was filed, without the consent of the inventor, by a person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor; or

(b) the publication was erroneous by reason that —

(i) the application had been withdrawn, refused or abandoned before the date of the publication; and

(ii) consequently, the publication was not required under the law (whether of Singapore or elsewhere) or treaty governing the application.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(5B) For the purposes of subsection (4)(e), where —

(a) the disclosure of matter constituting an invention is due to, or in consequence of, the publication by an intellectual

Patents21 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

property administrator (being a person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor) of an application for an intellectual property right (being an application containing the matter, but not being the application for a patent mentioned in subsection (4)), or a registration of an intellectual property right pursuant to such an application; and

(b) the publication was erroneous by reason that the publication occurred earlier than provided under the law (whether of Singapore or elsewhere) or treaty governing the application,

the matter is to be treated as disclosed to the public on the date when the publication should have occurred under that law or treaty.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(5C) If the applicant relies on any circumstances described in any paragraph of subsection (4) when —

(a) complying with section 29(1)(b) or (c), (3) or (9); or

(b) making a request under section 29B(1) for a review of an examination report issued under section 29(4) or a search and examination report issued under section 29(5),

the applicant must file written evidence complying with the prescribed requirements in support of the applicant’s reliance on those circumstances.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(6) In this section, references to the inventor include references to any proprietor of the invention for the time being.

(7) In the case of an invention consisting of a substance or composition for use in a method of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy or of diagnosis practised on the human or animal body, the fact that the substance or composition forms part of the state of the art shall not prevent the invention from being taken to be new if the use of the substance or composition in any such method does not form part of the state of the art. [UK Patents 1977, s. 2]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 22

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(8) In this section —

“foreign intellectual property office” means —

(a) any national or regional office outside Singapore that performs functions similar to those that are performed by —

(i) the Registry;

(ii) the Registry of Plant Varieties established under section 7 of the Plant Varieties Protection Act (Cap. 232A);

(iii) the Registry of Designs established under section 51 of the Registered Designs Act (Cap. 266); or

(iv) the Registry of Trade Marks established under section 64 of the Trade Marks Act (Cap. 332);

(b) the International Bureau; or

(c) the International Bureau as defined in section 2(1) of the Registered Designs Act or section 2(1) of the Trade Marks Act;

“intellectual property administrator” means —

(a) the Registrar;

(b) the Registrar of Designs;

(d) the Registrar of Trade Marks; or

(e) a foreign intellectual property office;

“Registrar of Designs”means the Registrar of Designs appointed under section 49 of the Registered Designs Act, and includes a Deputy Registrar of Designs and an Assistant Registrar of Designs appointed under that section;

“Registrar of Plant Varieties” means the Registrar of Plant Varieties appointed under section 5 of the Plant Varieties Protection Act, and includes a Deputy Registrar of Plant

Patents23 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Varieties and an Assistant Registrar of Plant Varieties appointed under that section;

“Registrar of Trade Marks” means the Registrar of Trade Marks appointed under section 62 of the Trade Marks Act, and includes a Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and an Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks appointed under that section.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

Inventive step

15. An invention shall be taken to involve an inventive step if it is not obvious to a person skilled in the art, having regard to any matter which forms part of the state of the art by virtue only of section 14(2) and without having regard to section 14(3). [UK Patents 1977, s. 3]

Industrial application

16.—(1) Subject to subsection (2), an invention shall be taken to be capable of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry, including agriculture.

(2) An invention of a method of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy or of diagnosis practised on the human or animal body shall not be taken to be capable of industrial application.

(3) Subsection (2) shall not prevent a product consisting of a substance or composition from being treated as capable of industrial application merely because it is invented for use in any such method. [UK Patents 1977, s. 4]

Priority date

17.—(1) For the purposes of this Act, the priority date of an invention to which an application for a patent relates and also of any matter (whether or not the same as the invention) contained in the application is, except as provided by the provisions of this Act, the date of filing the application.

(2) Where in or in connection with an application for a patent (referred to in this section as the application in suit) a declaration is made, whether by the applicant or any predecessor in title of his,

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 24

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

complying with the relevant requirements of the rules and specifying one or more earlier relevant applications for the purposes of this section made by the applicant or a predecessor in title of his, and the application in suit has a date of filing, within the period referred to in subsection (2A)(a) or (b), then —

(a) if an invention to which the application in suit relates is supported by matter disclosed in the earlier relevant application or applications, the priority date of that invention shall, instead of being the date of filing the application in suit, be the date of filing the relevant application in which that matter was disclosed or, if it was disclosed in more than one relevant application, the earliest of them; and

(b) the priority date of any matter contained in the application in suit which was also disclosed in the earlier relevant application or applications shall be the date of filing the relevant application in which that matter was disclosed or, if it was disclosed in more than one relevant application, the earliest of them.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), the period is —

(a) the period of 12 months immediately following the date of filing of the specified earlier relevant application or, if there is more than one relevant application, the earliest of them; or

(b) where the Registrar has granted a request under subsection (2B), the period commencing immediately after the period referred to in paragraph (a) and ending at the end of such period as may be prescribed.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(2B) The applicant may make a request to the Registrar for the declaration referred to in subsection (2) to be made after the period referred to in subsection (2A)(a).

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(2C) Where the applicant makes a request under subsection (2B), he shall, if he has failed to file the application in suit within the period

Patents25 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

referred to in subsection (2A)(a), indicate in the request whether his failure to file the application in suit within the period referred to in subsection (2A)(a) —

(a) occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken; or

(b) was unintentional. [2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(2D) The Registrar shall grant a request under subsection (2B) if and only if —

(a) the request is made within such period and in such manner, and complies with such requirements, as may be prescribed; and

(b) where the applicant has failed to file the application in suit within the period referred to in subsection (2A)(a), the Registrar is satisfied that the applicant’s failure to file the application in suit within the period referred to in subsection (2A)(a) —

(i) occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken; or

(ii) was unintentional. [2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(3) Where an invention or other matter contained in the application in suit was also disclosed in 2 earlier relevant applications filed by the same applicant as in the case of the application in suit or a predecessor in title of his and the second of those relevant applications was specified in or in connection with the application in suit, the second of those relevant applications shall, so far as it concerns that invention or matter, be disregarded unless —

(a) it was filed in or in respect of the same country as the first; and

(b) not later than the date of filing the second, the first (whether or not so specified) was unconditionally withdrawn, or was abandoned or refused, without —

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 26

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(i) having been made available to the public whether in Singapore or elsewhere;

(ii) leaving any right outstanding; and

(iii) having served to establish a priority date in relation to another application, wherever made.

(4) This section shall apply for determining the priority date of an invention for which a patent has been granted as it applies for determining the priority date of an invention to which an application for that patent relates.

(5) In this section and section 18, “relevant application” means any of the following applications which has a date of filing:

(a) an application for a patent under this Act; or

(b) an application in or for a convention country for protection in respect of an invention or an application which, in accordance with the law of a convention country or a treaty or international convention to which a convention country is a party, is equivalent to such an application.

[30/2001]

(6) In subsection (5), “convention country” means —

(a) a country other than Singapore that is a party to the Paris Convention or a member of the World Trade Organisation; or

(b) any other country with which Singapore has entered into a treaty, convention, arrangement or engagement and which is declared by the Minister, by order published in the Gazette, as a convention country.

[30/2001] [UK Patents 1977, s. 5]

Disclosure of matter, etc., between earlier and later applications

18.—(1) It is hereby declared for the avoidance of doubt that where an application (the application in suit) is made for a patent and a declaration is made in accordance with section 17(2) in or in connection with that application specifying an earlier relevant application, the application in suit and any patent granted in

Patents27 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

pursuance of it shall not be invalidated by reason only of the relevant intervening acts.

(2) In subsection (1), “relevant intervening acts”means acts done in relation to matter disclosed in an earlier relevant application between the dates of the earlier relevant application and the application in suit, as for example, filing another application for the invention for which the earlier relevant application was made, making information available to the public about that invention or that matter or working that invention, but disregarding any application, or the disclosure to the public of matter contained in any application, which is itself to be disregarded for the purposes of section 17(3). [UK Patents 1977, s. 6]

PART IV

RIGHT TO APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN PATENT

Right to apply for and obtain patent

19.—(1) Any person may make an application for a patent either alone or jointly with another.

(2) A patent for an invention may be granted —

(a) primarily to the inventor or joint inventors;

(b) in preference to paragraph (a), to any person or persons who, by virtue of any enactment or rule of law, or any foreign law or treaty or international convention, or by virtue of an enforceable term of any agreement entered into with the inventor before the making of the invention, was or were at the time of the making of the invention entitled to the whole of the property in it (other than equitable interests) in Singapore; or

(c) in any event, to the successor or successors in title of any person or persons mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) or any person so mentioned and the successor or successors in title of another person so mentioned,

and to no other person.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 28

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) Except so far as the contrary is established, a person who makes an application for a patent shall be taken to be the person who is entitled under subsection (2) to be granted a patent and 2 or more persons who make such an application jointly shall be taken to be the persons so entitled. [UK Patents 1977, s. 7]

Determination before grant of questions about entitlement to patents, etc.

20.—(1) At any time before a patent has been granted for an invention —

(a) any person may refer to the Registrar the question whether he is entitled to be granted (alone or with any other persons) a patent for that invention or has or would have any right in or under any patent so granted or any application for such a patent; or

(b) any of 2 or more co-proprietors of an application for a patent for that invention may so refer the question whether any right in or under application should be transferred or granted to any other person,

and the Registrar shall determine the question and may make such order as he thinks fit to give effect to the determination.

(2) Where a person refers a question relating to an invention under subsection (1)(a) to the Registrar after an application for a patent for the invention has been filed and before a patent is granted in pursuance of the application, then, unless the application is refused or withdrawn before the reference is disposed of by the Registrar, the Registrar may, without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1) and subject to subsection (6) —

(a) order that the application shall proceed in the name of that person, either solely or jointly with that of any other applicant or any specified applicant;

(b) where the reference was made by 2 or more persons, order that the application shall proceed in all their names jointly;

Patents29 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(c) refuse to grant a patent in pursuance of the application or order the application to be amended so as to exclude any of the matter in respect of which the question was referred; or

(d) make an order transferring or granting any licence or other right in or under the application and give directions to any person for carrying out the provisions of any such order.

(3) Where a question is referred to the Registrar under subsection (1)(a) and —

(a) the Registrar orders an application for a patent for the invention to which the question relates to be so amended;

(b) any such application is refused under subsection (2)(c) before the Registrar has disposed of the reference (whether the reference was made before or after the publication of the application); or

(c) any such application is refused under any other provision of this Act or is withdrawn before the Registrar has disposed of the reference, but after the publication of the application,

the Registrar may order that any person by whom the reference was made may within the prescribed period make a new application for a patent for the whole or part of any matter comprised in the earlier application or, as the case may be, for all or any of the matter excluded from the earlier application, subject in either case to section 84, and in either case that, if such a new application is made, it shall be treated as having been filed on the date of filing the earlier application.

(4) Where a person refers a question under subsection (1)(b) relating to an application, any order under subsection (1) may contain directions to any person for transferring or granting any right in or under the application.

(5) If any person to whom directions have been given under subsection (2)(d) or (4) fails to do anything necessary for carrying out any such directions within 14 days after the date of the directions, the Registrar may, on application made to him by any person in whose favour or on whose reference the directions were given, authorise him to do that thing on behalf of the person to whom the directions were given.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 30

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(6) Where on a reference under this section it is alleged that, by virtue of any transaction, instrument or event relating to an invention or an application for a patent, any person other than the inventor or the applicant for the patent has become entitled to be granted (whether alone or with any other persons) a patent for the invention or has or would have any right in or under any patent so granted or any application for any such patent, an order shall not be made under subsection (2)(a), (b) or (d) on the reference unless notice of the reference is given to the applicant and any such person, except any of them who is a party to the reference.

(7) If it appears to the Registrar on a reference of a question under this section that the question involves matters which would more properly be determined by the court, he may decline to deal with it and, without prejudice to the court’s jurisdiction to determine any such question and make a declaration, the court shall have jurisdiction to do so.

(8) No direction shall be given under this section so as to affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the personal representatives of deceased persons, or their rights or obligations as such. [UK Patents 1977, s. 8]

Determination after grant of questions referred before grant

21. If a question with respect to a patent or application is referred by any person to the Registrar under section 20, and is not determined before the time when the application is first in order for a grant of a patent in pursuance of the application, that fact shall not prevent the grant of a patent, but on its grant that person shall be treated as having referred to the Registrar under section 47 any question mentioned in that section which the Registrar thinks appropriate. [UK Patents 1977, s. 9]

Handling of application by joint applicants

22. If any dispute arises between joint applicants for a patent whether or in what manner the application should be proceeded with, the Registrar may, on a request made by any of the parties, give such directions as he thinks fit for enabling the application to proceed in the

Patents31 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

name of one or more of the parties alone or for regulating the manner in which it shall be proceeded with, or for both those purposes, as the case may require. [UK Patents 1977, s. 10]

Effect of transfer of application under section 20 or 22

23.—(1) Where an order is made or directions are given under section 20 or 22 that an application for a patent shall proceed in the name of one or some of the original applicants (whether or not it is also to proceed in the name of some other person), any licences or other rights in or under the application shall, subject to the provisions of the order and any directions under either of those sections, continue in force and be treated as granted by the persons in whose name the application is to proceed.

(2) Where an order is made or directions are given under section 20 that an application for a patent shall proceed in the name of one or more persons none of whom was an original applicant (on the ground that the original applicant or applicants was or were not entitled to be granted the patent), any licences or other rights in or under the application shall, subject to the provisions of the order and any directions under that section and subject to subsection (3), lapse on the registration of the person or those persons as the applicant or applicants or, where the application has not been published, on the making of the order.

(3) If before registration of a reference under section 20 resulting in the making of any order mentioned in subsection (2) —

(a) the original applicant or any of the applicants, acting in good faith, worked the invention in question in Singapore or made effective and serious preparations to do so; or

(b) a licensee of the applicant, acting in good faith, worked the invention in Singapore or made effective and serious preparations to do so,

that or those original applicant or applicants or the licensee shall, on making a request within the prescribed period to the person in whose name the application is to proceed, be entitled to be granted a licence

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 32

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(but not an exclusive licence) to continue working or, as the case may be, to work the invention.

(4) Any such licence shall be granted for a reasonable period and on reasonable terms.

(5) Where an order is made as mentioned in subsection (2), the person in whose name the application is to proceed or any person claiming that he is entitled to be granted any such licence may refer to the Registrar the question whether the latter is so entitled and whether any such period is or terms are reasonable.

(6) The Registrar shall determine the question under subsection (5) and may, if he considers it appropriate, order the grant of such a licence. [UK Patents 1977, s. 11]

Mention of inventor

24.—(1) The inventor or joint inventors of an invention shall have a right to be mentioned as such in any patent granted for the invention and shall also have a right to be so mentioned if possible in any published application for a patent for the invention and, if not so mentioned, a right to be so mentioned in accordance with the rules in a prescribed document.

(2) Unless he has already given the Registry the information mentioned in this subsection, an applicant for a patent shall, within the prescribed period, file with the Registry a statement —

(a) identifying the person or persons whom he believes to be the inventor or inventors; and

(b) where the applicant is not the sole inventor or the applicants are not the joint inventors, indicating the derivation of his or their right to be granted the patent,

and, if he fails to do so, the application shall be treated as having been abandoned.

(3) Where a person has been mentioned as a sole or joint inventor under this section, any other person who alleges that the former ought not to have been mentioned may at any time apply to the Registrar for

Patents33 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

a certificate to that effect, and the Registrar may issue such a certificate. [UK Patents 1977, s. 13]

PART V

APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS

Making of application

25.—(1) Every application for a patent —

(a) shall be made in the prescribed form and shall be filed at the Registry in the prescribed manner; and

(b) shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.

(2) Where an application is not accompanied by the fee mentioned in subsection (1)(b), the fee shall be paid within the prescribed period.

(3) Every application for a patent shall contain —

(a) a request for the grant of a patent;

(b) a specification containing a description of the invention, a claim or claims and any drawing referred to in the description or any claim; and

but this subsection shall not prevent an application being initiated by documents complying with section 26(1).

(4) The specification of an application shall disclose the invention in a manner which is clear and complete for the invention to be performed by a person skilled in the art.

(5) The claim or claims shall —

(a) define the matter for which the applicant seeks protection;

(b) be clear and concise;

(d) relate to one invention or to a group of inventions which are so linked as to form a single inventive concept.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 34

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(6) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (5)(d), the rules may provide for treating 2 or more inventions as being so linked as to form a single inventive concept for the purposes of this Act.

(7) The purpose of the abstract is to give technical information and on publication it shall not form part of the state of the art by virtue of section 14(3), and the Registrar may determine whether the abstract adequately fulfils its purpose and, if it does not, may reframe it so that it does.

(8) Subject to subsection (9), an application for a patent may be withdrawn at any time before the patent is granted and any withdrawal of such an application may not be revoked. [UK Patents 1977, s. 14]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(9) A request to withdraw an application for a patent shall be made in such manner as may be prescribed.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Date of filing application

26.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the date of filing an application for a patent shall be taken to be the earliest date on which the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application satisfy the following conditions:

(a) the documents indicate that a patent is sought;

(b) the documents identify the applicant for the patent; and

(i) something which is or appears to be a description of the invention for which the patent is sought; or

(ii) where a declaration under section 17(2) is made in or in connection with the application —

(A) a reference to an earlier relevant application specified in the declaration;

(B) such information on the earlier relevant application as may be prescribed; and

Patents35 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(C) a statement that the description of the invention for which the patent is sought is incorporated in the application by reference to, and is completely contained in, the earlier relevant application, as filed.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(c)(i), it is immaterial whether —

(a) the thing is in, or is accompanied by a translation into, a language accepted by the Registry in accordance with the rules; or

(b) the thing otherwise complies with the other provisions of this Act and with any relevant rules.

(3) Where the Registrar determines that the documents filed at the Registry to initiate an application for a patent do not satisfy all of the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(i) or (ii) —

(a) the Registrar shall, as soon as practicable after the filing of those documents, notify the applicant of what else must be filed in order for the application to have a date of filing; and

(b) the applicant shall, within such period as may be prescribed, do either or both of the following:

(i) make observations on the Registrar’s determination;

(ii) file every document which must be filed in order for the application to have a date of filing.

(4) Where subsection (3) applies, if the applicant fails to file every document which must be filed in order for the application to have a date of filing before the end of the period prescribed under subsection (3)(b), the application shall be treated as having been abandoned.

(5) Subsection (4) does not apply if —

(a) the applicant makes observations as mentioned in subsection (3)(b)(i) before the end of the period prescribed under subsection (3)(b); and

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 36

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) as a result of the observations, the Registrar is satisfied that the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application satisfy all of the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(i) or (ii).

(6) Where the documents filed at the Registry to initiate an application for a patent satisfy all of the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(i) or (ii), the Registrar shall, as soon as practicable after the filing of the last of those documents, notify the applicant of the date of filing of the application.

(7) Where an application for a patent has a date of filing under subsection (1) by reason only that the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application satisfy the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(ii), the applicant shall, within such period as may be prescribed, file at the Registry —

(a) a written notice confirming that the description of the invention for which the patent is sought is incorporated in the application by reference to the earlier relevant application referred to in subsection (1)(c)(ii)(C);

(b) the description of the invention for which the patent is sought; and

(8) If an application for a patent has a date of filing by virtue of subsection (1), the applicant files at the Registry any missing part of the application within such period and in such manner as may be prescribed, and the applicant does not withdraw that missing part before the end of that period, then —

(a) that missing part shall be treated as included in the application; and

(b) the date of filing of the application shall be the date on which that missing part is filed at the Registry.

(9) Subsection (8)(b) does not apply if —

(a) on or before the date which is the date of filing of the application for a patent by virtue of subsection (1), a declaration is made under section 17(2), in or in connection

Patents37 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

with the application, specifying an earlier relevant application; and

(b) within such period as may be prescribed, the applicant —

(i) makes a request to the Registrar for subsection (8)(b) not to apply to the application;

(ii) files a statement that the missing part referred to in subsection (8) is incorporated in the application by reference to, and is completely contained in, the earlier relevant application, as filed;

(iii) furnishes such information on the earlier relevant application as may be prescribed; and

(iv) files such other documents as may be prescribed.

(10) Subsections (8) and (9) do not affect the power of the Registrar under section 107(1) to correct an error or a mistake.

(11) Where, after an application for a patent has been filed, but before the applicant satisfies the condition under section 30(c), or the application is refused, withdrawn, treated as or taken to be withdrawn, or treated as abandoned or as having been abandoned —

(a) a new application is filed by the original applicant or his successor in title in accordance with the rules in respect of any part of the matter contained in the earlier application; and

(b) the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(i) or (ii) are satisfied in relation to the new application (without the new application contravening section 84),

the new application shall be treated as having, as its date of filing, the date of filing of the earlier application.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(12) Where an application has a date of filing by virtue of this section, the application shall be treated as having been abandoned unless —

(a) the applicant files at the Registry, before the end of such period as may be prescribed, one or more claims for the purposes of the application;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 38

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) the applicant pays the filing fee under section 25(1)(b) before the end of the period prescribed under section 25(2); and

(c) where the application has a date of filing under subsection (1) by reason only that the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application satisfy the conditions in subsection (1)(a), (b) and (c)(ii), the applicant files at the Registry the documents referred to in subsection (7)(a), (b) and (c) before the end of the period prescribed under subsection (7).

(13) In this section, “relevant application” has the same meaning as in section 17(5).

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

Publication of application

27.—(1) Subject to section 33, where an application has a date of filing, then, as soon as possible after the end of the prescribed period, the Registrar shall, unless the application is withdrawn in the prescribed manner, treated as having been abandoned or refused before preparations for its publication have been completed by the Registry, publish it as filed (including not only the original claims but also any amendment of those claims and new claims subsisting immediately before the completion of those preparations).

[19/2004]

(2) The Registrar may, if so requested by the applicant, publish the application as mentioned in subsection (1) during the prescribed period, and in either event shall publish the fact and date of its publication in the journal.

(3) The Registrar may omit from the specification of a published application for a patent any matter —

(a) which in his opinion disparages any person in a way likely to damage him; or

(b) the publication or exploitation of which would in his opinion be generally expected to encourage offensive, immoral or anti-social behaviour.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 16]

Patents39 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART VI

PROCEDURE FOR GRANT OF PATENT

Preliminary examination

28.—(1) The Registrar shall conduct a preliminary examination of an application for a patent if —

(a) the application has a date of filing;

(b) the application has not been withdrawn or treated as abandoned;

(d) one or more claims for the purposes of the application have been filed under section 26(12)(a); and

(e) where the application has a date of filing under section 26(1) by reason only that the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application satisfy the conditions in section 26(1)(a), (b) and (c)(ii), the documents referred to in section 26(7)(a), (b) and (c) have been filed at the Registry.

(2) If, after the Registrar has conducted a preliminary examination of an application for a patent under subsection (1), the applicant files at the Registry, and does not withdraw, any missing part of the application in accordance with section 26(8), then the Registrar shall conduct another preliminary examination of the application, with the missing part treated as included in the application.

(3) On a preliminary examination of an application, the Registrar shall determine —

(a) whether the application complies with all the formal requirements; and

(b) whether —

(i) any drawing referred to in the application; or

(ii) any part of the description of the invention for which the patent is sought,

is missing from the application.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 40

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(4) If the Registrar determines under subsection (3)(a) that not all the formal requirements have been complied with, then the Registrar shall notify the applicant accordingly, and the applicant shall, within the prescribed period —

(a) make observations on the Registrar’s determination; and

(b) subject to section 84, amend the application in the prescribed manner, so as to comply with all the formal requirements.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(5) Where subsection (4) applies, the Registrar may refuse the application if the applicant fails to amend the application as mentioned in paragraph (b) of that subsection before the end of the prescribed period under that subsection.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(6) Subsection (5) does not apply if —

(a) the applicant makes observations as mentioned in subsection (4)(a) before the end of the prescribed period under subsection (4); and

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) as a result of the observations, the Registrar is satisfied that all the formal requirements have been complied with.

(7) If the Registrar determines under subsection (3)(b) that a drawing or part of the description of the invention is missing from the application, then the Registrar shall notify the applicant accordingly.

(8) Where subsection (7) applies, if the applicant files the drawing or part of the description of the invention that is missing from the application within such period and in such manner as may be prescribed, and the applicant does not withdraw that drawing or part of the description of the invention before the end of that period, then —

(a) that drawing or part of the description of the invention shall be treated as included in the application; and

Patents41 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) the date of filing of the application shall be the date on which that drawing or part of the description of the invention is filed at the Registry.

(9) Subsection (8)(b) does not apply if —

(a) on or before the date which is the date of filing of the application by virtue of section 26(1), a declaration is made under section 17(2), in or in connection with the application, specifying an earlier relevant application; and

(b) within such period as may be prescribed, the applicant —

(i) makes a request to the Registrar for subsection (8)(b) not to apply to the application;

(ii) files a statement that the drawing or part of the description of the invention referred to in subsection (8) is incorporated in the application by reference to, and is completely contained in, the earlier relevant application, as filed;

(iii) furnishes such information on the earlier relevant application as may be prescribed; and

(iv) files such other documents as may be prescribed.

(10) In subsection (9), “relevant application” has the same meaning as in section 17(5).

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(11) Where an application for a patent complies with all the formal requirements under this section within the prescribed period, the Registrar shall send a notification to the applicant.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Search and examination

29.—(1) The applicant in an application for a patent (referred to in this subsection as the application in suit) shall comply with one of the following paragraphs within the period prescribed for that paragraph:

(a) file a request in the prescribed form for a search report;

(b) file a request in the prescribed form for a search and examination report;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 42

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(c) file the prescribed documents and a request in the prescribed form for an examination report, where the applicant relies on the final results of —

(i) a search in one corresponding application, corresponding international application or related national phase application; or

(ii) a search during the international phase of the application in suit (if the application in suit is an international application for a patent (Singapore) that has entered the national phase in Singapore under section 86(3));

(d) subject to subsection (11A), file the prescribed documents and a request in the prescribed form for a supplementary examination report, where —

(i) the applicant relies on the final results of —

(A) any search and examination as to the substance of one corresponding application, corresponding international application or related national phase application; or

(B) any search and examination as to the substance of the application in suit during its international phase (if the application in suit is an international application for a patent (Singapore) that has entered the national phase in Singapore under section 86(3));

(ii) each claim in the application in suit is related to at least one claim in that corresponding application, corresponding international application or related national phase application, or in the application in suit during its international phase, as the case may be; and

(iii) according to those results, each claim in the application in suit appears to satisfy the criteria of

Patents43 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

novelty, inventive step (or non-obviousness) and industrial applicability (or utility).

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(2) Where the applicant has complied with subsection (1)(a), the Registrar shall —

(a) cause the application to be subjected to a search by an Examiner; and

(b) upon receiving the search report prepared by the Examiner, send the applicant a copy of that report.

(3) Upon receiving the search report under subsection (2)(b) from the Registrar, the applicant shall, within the prescribed period, file a request in the prescribed form for an examination report.

(4) Where the applicant has complied with subsection (1)(c) or (3), the Registrar shall —

(a) cause the application to be subjected to an examination by an Examiner; and

(b) upon receiving the examination report prepared by the Examiner, send the applicant a copy of that report.

(5) Where the applicant has complied with subsection (1)(b), the Registrar shall —

(a) cause the application to be subjected to —

(i) a search by an Examiner; and

(ii) an examination by an Examiner; and

(b) upon receiving the search and examination report prepared by the Examiner, send the applicant a copy of that report.

(6) Where the applicant has complied with subsection (1)(d), the Registrar shall —

(a) cause the application to be subjected to a supplementary examination by an Examiner; and

(b) upon receiving the supplementary examination report prepared by the Examiner, send the applicant a copy of that report.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 44

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(7) If it appears to an Examiner during the examination of an application under subsection (4) or (5) that one or more of the matters prescribed for the purposes of this subsection apply, the Examiner shall give the applicant at least one written opinion to that effect, and the Registrar shall, upon receiving the written opinion, send the applicant a copy of the written opinion.

(8) If it appears to an Examiner during the supplementary examination of an application under subsection (6) that one or more of the matters prescribed for the purposes of this subsection apply, the Examiner shall give the applicant one written opinion to that effect, and the Registrar shall, upon receiving the written opinion, send the applicant a copy of the written opinion.

(9) Unless the request under subsection (1)(b), (c) or (d) or (3) for the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report is withdrawn under subsection (10) or (11), the applicant shall, before the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report is issued under subsection (4), (5) or (6), as the case may be—

(a) respond in the prescribed manner, within the prescribed period, to the written opinion under subsection (7) or (8), as the case may be; and

(b) subject to section 84, amend in the prescribed manner, within the prescribed period, the specification of the application in accordance with the prescribed conditions.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(10) Despite subsection (1), where an applicant has filed a request for an examination report under subsection (1)(c) or (3), or a request for a search and examination report under subsection (1)(b), the applicant may —

(a) withdraw that request —

(i) in any case where an Examiner has given a written opinion under subsection (7), and the applicant has not responded to the written opinion — at any time before the expiry of the prescribed period mentioned in subsection (9)(a); or

Patents45 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(ii) in any other case — at any time before the examination report or search and examination report is issued under subsection (4) or (5); and

(b) subject to subsection (11A), file a request for a supplementary examination report under subsection (1)(d) within the prescribed period for that request.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(11) Despite subsection (1), where an applicant has filed a request for a supplementary examination report under subsection (1)(d), the applicant may —

(a) withdraw that request —

(i) in any case where an Examiner has given a written opinion under subsection (8), and the applicant has not responded to the written opinion — at any time before the expiry of the prescribed period mentioned in subsection (9)(a); or

(ii) in any other case — at any time before the supplementary examination report is issued under subsection (6); and

(b) file a request for a search and examination report under subsection (1)(b) or a request for an examination report under subsection (1)(c) or (3) within the prescribed period for that request.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(11A) Subsections (1)(d) and (10)(b) do not apply unless —

(a) in any case where the application in suit is a new application mentioned in section 20(3), 26(11) or 47(4) — the actual date of filing of the application in suit is before the prescribed date; or

(b) in any other case — the date of filing of the application in suit is before the prescribed date.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(12) The application shall be treated as abandoned —

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 46

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) subject to subsection (13), if the applicant fails to do one of the following:

(i) comply with paragraph (b), (c) or (d) of subsection (1) within the period prescribed under that subsection for that paragraph;

(ii) where subsection (3) applies, comply with that subsection;

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(b) where subsection (10) applies, if the applicant fails to file a request for a supplementary examination report under subsection (1)(d) within the prescribed period referred to in subsection (10)(b); or

(c) where subsection (11) applies, if the applicant fails to file a request for a search and examination report under subsection (1)(b) or a request for an examination report under subsection (1)(c) or (3) within the prescribed period referred to in subsection (11)(b).

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(13) Where —

(a) after receiving the search report under subsection (2)(b) from the Registrar, the applicant does not file a request for an examination report under subsection (3) within the prescribed period mentioned in that subsection; and

(b) the time prescribed for filing a request for an extension of the prescribed period mentioned in subsection (3) expires before, or within 3 months after, the date of commencement of section 3(f) of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2017,

the application is treated as abandoned if the applicant fails to file the request for an examination report under subsection (3) within 6 months after that date.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

(14) In this section, “actual date of filing”, in relation to an application in suit that is a new application mentioned in section 20(3), 26(11) or 47(4), means the actual date of filing of the

Patents47 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

new application, and not the date of filing of the earlier application mentioned in section 20(3) or 26(11) or of the application for the patent to which the reference relates mentioned in section 47(4), as the case may be.

[Act 18 of 2017 wef 30/10/2017]

Eligibility for grant of patent, etc.

29A.—(1) Where an examination report issued under section 29(4), a search and examination report issued under section 29(5) or a supplementary examination report issued under section 29(6) does not contain any unresolved objection, the Registrar shall issue to the applicant a notice of eligibility to proceed to the grant of a patent.

(2) Where the Registrar has issued to the applicant a notice under subsection (1) —

(a) the applicant shall satisfy the conditions under section 30(a) and (c) within the prescribed period; and

(b) if the applicant fails to comply with paragraph (a), the application shall be treated as abandoned.

(3) Where an examination report issued under section 29(4), a search and examination report issued under section 29(5) or a supplementary examination report issued under section 29(6) contains one or more unresolved objections, the Registrar shall issue to the applicant a notice of intention to refuse the application for a patent.

(4) Where the Registrar has issued to the applicant a notice under subsection (3) —

(a) the applicant may, within the prescribed period, apply for a review of the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be, in accordance with section 29B(1); and

(b) if the applicant fails to apply for the review under paragraph (a), the application for a patent shall be refused.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 48

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Review of examination report, etc.

29B.—(1) A request for a review of an examination report issued under section 29(4), a search and examination report issued under section 29(5) or a supplementary examination report issued under section 29(6) shall be made by filing —

(a) the prescribed form for the request within the prescribed period; and

(b) written submissions to overcome the unresolved objections in the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be.

(2) At the time the request under subsection (1) is made, the applicant may, subject to section 84, amend in the prescribed manner the specification of the application to overcome one or more unresolved objections in the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be.

(3) Upon completing the review of the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be, the Examiner shall prepare an examination review report.

(4) The examination review report shall specify —

(a) whether the Examiner agrees or disagrees with the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be;

(b) where the applicant has amended the specification of the application under subsection (2), whether each unresolved objection in the examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report, as the case may be, has been overcome in the amended specification; and

(5) Upon receiving the examination review report, the Registrar shall send the applicant —

Patents49 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) a copy of that report; and

(b) either —

(i) a notice of eligibility to proceed to the grant of a patent, if the Registrar is satisfied by that report that there is no unresolved objection; or

(ii) a notice of refusal of the application for a patent, if the Registrar is satisfied by that report that there are one or more unresolved objections.

(5A) Where the Registrar has issued to the applicant a notice under subsection (5)(b)(i) —

(a) the applicant shall satisfy the conditions under section 30(a) and (c) within the prescribed period; and

(b) if the applicant fails to comply with paragraph (a), the application shall be treated as abandoned.

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

(6) Where the Registrar has sent the applicant a notice under subsection (5)(b)(ii), the refusal of the application for a patent shall take effect upon the expiry of the prescribed period.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Grant of patent

30. The Registrar shall grant the applicant a patent if all of the following conditions have been satisfied:

(a) all the formal requirements have been complied with;

(b) the applicant has received a notice of eligibility to proceed to the grant of a patent under section 29A(1) or 29B(5)(b)(i); and

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

General power to amend application before grant

31.—(1) Subject to subsections (2), (3) and (4), the applicant may, of his own volition or otherwise, amend the application or the specification thereof.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 50

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) The applicant shall not be entitled to amend the application or specification unless —

(a) he has made a request to do so to the Registrar —

(i) in the prescribed manner; and

(ii) within the prescribed period; and

(b) the request is accompanied by the prescribed documents.

(3) The applicant may only amend the application or specification in accordance with the prescribed conditions and subject to section 84.

(4) If the applicant fails to comply with any requirement under subsection (2) or (3), the Registrar shall —

(a) refuse the applicant’s request to amend the application or specification; and

(b) inform the applicant of the refusal. [Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

32. [Repealed by Act 19/2004]

Information prejudicial to defence of Singapore or safety of public

33.—(1) Where an application for a patent is filed in the Registry (whether under this Act or any treaty or international convention to which Singapore is a party) and it appears to the Registrar that the application contains information of a description notified to him by the Minister as being information the publication of which might be prejudicial to the defence of Singapore, the Registrar shall give directions prohibiting or restricting the publication of that information or its communication to any specified person or description of persons.

(2) If it appears to the Registrar that any application so filed contains information the publication of which might be prejudicial to the safety of the public, he may give directions prohibiting or restricting the publication of that information or its communication to any specified person or description of persons until the end of a period not exceeding 3 months from the end of a period prescribed for the purposes of section 27.

Patents51 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) While directions are in force under this section with respect to an application —

(a) if the application is made under this Act, it will be held in abeyance after the formal requirements of this Act and the rules have been met and will not proceed to be processed in accordance with section 29 until the directions are revoked under subsection (4)(e); and

(b) if it is an international application for a patent, a copy of it shall not be sent to the International Bureau or any international searching authority appointed under the Patent Co-operation Treaty.

(4) Where the Registrar gives directions under this section with respect to any application, he shall give notice of the application and of the directions to the Minister, and the following provisions shall then have effect:

(a) theMinister shall, on receipt of the notice, consider whether the publication of the application or the publication or communication of the information in question would be prejudicial to the defence of Singapore or the safety of the public;

(b) if the Minister determines under paragraph (a) that the publication or communication of that information would be prejudicial to the safety of the public, he shall notify the Registrar who shall continue his directions under subsection (2) until they are revoked under paragraph (e);

(c) if the Minister determines under paragraph (a) that the publication of the application or the publication or communication of that information would be prejudicial to the defence of Singapore or the safety of the public, he shall (unless a notice under paragraph (d) has previously been given by the Minister to the Registrar) reconsider that question during the period of 9 months from the date of filing the application and at least once in every subsequent period of 12 months;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 52

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(d) if on consideration of an application at any time it appears to the Minister that the publication of the application or the publication or communication of the information contained in it would not, or would no longer, be prejudicial to the defence of Singapore or the safety of the public, he shall give notice to the Registrar to that effect; and

(e) on receipt of such a notice the Registrar shall revoke the directions and may, subject to such conditions (if any) as he thinks fit, extend the time for doing anything required or authorised to be done by or under this Act in connection with the application, whether or not that time has previously expired.

(5) The Minister may at any time, for the purpose of enabling him to decide the question referred to in subsection (4)(c), do one or both of the following, that is to say, inspect or authorise any person to inspect the application and any document sent to the Registrar in connection with it and where a person is authorised to carry out such inspection, he shall as soon as practicable report on his inspection to the Minister.

(6) Where directions given under this section in respect of an application for a patent for an invention are revoked, and the application is brought in order for the grant of a patent and a patent is granted for the invention, then —

(a) if while the directions are in force the invention is worked by (or with the written authorisation of or to the order of) a Government department, the provisions of Part XII shall apply as if —

(i) the working were use made by section 56;

(ii) the application had been published at the end of the prescribed period or at the time the directions were revoked, whichever is earlier; and

(iii) a patent had been granted for the invention at the time the application is brought in order for the grant of a patent (taking the terms of the patent to be those of the application as it stood at the time it was so brought in order); and

Patents53 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) if it appears to the Minister that the applicant for the patent has suffered hardship while the directions were in force, the Minister may make such payment (if any) by way of compensation to the applicant as appears to the Minister to be reasonable having regard to the inventive merit and utility of the invention, the purpose for which it is designed and any other relevant circumstances.

(7) Where a patent is granted in pursuance of an application in respect of which directions have been given under this section, no renewal fees shall be payable in respect of any period during which those directions were in force.

(8) Any person who fails to comply with any direction under this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.

(9) Nothing in this section shall prevent the disclosure of information concerning an invention to a Government department or authority for the purpose of obtaining advice as to whether directions under this section with respect to an application for a patent for that invention should be made, amended or revoked. [UK Patents 1977, s. 22]

Restrictions on applications abroad by Singapore residents

34.—(1) Subject to this section, no person resident in Singapore shall, without written authority granted by the Registrar, file or cause to be filed outside Singapore an application for a patent for an invention unless —

(a) an application for a patent for the same invention has been filed in the Registry not less than 2 months before the application outside Singapore; and

(b) no directions have been given under section 33 in relation to the application in Singapore or all such directions have been revoked.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 54

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) Subsection (1) shall not apply to an application for a patent for an invention for which an application for a patent has first been filed in a country outside Singapore by a person resident outside Singapore.

(3) Any person who files or causes to be filed an application for the grant of a patent in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.

(4) In this section —

(a) any reference to an application for a patent includes a reference to an application for other protection for an invention;

(b) any reference to either kind of application is a reference to an application under this Act, under the law of any country other than Singapore or under any treaty or international convention to which Singapore is a party; and

(c) “person resident in Singapore” includes a person who, at the material time, is residing in Singapore by virtue of a valid pass lawfully issued to him under the Immigration Act (Cap. 133) to enter and remain in Singapore for any purpose.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 23]

PART VII

PROVISIONS AS TO PATENTS AFTER GRANT

Publication and certificate of grant

35.—(1) As soon as practicable after a patent has been granted under this Act, the Registrar shall —

(a) send to the proprietor of the patent a certificate in the prescribed form that the patent has been granted to the proprietor; and

(b) publish in the journal a notice that the patent has been granted.

[30/2001]

Patents55 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) The Registrar shall, at the same time as he publishes a notice under subsection (1)(b) in relation to a patent, publish the specification of the patent, the names of the proprietor and (if different) the inventor and any other matters constituting or relating to the patent which in the Registrar’s opinion it is desirable to publish. [UK Patents 1977, s. 24]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

[30/2001]

Term of patent

36.—(1) A patent granted under this Act shall be treated for the purposes of this Act as having been granted, and shall take effect, on the date of issue of the certificate of grant and, subject to subsection (2) and section 36A, shall continue in force until the end of the period of 20 years beginning with the date of filing the application for the patent or with such other date as may be prescribed.

[19/2004]

(2) A patent shall cease to have effect at the end of the prescribed period for the payment of any renewal fee if it is not paid within that period.

(3) If during the period of 6 months immediately following the end of the prescribed period the renewal fee and any prescribed additional fee are paid, the patent shall be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it had never expired, and accordingly —

(a) anything done under or in relation to it during that further period shall be valid;

(b) an act which would constitute an infringement of it if it had not expired shall constitute such an infringement; and

(c) an act which would constitute the use of the patented invention in accordance with section 56 if the patent had not expired shall constitute that use.

[19/2004]

(4) Rules shall include provision requiring the Registrar to notify the registered proprietor of a patent that a renewal fee has not been

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 56

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

received from him in the Registry before the end of the prescribed period and before the framing of the notification. [UK Patents 1977, s. 25]

[30/2001]

Extension of term of patent

36A.—(1) The proprietor of a patent may apply to the Registrar to extend the term of the patent on any of the following grounds:

(a) that there was an unreasonable delay by the Registrar in granting the patent;

(b) where the patent was granted on the basis of any prescribed documents referred to in section 29(1)(d) relating to one corresponding application or related national phase application, that —

(i) there was an unreasonable delay in the issue of the corresponding patent or related national phase patent (as the case may be); and

(ii) the patent office that granted the corresponding patent or related national phase patent (as the case may be) has extended the term of the corresponding patent or related national phase patent (as the case may be) on the basis of such delay;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(c) where the subject of the patent includes any substance which is an active ingredient of any pharmaceutical product, that —

(i) there was an unreasonable curtailment of the opportunity to exploit the patent caused by the process of obtaining marketing approval for a pharmaceutical product, being the first pharmaceutical product to obtain marketing approval which uses the substance as an active ingredient; and

Patents57 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(ii) the term of the patent has not previously been extended on this ground.

[19/2004]

(2) A delay by the Registrar in granting a patent shall not be treated as an unreasonable delay under subsection (1)(a) unless such requirements as may be prescribed are satisfied.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(3) Where the proprietor of a patent has made an application under subsection (1)(a) and has satisfied the Registrar that there was in fact a particular type of unreasonable delay by the Registrar in granting the patent, the Registrar shall extend the term of the patent by such period as may be prescribed for that type of unreasonable delay.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(4) Where the proprietor of a patent has made an application under subsection (1)(b) and has satisfied the Registrar of the matters referred to in sub‑paragraphs (i) and (ii) of subsection (1)(b), the Registrar may, if the Registrar thinks fit, extend the term of the patent by such period, not exceeding 5 years, as the Registrar may determine.

[19/2004]

(5) A curtailment of the opportunity to exploit a patent, the subject of which includes a substance which is an active ingredient of any pharmaceutical product, caused by the process of obtaining marketing approval for a pharmaceutical product, being the first pharmaceutical product to obtain marketing approval which uses the substance as an active ingredient, shall not be treated as an unreasonable curtailment under subsection (1)(c) unless such requirements as may be prescribed are satisfied.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(6) Subject to subsections (7), (8) and (9), where the proprietor of a patent has made an application under subsection (1)(c) and has satisfied the Registrar that there was in fact an unreasonable curtailment of the opportunity to exploit the patent under subsection (1)(c), the Registrar shall extend the term of the patent by such period as may be prescribed.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(7) The Registrar shall not extend the term of the patent under subsection (6) unless the applicant has procured and submitted to the

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 58

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Registrar a certificate from the relevant authority stating such matters as may be prescribed.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(8) In determining the period by which to extend the term of the patent under subsection (6), the Registrar shall rely on, and shall not be concerned to inquire into the truth of, the statements contained in the certificate from the relevant authority under subsection (7).

[19/2004]

(9) Where the term of a patent has been extended under subsection (6), the protection conferred by the patent during the term of the extension shall apply only to the substance referred to in subsection (1)(c).

[19/2004]

(10) Every application to extend the term of a patent shall be —

(a) made by the proprietor of the patent in the prescribed form within the prescribed period;

(b) filed in the prescribed manner; and

and the Registrar may reject any application that fails to comply with any requirement under this subsection.

[19/2004]

(11) As soon as practicable after the Registrar has extended the term of a patent, he shall —

(a) send to the proprietor of the patent a certificate of extension of patent term in the prescribed form specifying —

(i) the period of the extension; and

(ii) any limitation on the protection conferred by the patent during the term of the extension; and

(b) publish in the journal a notice of the extension. [19/2004]

(12) The proprietor of a patent who has made an application under subsection (1) may withdraw the application by informing the

Patents59 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Registrar in writing of the withdrawal of the application, and any such withdrawal shall not be revocable.

[19/2004]

(13) [Deleted by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(14) [Deleted by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patent not to be impugned for lack of unity

37. No person may in any proceeding object to a patent or to an amendment of a specification of a patent on the ground that the claims contained in the specification of the patent, as they stand or, as the case may be, as proposed to be amended, relate —

(a) to more than one invention; or

(b) to a group of inventions which are not so linked as to form a single inventive concept.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 26]

General power to amend specification after grant

38.—(1) Subject to this section and section 84, the Registrar may, on an application made by the proprietor of a patent, allow the specification of the patent to be amended subject to such conditions, if any, as he thinks fit.

(2) No such amendment shall be allowed under this section where there are pending before the court or the Registrar proceedings in which the validity of the patent may be put in issue.

(3) An amendment of a specification of a patent under this section shall have effect and be deemed always to have had effect from the grant of the patent.

(4) A person may give notice to the Registrar of his opposition to an application under this section by the proprietor of a patent, and if he does so the Registrar shall notify the proprietor and consider the opposition in deciding whether to grant the application. [UK Patents 1977, s. 27]

38A. [Repealed by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 60

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Restoration of lapsed patents

39.—(1) Where a patent has ceased to have effect by reason of a failure to pay any renewal fee, an application for the restoration of the patent may be made to the Registrar within the prescribed period.

(2) An application under this section may be made by the person who was the proprietor of the patent or by any other person who would have been entitled to the patent if it had not ceased to have effect.

(3) Where the patent was held by 2 or more persons jointly, the application may, with the leave of the Registrar, be made by one or more of them without joining the others.

(4) Notice of the application shall be published by the Registrar in the prescribed manner.

(5) If the Registrar is satisfied that the failure of the proprietor of the patent to pay any renewal fee within the prescribed period, or to pay that fee and any prescribed additional fee within the 6 months immediately following the end of that period, was unintentional, the Registrar shall by order restore the patent on payment of any unpaid renewal fee and any prescribed additional fee.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(6) An order under this section may be made subject to such conditions as the Registrar thinks fit (including a condition requiring compliance with any provision of the rules relating to registration which have not been complied with), and if the proprietor of the patent does not comply with any such condition of the order, the Registrar may revoke the order and give such directions consequential on the revocation as he thinks fit.

(7) The effect of an order for the restoration of a patent shall be as provided in subsections (8) to (13).

(8) Anything done under or in relation to the patent during the period between expiry and restoration shall be treated as valid.

(9) Anything done during that period which would have constituted an infringement if the patent had not expired shall be treated as an infringement —

Patents61 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) if done at a time when it was possible for the patent to be renewed under section 36(3);

(b) if it was a continuation or repetition of an earlier infringing act.

(10) If after it was no longer possible for the patent to be so renewed, and before publication of notice of the application for restoration, a person —

(a) began in good faith to do an act which would have constituted an infringement of the patent if it had not expired; or

(b) made in good faith effective and serious preparations to do such an act,

he has the right to continue to do the act or, as the case may be, to do the act, notwithstanding the restoration of the patent.

(11) The right referred to in subsection (10) does not extend to granting a licence to another person to do the act.

(12) If the act was done, or the preparations were made, in the course of a business, the person entitled to the right conferred by subsection (10) may —

(a) authorise the doing of that act by any partner of his for the time being in that business; and

(b) assign that right, or transmit it on death (or in the case of a body corporate on its dissolution), to any person who acquires that part of the business in the course of which the act was done or the preparations were made.

(13) Where a product is disposed of to another in exercise of the rights conferred by subsection (10) or (12), that other and any person claiming through him may deal with the product in the same way as if it had been disposed of by the registered proprietor of the patent.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 62

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(14) Subsections (8) to (13) shall apply in relation to the use of a patent in accordance with section 56 as they apply in relation to infringement of the patent. [UK Patents 1977, ss. 28 and 28A]

[19/2004]

Surrender of patents

40.—(1) The proprietor of a patent may at any time by notice given to the Registrar offer to surrender his patent.

(2) [Deleted by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(3) If the Registrar is satisfied that the patent may properly be surrendered, he may accept the offer and, as from the date when notice of his acceptance is published in the journal, the patent shall cease to have effect, but no action for infringement shall lie in respect of any act done before that date and no right to compensation shall accrue for any use of the patented invention before that date in accordance with section 56. [UK Patents 1977, s. 29]

[19/2004]

PART VIII

PROPERTY IN PATENTS AND APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS AND REGISTRATION

Nature of, and transactions in, patents and applications for patents

41.—(1) Any patent or application for a patent is personal property (without being a thing in action), and any patent or any such application and rights in or under it may be transferred, created or granted in accordance with this section.

(2) Subject to section 46(3), any patent or any such application, or any right in it, may be assigned or mortgaged.

(3) Any patent or any such application or right shall vest by operation of law in the same way as any other personal property and may be vested by an assent of personal representatives.

Patents63 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(4) Subject to section 46(3), a licence may be granted under any patent or any such application for working the invention which is the subject of the patent or the application; and —

(a) to the extent that the licence so provides, a sub‑licence may be granted under any such licence and any such licence or sub‑licence may be assigned or mortgaged; and

(b) any such licence or sub‑licence shall vest by operation of law in the same way as any other personal property and may be vested by an assent of personal representatives.

(5) Subsections (2) to (4) shall have effect subject to the provisions of this Act.

(6) Any of the following transactions, that is to say —

(a) any assignment or mortgage of a patent or any such application, or any right in a patent or any such application;

(b) any assent relating to any patent or any such application or right,

shall be void unless it is in writing and is signed by or on behalf of the assignor or mortgagor (or, in the case of an assent or other transaction by a personal representative, by or on behalf of the personal representative) or in the case of a body corporate is so signed or is under the seal of that body.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(7) An assignment of a patent or any such application or a share in it, and an exclusive licence granted under any patent or any such application, may confer on the assignee or licensee the right of the assignor or licensor to bring proceedings by virtue of section 67 or 76 for a previous infringement or to bring the proceedings under section 58 for a previous act. [UK Patents 1977, s. 30]

42.—(1) The Registrar shall maintain a register of patents in accordance with the rules made by virtue of this section.

[30/2001]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 64

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) Without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act or the rules, the rules may make provision with respect to the following matters, including provision imposing requirements as to any of those matters:

(a) the registration of patents and of published applications for patents;

(b) the registration of transactions, instruments or events affecting rights in or under patents and applications;

(c) the furnishing to the Registrar of any prescribed document or description of documents in connection with any matter which is required to be registered;

(d) the correction of errors in the register and in any document filed at the Registry in connection with registration; and

(e) the publication and advertisement of anything done under this Act or the rules in relation to the register.

(3) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (2)(b), no notice of any implied or constructive trust shall be entered in the register and the Registrar shall not be affected by any such notice.

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 30/04/2014]

(3A) A notice of an express trust or of the beneficiary of an express trust, or both, may be entered in the register; but —

(a) the Registrar shall not be affected by any such notice in the register; and

(b) for the avoidance of doubt, a failure to enter such notice in the register does not affect any rights or duties under the trust.

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 30/04/2014]

(4) The register need not be kept in documentary form.

(5) Subject to the rules, the public shall have a right to inspect the register at the Registry at all convenient times.

(6) Any person who applies for a certified copy of an entry in the register or a certified extract from the register shall be entitled to obtain such a copy or extract on payment of a fee prescribed in relation to certified copies and extracts.

Patents65 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(7) [Deleted by Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(8) Applications under subsection (6) shall be made in such manner as may be prescribed.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(9) In relation to any portion of the register kept otherwise than in documentary form —

(a) the right of inspection conferred by subsection (5) is a right to inspect the material on the register; and

(b) the right to a copy or extract conferred by subsection (6) or the rules is a right to a copy or extract in a form in which it can be taken away and in which it is visible and legible.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 32]

Effect of registration, etc., on rights in patents

43.—(1) Any person who claims to have acquired the property in a patent or application for a patent by virtue of any transaction, instrument or event to which this section applies shall be entitled as against any other person who claims to have acquired that property by virtue of an earlier transaction, instrument or event to which this section applies if, at the time of the later transaction, instrument or event —

(a) the earlier transaction, instrument or event was not registered;

(b) in the case of any application which has not been published, notice of the earlier transaction, instrument or event had not been given to the Registrar; and

(c) in any case, the person claiming under the later transaction, instrument or event did not know of the earlier transaction, instrument or event.

(2) Subsection (1) shall apply equally to the case where any person claims to have acquired any right in or under a patent or application for a patent, by virtue of a transaction, instrument or event to which this section applies, and that right is incompatible with any such right acquired by virtue of an earlier transaction, instrument or event to which this section applies.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 66

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) This section shall apply to the following transactions, instruments and events:

(a) the assignment of a patent or application for a patent, or a right in it;

(b) the mortgage of, or grant of any other security interest in, a patent or application;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(c) the grant or assignment of a licence or sub‑licence, or mortgage of, or grant of any other security interest in, a licence or sub‑licence, under a patent or application;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(d) the death of the proprietor or one of the proprietors of any such patent or application or any person having a right in or under a patent or application and the vesting by an assent of personal representatives of a patent, application or any such right; and

(e) any order or directions of a court or other competent authority —

(i) transferring a patent or application or any right in or under it to any person; or

(ii) that an application should proceed in the name of any person,

and in either case the event by virtue of which the court or authority had power to make any such order or give any such directions.

(4) Where an application for the registration of a transaction, instrument or event has been made, but the transaction, instrument or event has not been registered, then, for the purposes of subsection (1)(a), registration of the application shall be treated as registration of the transaction, instrument or event. [UK Patents 1977, s. 33]

(5) Provision may be made by rules as to the amendment, alteration or removal from the register of any particulars in the register relating to any transaction, instrument or event referred to in subsection (3).

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents67 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Rectification of register

44.—(1) The court may, on the application of any person aggrieved, order the register to be rectified by the making, or the variation or deletion, of any entry in it.

(2) In proceedings under this section, the court may determine any question which may be necessary or expedient to decide in connection with the rectification of the register. [UK Patents 1977, s. 34]

Evidence of register, documents, etc.

45.—(1) The register shall be prima facie evidence of anything required or authorised by this Act or the rules to be registered.

(2) A certificate purporting to be signed by the Registrar and certifying that any entry which he is authorised by this Act or rules to make has or has not been made, or that any other thing which he is so authorised to do has or has not been done, shall be prima facie evidence of the matter so certified.

(3) Each of the following, that is to say —

(a) a copy of an entry in the register or an extract from the register which is supplied under section 42(6);

(b) a copy of any document kept in the Registry or an extract from any such document; or

which purports to be a certified copy or a certified extract shall be admitted in evidence without further proof and without production of the original.

(4) In this section, “certified copy” and “certified extract” mean a copy and an extract certified by the Registrar. [UK Patents 1977, s. 32]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 68

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Co-ownership of patents and applications for patents

46.—(1) Where a patent is granted to 2 or more persons, each of them shall, subject to any agreement to the contrary, be entitled to an equal undivided share in the patent.

(2) Where 2 or more persons are proprietors of a patent, then, subject to this section and subject to any agreement to the contrary—

(a) each of them shall be entitled, by himself or his agents, to do in respect of the invention, for his own benefit and without the consent of or the need to account to the other or others, any act which would, apart from this subsection and section 56, amount to an infringement of the patent; and

(b) any such act shall not amount to an infringement of the patent.

(3) Subject to sections 20 and 47 and to any agreement for the time being in force, where 2 or more persons are proprietors of a patent, one of them shall not without the consent of the other or others grant a licence under the patent or assign or mortgage a share in the patent.

(4) Subject to sections 20 and 47 where 2 or more persons are proprietors of a patent, anyone else may supply one of those persons with the means, relating to an essential element of the invention, for putting the invention into effect, and the supply of those means by virtue of this subsection shall not amount to an infringement of the patent.

(5) Where a patented product is disposed of by any of 2 or more proprietors to any person, that person and any other person claiming through him shall be entitled to deal with the product in the same way as if it had been disposed of by a sole registered proprietor.

(6) Nothing in subsection (1) or (2) shall affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the personal representatives of a deceased person, or their rights or obligations as such.

(7) This section shall have effect in relation to an application for a patent which is filed as it has effect in relation to a patent and —

Patents69 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) references to a patent and a patent being granted shall accordingly include references respectively to any such application and to the application being filed; and

(b) the reference in subsection (5) to a patented product shall be construed accordingly.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 36]

Determination of right to patent after grant

47.—(1) After a patent has been granted for an invention, any person having or claiming a proprietary interest in or under the patent may refer to the Registrar the question —

(a) who is or are the true proprietor or proprietors of the patent;

(b) whether the patent should have been granted to the person or persons to whom it was granted; or

and the Registrar shall determine the question and make such order as he thinks fit to give effect to the determination.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), an order under that subsection may contain provision —

(a) directing that the person by whom the reference is made under that subsection shall be included (whether or not to the exclusion of any other person) among the persons registered as proprietors of the patent;

(b) directing the registration of a transaction, instrument or event by virtue of which that person has acquired any right in or under the patent;

(d) directing the proprietor of the patent or any person having any right in or under the patent to do anything specified in the order as necessary to carry out the other provisions of the order.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 70

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) If any person to whom directions have been given under subsection (2)(d) fails to do anything necessary for carrying out any such directions within 14 days after the date of the order containing the directions, the Registrar may, on an application made to him by any person in whose favour or on whose reference the order containing the directions was made, authorise him to do that thing on behalf of the person to whom the directions were given.

(4) Where the Registrar finds on a reference under this section that the patent was granted to a person not entitled to be granted that patent (whether alone or with other persons) and on an application made under section 80 makes an order on that ground for the conditional or unconditional revocation of the patent, the Registrar may order that the person by whom the application was made or his successor in title may, subject to section 84, make a new application for a patent —

(a) in the case of unconditional revocation, for the whole of the matter comprised in the specification of that patent; and

(b) in the case of conditional revocation, for the matter which in the opinion of the Registrar should be excluded from that specification by amendment under section 83,

and where such a new application is made, it shall be treated as having been filed on the date of filing the application for the patent to which the reference relates.

(5) On any reference under subsection (1) —

(a) no order shall be made under this section transferring the patent to which the reference relates on the ground that the patent was granted to a person not so entitled; and

(b) no order shall be made under subsection (4) on that ground if the reference was made after the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the grant, unless it is shown that any person registered as a proprietor of the patent knew at the time of the grant or, as the case may be, of the transfer of the patent to him that he was not entitled to the patent.

(6) An order under this section shall not be so made as to affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the personal

Patents71 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

representatives of a deceased person, or their rights or obligations as such.

(7) Where a question is referred to the Registrar under this section, an order shall not be made by virtue of subsection (2) or under subsection (4) on the reference unless notice of the reference is given to all persons registered as proprietor of the patent or as having a right in or under the patent, except those who are parties to the reference.

(8) If it appears to the Registrar on a reference under this section that the question referred to him would more properly be determined by the court, he may decline to deal with it and, without prejudice to the court’s jurisdiction to determine any such question and make a declaration, the court shall have jurisdiction to do so.

(9) The court shall not in the exercise of any such declaratory jurisdiction determine a question whether a patent was granted to a person not entitled to be granted the patent if the proceedings in which the jurisdiction is invoked were commenced after the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the grant of the patent, unless it is shown that any person registered as a proprietor of the patent knew at the time of the grant or, as the case may be, of the transfer of the patent to him that he was not entitled to the patent. [UK Patents 1977, s. 37]

Effect of transfer of patent under section 47

48.—(1) Where an order is made under section 47 that a patent shall be transferred from any person or persons (the old proprietor or proprietors) to one or more persons (whether or not including an old proprietor) then, except in a case falling within subsection (2), any licences or other rights granted or created by the old proprietor or proprietors shall, subject to section 43 and to the provisions of the order, continue in force and be treated as granted by the person or persons to whom the patent is ordered to be transferred (the new proprietor or proprietors).

(2) Where an order is so made that a patent shall be transferred from the old proprietor or proprietors to one or more persons none of whom was an old proprietor (on the ground that the patent was granted to a person not entitled to be granted the patent), any licences or other

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 72

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

rights in or under the patent shall, subject to the provisions of the order and subsection (3), lapse on the registration of that person or those persons as the new proprietor or proprietors of the patent.

(3) Where an order is so made that —

(a) a patent shall be transferred as mentioned in subsection (2); or

(b) a person other than an old proprietor may make a new application for a patent,

and before the reference of the question under that section resulting in the making of any such order is registered, the old proprietor or proprietors or a licensee of the patent, acting in good faith —

(i) worked the invention in question in Singapore; or

(ii) made effective and serious preparations to do so,

the old proprietor or proprietors or the licensee shall, on making a request to the new proprietor or proprietors within the prescribed period, be entitled to be granted a licence (but not an exclusive licence) to continue working or, as the case may be, to work the invention, so far as it is the subject of the new application.

(4) Any such licence shall be granted for a reasonable period and on reasonable terms.

(5) The new proprietor or proprietors of the patent or any person claiming that he is entitled to be granted any such licence may refer to the Registrar the question whether that person is so entitled and whether any such period is or terms are reasonable.

(6) The Registrar shall determine the question referred to in subsection (5) and may, if he considers it appropriate, order the grant of such a licence. [UK Patents 1977, s. 38]

Patents73 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART IX

EMPLOYEES’ INVENTIONS

Right to employees’ inventions

49.—(1) Notwithstanding anything in any rule of law, an invention made by an employee shall, as between him and his employer, be taken to belong to his employer for the purposes of this Act and all other purposes if —

(a) the invention was made in the course of the normal duties of the employee or in the course of duties falling outside his normal duties, but specifically assigned to him, and the circumstances in either case were such that an invention might reasonably be expected to result from the carrying out of his duties; or

(b) the invention was made in the course of the duties of the employee and, at the time of making the invention, because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising from the nature of his duties he had a special obligation to further the interests of the employer’s undertaking.

(2) Any other invention made by an employee shall, as between him and his employer, be taken for those purposes to belong to the employee.

(3) Where by virtue of this section an invention belongs, as between him and his employer, to an employee, nothing done —

(a) by or on behalf of the employee or any person claiming under him for the purposes of pursuing an application for a patent; or

(b) by any person for the purpose of performing or working the invention,

shall be taken to infringe any copyright or design right to which, as between him and his employer, his employer is entitled in any model or document relating to the invention.

(4) In subsection (3), the reference to application for a patent includes an application for other protection for an invention, and

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 74

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

includes an application for a patent or any other protection under the law of a country other than Singapore or under any treaty to which Singapore is a party. [UK Patents 1977, s. 39]

Supplementary provisions

50.—(1) This Part shall not apply to an invention made by an employee unless at the time he made the invention one of the following conditions was satisfied in his case:

(a) he was mainly employed in Singapore; or

(b) he was not mainly employed anywhere or his place of employment could not be determined, but his employer had a place of business in Singapore to which the employee was attached, whether or not he was also attached elsewhere.

(2) In this Part, except so far as the context otherwise requires, references to the making of an invention by an employee are references to his making it alone or jointly with any other person, but do not include references to his merely contributing advice or other assistance in the making of an invention by another employee.

(3) Any references in section 49 to a patent and to a patent being granted are respectively references to a patent or other protection and to its being granted whether under the law of Singapore or the law in force in any other country or under any treaty or international convention.

(4) Nothing in this Part shall be construed as precluding the operation of an agreement or a contract in relation to the right to an invention. [UK Patents 1977, s. 43]

Patents75 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART X

CONTRACTS AS TO PATENTED PRODUCTS

Application of this Part

50A. This Part shall apply only to —

(a) any contract for the supply of a patented product;

(b) any licence to work a patented invention; and

that was entered into or granted on or after 23rd February 1995 but before the date of commencement of section 3 of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2008.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Avoidance of certain restrictive conditions

51.—(1) Subject to this section, any condition or term of a contract for the supply of a patented product or of a licence to work a patented invention, or of a contract relating to any such supply or licence, shall be void in so far as it purports —

(a) in the case of a contract for supply, to require the person supplied to acquire from the supplier, or his nominee, or prohibit him from acquiring from any specified person, or from acquiring except from the supplier or his nominee, anything other than the patented product;

(b) in the case of a licence to work a patented invention, to require the licensee to acquire from the licensor or his nominee, or prohibit him from acquiring from any specified person, or from acquiring except from the licensor or his nominee, anything other than the product which is the patented invention or (if it is a process) other than any product obtained directly by means of the process or to which the process has been applied; or

(c) in either case, to prohibit the person supplied or the licensee from using articles (whether patented products or not) which are not supplied by, or any patented process which does not belong to, the supplier or licensor, or his nominee,

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 76

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

or to restrict the right of the person supplied or the licensee to use any such articles or process.

(2) In proceedings against any person for infringement of a patent, it shall be a defence to prove that at the time of the infringement there was in force a contract relating to the patent made by or with the consent of the plaintiff or a licence under the patent granted by him or with his consent and containing in either case a condition or term void by virtue of this section.

(3) A condition or term of a contract or licence shall not be void by virtue of this section if —

(a) at the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence, the supplier or licensor was willing to supply the product, or grant a licence to work the invention, as the case may be, to the person supplied or the licensee, on reasonable terms specified in the contract or licence and without any such condition or term as is mentioned in subsection (1); and

(b) the person supplied or the licensee is entitled under the contract or licence to relieve himself of his liability to observe the condition or term on giving to the other party 3 months’ notice in writing, and subject to payment to that other party of such compensation (being, in the case of a contract to supply, a lump sum or rent for the residue of the term of the contract and, in the case of a licence, a royalty for the residue of the term of the licence) as may be determined by an arbitrator appointed by the Minister.

(4) If in any proceedings it is alleged that any condition or term of a contract or licence is void by virtue of this section, it shall lie on the supplier or licensor to prove the matters set out in subsection (3)(a).

(5) A condition or term of a contract or licence shall not be void by virtue of this section by reason only that it prohibits any person from selling goods other than those supplied by a specific person or, in the case of a contract for the hiring of or licence to use a patented product, that it reserves to the bailor or licensor, or his nominee, the right to

Patents77 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

supply such new parts of the patented product as may be required to put or keep it in repair. [UK Patents 1977, s. 44]

Determination of parts of certain contracts

52.—(1) Any contract for the supply of a patented product or licence to work a patented invention, or contract relating to any such supply or licence, may at any time after the patent or all the patents by which the product or invention was protected at the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence has or have ceased to be in force, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the contract or licence or in any other contract, be determined, to the extent (and only to the extent) that the contract or licence relates to the product or invention, by either party on giving 3 months’ notice in writing to the other party.

(2) In subsection (1), “patented product” and “patented invention” include respectively a product and an invention which is the subject of an application for a patent, and that subsection shall apply in relation to a patent by which any such product or invention was protected and which was granted after the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence, on an application which had been filed before that time, as it applies to a patent in force at that time.

(3) If, on an application under this section made by either party to a contract or licence falling within subsection (1), the court is satisfied that, in consequence of the patent or patents ceasing to be in force, it would be unjust to require the applicant to continue to comply with all the terms and conditions of the contract or licence, the court may make such order varying those terms or conditions as, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it thinks just as between the parties.

(4) Without prejudice to any other right of recovery, nothing in subsection (1) shall be taken to entitle any person to recover property let under a hire-purchase agreement within the meaning of the Hire- Purchase Act (Cap. 125).

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 78

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(5) This section shall be without prejudice to any rule of law relating to the frustration of contracts and any right of determining a contract or licence exercisable apart from this section. [UK Patents 1977, s. 45]

PART XI

LICENCES OF RIGHT AND COMPULSORY LICENCES

Licences of right

53.—(1) At any time after the grant of a patent, its proprietor may apply to the Registrar for an entry to be made in the register to the effect that licences under the patent are to be available as of right.

(2) Where an application under subsection (1) is made, the Registrar shall give notice of the application to any person registered as having a right in or under the patent and, if satisfied that the proprietor of the patent is not precluded by contract from granting licences under the patent, the Registrar shall make that entry.

(3) Where an entry under subsection (2) is made in respect of a patent —

(a) any person shall, at any time after the entry is made, be entitled as of right to a licence under the patent on such terms as may be settled by agreement or, in default of agreement, by the Registrar on the application of the proprietor of the patent or the person requiring the licence;

(b) the Registrar may, on the application of the holder of any licence granted under the patent before the entry was made, order the licence to be exchanged for a licence of right on terms so settled;

(c) if, in proceedings for infringement of the patent, the defendant undertakes to take a licence on such terms, no injunction shall be granted against him and the amount (if any) recoverable against him by way of damages shall not exceed twice the amount which would have been payable by him as licensee if such a licence on those terms had been granted before the earliest infringement; and

Patents79 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(d) the renewal fee payable in respect of the patent after the date of the entry shall be half the fee which would be payable if the entry had not been made.

(4) An undertaking under subsection (3)(c) may be given at any time before final order in the proceedings, without any admission of liability.

(5) The licensee under a licence of right may (unless, in the case of a licence the terms of which are settled by agreement, the licence otherwise expressly provides) request the proprietor of the patent to take proceedings to prevent any infringement of the patent.

(6) If the proprietor refuses or neglects to take proceedings under subsection (5) within 2 months after being so requested, the licensee may institute proceedings for the infringement in his own name as if he were the proprietor, making the proprietor a defendant.

(7) A proprietor so added as defendant shall not be liable for any costs or expenses unless he enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings. [UK Patents 1977, s. 46]

Cancellation of entry made under section 53

54.—(1) At any time after an entry has been made under section 53 in respect of a patent, the proprietor of the patent may apply to the Registrar for cancellation of the entry.

(2) Where an application under subsection (1) is made and the balance paid of all renewal fees which would have been payable if the entry had not been made, the Registrar may cancel the entry if satisfied that there is no existing licence under the patent or that all licensees under the patent consent to the application.

(3) Within the prescribed period after an entry had been made under section 53 in respect of a patent, any person who claims that the proprietor of the patent is, and was at the time of the entry, precluded by a contract in which the claimant is interested from granting licences under the patent may apply to the Registrar for cancellation of the entry.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 80

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(4) Where the Registrar is satisfied, on an application under subsection (3), that the proprietor of the patent is and was so precluded, he shall cancel the entry.

(5) The proprietor shall be liable to pay, within the prescribed period, a sum equal to the balance of all renewal fees which would have been payable if the entry had not been made, and the patent shall cease to have effect at the expiration of that period if that sum is not so paid.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(6) Where an entry is cancelled under this section, the rights and liabilities of the proprietor of the patent shall after the cancellation be the same as if the entry had not been made.

(7) Where an application has been made under this section —

(a) in the case of an application under subsection (1), any person; and

(b) in the case of an application under subsection (3), the proprietor of the patent,

may, within the prescribed period, give notice to the Registrar of opposition to the cancellation.

(8) The Registrar shall, in considering the application made under this section, determine whether the opposition is justified. [UK Patents 1977, s. 47]

Compulsory licences

55.—(1) Any interested person may apply to the court for the grant of a licence under a patent on the ground that the grant of the licence is necessary to remedy an anti-competitive practice.

[19/2004]

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the court may determine that the grant of a licence is necessary to remedy an anti-competitive practice if —

(a) there is a market for the patented invention in Singapore;

(b) that market —

(i) is not being supplied; or

Patents81 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(ii) is not being supplied on reasonable terms; and

(c) the court is of the view that the proprietor of the patent has no valid reason for failing to supply that market with the patented invention, whether directly or through a licensee, on reasonable terms.

[19/2004]

(3) Subject to this section, if the court is satisfied that the ground referred to in subsection (1) is established, the court may make an order for the grant of a licence in accordance with the application upon such terms as the court thinks fit.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(4) A licence granted under this section —

(a) is not exclusive; and

(b) shall not be assigned otherwise than in connection with the goodwill of the business in which the patented invention is used.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(5) Any licence granted under this section may, on the application of any interested party, be terminated by the court where the court is satisfied that the ground upon which the licence was granted has ceased to exist and is unlikely to recur.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(6) Where a licence is granted under this section to any person, the person shall pay such remuneration to the patentee as may be agreed, or as may be determined by a method agreed between the person and the patentee or, in default of agreement, as is determined by the court on the application of the person or the patentee.

[40/95]

(7) The powers of the court on an application under this section shall be exercised with a view to securing that the inventor or other person beneficially entitled to a patent shall receive reasonable remuneration having regard to the economic value of the licence.

[40/95]

(8) No order shall be made in pursuance of any application under this section which would be at variance with any treaty or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 82

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

international convention relating to patents to which Singapore is a party.

[40/95]

PART XII

USE OF PATENTED INVENTIONS FOR SERVICES OF GOVERNMENT

Use of patented inventions by Government and authorised parties

56.—(1) Subject to sections 60, 61 and 62, but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, the Government and any party authorised in writing by the Government may do anything in relation to a patented invention —

(a) for a public non-commercial purpose; or

(b) for or during a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency,

and anything done by virtue of this section shall not amount to an infringement of the patent.

[19/2004]

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

(1A) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), subject to sections 60, 61 and 62, but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, the Government and any party authorised in writing by the Government may import any relevant health product, and do anything in relation to any relevant health product so imported, for or during a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, if the Government has given the Council for TRIPS a relevant notification in relation to the relevant health product.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

(2) For the purposes of this section and section 57 —

(a) any use of an invention for the supply to the government of any country outside Singapore, in pursuance of any agreement or arrangement between the Government of Singapore and the government of that country, of articles required for the defence of that country shall be deemed to

Patents83 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

be a use of the invention for a public non-commercial purpose; and

(b) the power of the Government or any party authorised by the Government to do anything in accordance with this section shall not, in the case of a patent relating to an integrated circuit, extend to sale of the invention to the public.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(3) The purchaser of any article sold in the exercise of the powers conferred by this section, and any person claiming through the purchaser, shall have power to deal with it in the same manner as if the patent were held on behalf of the Government.

[40/95]

(4) In this section —

“integrated circuit” means a product, in its final or an intermediate form, in which the elements, at least one of which is an active element, and some or all of the interconnections are integrally formed in and on, or in or on, a piece of material and which is intended to perform an electronic function;

“relevant notification” means a notification that satisfies the requirements of —

(a) paragraph 2(a) of the Doha Declaration Implementation Decision; or

(b) paragraph 2(a) of the Annex to the TRIPS Agreement.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Rights of third parties in respect of Government use

57.—(1) In relation to —

(a) anything done in accordance with section 56 by the Government or any party authorised in writing by the Government; or

(b) anything done to the order of the Government —

(i) for a public non-commercial purpose; or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 84

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(ii) for or during a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency,

by the proprietor of a patent in respect of the patented invention or by the proprietor of an application for a patent in respect of the invention for which the application has been filed and is still pending,

the provisions of any licence, assignment or agreement to which this subsection applies shall, subject to sections 60, 61 and 62, be of no effect so far as those provisions restrict or regulate the working of the invention, or the use of any model, document or information relating to it, or provide for the making of payments in respect of, or calculated by reference to, such working or use.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(2) The reproduction or publication of any model or document in connection with the said working or use shall not be deemed to be an infringement of any copyright or design right subsisting in the model or document.

[40/95]

(3) Subsection (1) shall apply to any licence, assignment or agreement which is made, whether before or after 23rd February 1995, between (on the one hand) any person who is a proprietor of or an applicant for the patent, or anyone who derives title from any such person or from whom such person derives title, and (on the other hand) any person other than the Government.

[19/2004]

References of disputes as to Government use

58.—(1) Any dispute as to the exercise by the Government or a party authorised by the Government of the powers conferred by, or as to the terms for doing anything in accordance with, section 56 may be referred to the court by either party to the dispute after a patent has been granted for the invention.

[19/2004]

(2) In determining any dispute referred to the court under this section, the court shall have regard to —

(a) any benefit or compensation that the patentee of the invention may have received, or may be entitled to receive,

Patents85 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

directly or indirectly, from the Government or any party authorised by the Government in respect of the patented invention; and

(b) the need to ensure that the patentee shall receive reasonable remuneration having regard to the economic value of the patented invention.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(3) If the validity of a patent is put in issue in proceedings under this section and it is found that the patent is only partially valid, the court may, subject to subsection (4), grant relief to the proprietor of the patent in respect of that part of the patent which is found to be valid and to have been used in accordance with section 56.

[19/2004]

(4) Where in any such proceedings it is found that a patent is only partially valid, the court shall not grant relief by way of costs or expenses except where the proprietor of the patent proves that the specification of the patent was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge, and in that event the court may grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is valid and has been so used, subject to the discretion of the court as to costs and expenses.

(5) As a condition of any such relief, the court may direct that the specification of the patent shall be amended to its satisfaction upon an application made for that purpose under section 83, and an application may be so made accordingly, whether or not all other issues in the proceedings have been determined.

(6) In any proceedings under this section, the court may at any time order the whole proceedings or any question or issue of fact arising in them to be referred, on such terms as the court may direct, to an arbitrator; and references to the court in this section shall be construed accordingly.

(7) One of the 2 or more joint proprietors of a patent or an application for a patent may, without the concurrence of the others, refer a dispute to the court under this section, but shall not do so unless the others are made parties to the proceedings; but any of the others if made a defendant shall not be liable for any costs or expenses unless he enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 86

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

59. [Repealed by Act 19/2004]

Nature and scope of rights under section 56

60.—(1) The right to use a patented invention under section 56 —

(a) is not exclusive;

(b) shall not be assigned otherwise than in connection with the goodwill of the business in which the patented invention is used; and

(c) is, notwithstanding subsection (2)(a) of section 56, limited to the supply of the patented invention predominantly in Singapore by the Government or a party authorised by the Government under that section.

[40/95; 19/2004]

(1A) The right under section 56 to use a relevant health product which is imported under section 56(1A) does not include a right to export the relevant health product.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

(2) The right to use a patented invention under section 56 may, on the application of any interested party, be terminated by the court, where the court is satisfied that the circumstances that gave rise to the right to use the patented invention have ceased to exist and are unlikely to recur.

[40/95]

(3) Where the court has terminated the right under section 56 to use a patented invention, the court may make such consequential orders as it thinks necessary.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Duty to inform patentee

61.—(1) Where any thing set out in section 66(1) is done in relation to a patented invention by the Government or a party authorised in writing by the Government for a public non-commercial purpose, the Government department that did or authorised the doing of the thing shall inform the patentee promptly of the doing of the thing.

[19/2004]

Patents87 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) Where any thing set out in section 66(1) is done in relation to a patented invention by the Government or a party authorised in writing by the Government for or during a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, the Government department that did or authorised the doing of the thing shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, inform the patentee of the doing of the thing.

[19/2004]

Patentee entitled to remuneration

62.—(1) Subject to subsection (2), where an act is done under section 56, the Government shall pay such remuneration to the patentee as may be agreed, or as may be determined by a method agreed, between the Government and the patentee having regard to the economic value of the patented invention or as may, in default of agreement, be determined by the court under section 58.

(2) No remuneration shall be payable under subsection (1) in respect of the import or subsequent use under section 56(1A) of any relevant health product, if the patentee has received or will receive any other remuneration in respect of that relevant health product.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

63. [Section number not in use]

64. [Section number not in use]

65. [Section number not in use]

PART XIII

INFRINGEMENT OF PATENTS

Meaning of infringement

66.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person infringes a patent for an invention if, but only if, while the patent is in force, he does any of the following things in Singapore in relation to the invention without the consent of the proprietor of the patent:

(a) where the invention is a product, he makes, disposes of, offers to dispose of, uses or imports the product or keeps it whether for disposal or otherwise;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 88

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) where the invention is a process, he uses the process or he offers it for use in Singapore when he knows, or it is obvious to a reasonable person in the circumstances, that its use without the consent of the proprietor would be an infringement of the patent;

(c) where the invention is a process, he disposes of, offers to dispose of, uses or imports any product obtained directly by means of that process or keeps any such product whether for disposal or otherwise.

(2) An act which, apart from this subsection, would constitute an infringement of a patent for an invention shall not be so if —

(a) it is done privately and for purposes which are not commercial;

(b) it is done for experimental purposes relating to the subject- matter of the invention;

(c) it consists of the extemporaneous preparation of a medicine for an individual in accordance with a prescription given by a registered medical or dental practitioner or consists of dealing with a medicine so prepared;

(d) it consists of the use of a product or process in the body or operation of a relevant aircraft, hovercraft or vehicle which has temporarily or accidentally entered or is crossing Singapore (including the air space above it and its territorial waters) or the use of accessories for such a relevant aircraft, hovercraft or vehicle;

(e) it consists of the use, exclusively for the needs of a relevant ship, of a product or process in the body of the ship or in its machinery, tackle, apparatus or other accessories, in a case where the ship has temporarily or accidentally entered the territorial waters of Singapore;

(f) it consists of the use of an exempted aircraft which has lawfully entered or is lawfully crossing Singapore as mentioned in paragraph (d) or of the importation into Singapore, or the use or storage, of any part or accessory for that aircraft;

Patents89 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(g) subject to subsections (3) and (5A), it consists of the import, use or disposal of, or the offer to dispose of, any patented product or any product obtained by means of a patented process or to which a patented process has been applied, which is produced by or with the consent (conditional or otherwise) of the proprietor of the patent or any person licensed by him, and for this purpose “patent” includes a patent granted in any country outside Singapore in respect of the same or substantially the same invention as that for which a patent is granted under this Act and “patented product”, “patented process” and “licensed” shall be construed accordingly;

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

(h) it consists of the doing of any thing set out in subsection (1) in relation to the subject-matter of the patent to support any application for marketing approval for a pharmaceutical product, provided that any thing produced to support the application is not —

(i) made, used or sold in Singapore; or

(ii) exported outside Singapore,

other than for purposes related to meeting the requirements for marketing approval for that pharmaceutical product; or

(i) subject to subsection (5A), it consists of the import, disposal or offer to dispose of a patented pharmaceutical product for use by or on a specific patient in Singapore, or the use of that product by or on that patient, where —

(i) that product is required for use by or on that patient;

(ii) the relevant authority has granted approval specifically for the import of that product for use by or on that patient; and

(iii) that product was produced by or with the consent (conditional or otherwise) of the proprietor of the patent or any person licensed by him (and for this purpose “patent” includes a patent granted in any country outside Singapore in respect of the same or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 90

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

substantially the same product and “licensed” shall be construed accordingly).

[19/2004]

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

(3) Subsection (2)(g) shall not apply to the import of any patented pharmaceutical product by any person (referred to in this subsection and subsection (4) as the importer) if —

(a) the product has not previously been sold or distributed in Singapore by or with the consent (conditional or otherwise) of the proprietor of the patent or any person licensed by the proprietor of the patent to sell or distribute the product in Singapore;

(b) the import of the product by the importer would result in the product being distributed in breach of a contract between —

(i) the proprietor of the patent; and

(ii) any person licensed by the proprietor of the patent to distribute the product outside Singapore; and

[19/2004]

(4) For the purposes of subsection (3), where the importer has received a written notice containing the prescribed particulars, he shall be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the matters referred to in subsection (3)(b).

[19/2004]

(5) For the avoidance of doubt, in subsection (3), “patent” does not include a patent granted in any country outside Singapore in respect of the same or substantially the same product and “licensed” shall be construed accordingly.

[19/2004]

(5A) Subsection (2)(g) and (i) shall not apply to the import or sale of, or the offer to sell, any relevant health product produced for export to any country, other than Singapore, which is an eligible importing member of the World Trade Organisation.

[18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Patents91 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(6) In this section —

“eligible importing member”, in relation to the World Trade Organisation, means a member of the World Trade Organisation which —

(a) is a least-developed country; or

(b) has given the Council for TRIPS the notification referred to in —

(i) paragraph 1(b) of the Doha Declaration Implementation Decision; or

(ii) paragraph 1(b) of the Annex to the TRIPS Agreement;

“exempted aircraft” means an aircraft to which section 5 of the Air Navigation Act (Cap. 6) applies;

“relevant ship” and “relevant aircraft, hovercraft or vehicle” mean, respectively, a ship and an aircraft, a hovercraft or a vehicle registered in, or belonging to, any country, other than Singapore, which is —

(a) a party to the Paris Convention; or

(b) a member of the World Trade Organisation. [18/2008 wef 01/12/2008]

Proceedings for infringement of patent

67.—(1) Subject to this Part, civil proceedings may be brought in the court by the proprietor of a patent in respect of any act alleged to infringe the patent and (without prejudice to any other jurisdiction of the court) in those proceedings a claim may be made —

(a) for an injunction restraining the defendant from any apprehended act of infringement;

(b) for an order for him to deliver up or destroy any patented product in relation to which the patent is infringed or any article in which that product is inextricably comprised or any material and implement the predominant use of which has been in the creation of the infringing product;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 92

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(d) for an account of the profits derived by him from the infringement; and

(e) for a declaration that the patent is valid and has been infringed by him.

[40/95]

(2) The court shall not, in respect of the same infringement, both award the proprietor of a patent damages and order that he shall be given an account of the profits.

(3) The proprietor of a patent and any other person may, by agreement with each other, refer to the Registrar the question whether that other person has infringed the patent and on the reference, the proprietor of the patent may make any claim mentioned in subsection (1)(c) or (e).

(4) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires —

(a) any reference to proceedings for infringement and the bringing of such proceedings includes a reference to a reference under subsection (3) and the making of such a reference;

(b) any reference to a plaintiff includes a reference to the proprietor of the patent; and

(5) If it appears to the Registrar on a reference under subsection (3) that the question referred to him would more properly be determined by the court, he may decline to deal with it and the court shall have jurisdiction to determine the question as if the reference were proceedings brought in the court.

(6) Subject to this Part, in determining whether or not to grant any kind of relief claimed under this section and the extent of the relief granted, the court or the Registrar shall apply the principles applied by the court in relation to that kind of relief immediately before 23rd February 1995. [UK Patents 1977, s. 61]

Patents93 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Reversal of burden of proof

68.—(1) In any proceedings for the infringement of a patent, where the subject-matter of the patent is a process for obtaining a new product, the burden of proving that a product is not made by the process shall be on the alleged infringer if the product is new or a substantial likelihood exists that the product is made by the process and the proprietor of the patent has been unable through reasonable efforts to determine the process actually used.

(2) In considering whether a party has discharged the burden imposed upon him by this section, the court shall not require him to disclose any manufacturing or commercial secret if it appears to the court that it would be unreasonable to do so. [UK Patents 1977, s. 100]

Restrictions on relief for infringement

69.—(1) In proceedings for infringement of a patent, damages shall not be awarded and no order shall be made for an account of profits against a defendant who proves that at the date of the infringement he was not aware, and had no reasonable grounds for supposing, that the patent existed.

[19/2004]

(2) A person shall not be taken to have been aware or to have had reasonable grounds for supposing by reason only of the application to a product of the word “patent” or “patented”, or any word or words expressing or implying that a patent has been obtained for the product, unless the number of the patent accompanied the word or words.

(3) In proceedings for infringement of a patent, the court or the Registrar may, if it or he thinks fit, refuse to award any damages, make an order for an account of profits or grant any other relief (including, in proceedings before the court, an injunction) in respect of an infringement committed during any further period specified under section 36(3), but before the payment of the renewal fee and any additional fee prescribed for the purposes of section 36(3).

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(4) Where an amendment of the specification of a patent has been allowed under any of the provisions of this Act, the court or the

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 94

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Registrar shall not, in proceedings for an infringement of the patent committed before the decision to allow the amendment, award any damages, make an order for an account of profits or grant any other relief (including, in proceedings before the court, an injunction) unless the court or the Registrar is satisfied that the specification of the patent as published was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge. [UK Patents 1977, s. 62]

[19/2004]

Relief for infringement of partially valid patent

70.—(1) If the validity of a patent is put in issue in proceedings for infringement of the patent and it is found that the patent is only partially valid, the court or the Registrar may, subject to subsection (2), grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is found to be valid and infringed.

(2) Where in any such proceedings it is found that a patent is only partially valid, the court or the Registrar shall not grant relief by way of damages, costs or expenses, except where the plaintiff proves that the specification for the patent was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge, and in that event the court or the Registrar may grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is valid and infringed, subject to the discretion of the court or the Registrar as to costs or expenses and as to the date from which damages should be reckoned.

(3) As a condition of relief under this section, the court or the Registrar may direct that the specification of the patent shall be amended to its or his satisfaction upon an application made for that purpose under section 83, and an application may be so made accordingly, whether or not all other issues in the proceedings have been determined. [UK Patents 1977, s. 63]

Right to continue use begun before priority date

71.—(1) Where a patent is granted for an invention, a person who in Singapore before the priority date of the invention —

Patents95 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) does in good faith an act which would constitute an infringement of the patent if it were in force; or

(b) makes in good faith effective and serious preparations to do such an act,

has the right to continue to do the act or, as the case may be, to do the act, notwithstanding the grant of the patent.

(2) The right conferred by subsection (1) shall not extend to granting a licence to another person to do the act.

(3) If the act was done, or the preparations were made, in the course of a business, the person entitled to the right conferred by subsection (1) may —

(a) authorise the doing of that act by any partner of his for the time being in that business; and

(b) assign that right, or transmit it on death (or in the case of a body corporate on its dissolution) to any person who acquires that part of the business in the course of which the act was done or the preparations were made.

(4) Where a product is disposed of to another in exercise of the rights conferred by subsection (1) or (3), that other and any person claiming through him may deal with the product in the same way as if it had been disposed of by the registered proprietor of the patent. [UK Patents 1977, s. 64]

Certificate of contested validity of patent

72.—(1) Where in any proceedings before the court or the Registrar the validity of a patent to any extent is contested and that patent is found by the court or the Registrar to be wholly or partially valid, the court or the Registrar may certify the finding and the fact that the validity of the patent was so contested.

(2) Where a certificate is granted under this section, then, if in any subsequent proceedings before the court or the Registrar for infringement of the patent or for revocation of the patent, a final order or judgment is made or given in favour of the party relying on the validity of the patent as found in the earlier proceedings, that party shall, unless the court or the Registrar otherwise directs, be entitled to

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 96

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

his costs or expenses as between solicitor and own client other than the costs or expenses of any appeal in the subsequent proceedings. [UK Patents 1977, s. 65]

Proceedings for infringement by co-owner

73.—(1) In the application of section 66 to a patent of which there are 2 or more joint proprietors, the reference to the proprietor shall be construed —

(a) in relation to any act, as a reference to that proprietor or those proprietors who, by virtue of section 46 or any agreement referred to in that section, is or are entitled to do that act without its amounting to an infringement; and

(b) in relation to any consent, as a reference to that proprietor or those proprietors who, by virtue of section 46 or any such agreement, is or are the proper person or persons to give the requisite consent.

(2) One of 2 or more joint proprietors of a patent may without the concurrence of the others bring proceedings in respect of an act alleged to infringe the patent, but shall not do so unless the others are made parties to the proceedings; but any of the others if made a defendant shall not be liable for any costs or expenses unless he enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings. [UK Patents 1977, s. 66]

Proceedings for infringement by exclusive licensee

74.—(1) The holder of an exclusive licence under a patent shall have the same right as the proprietor of the patent to bring proceedings in respect of any infringement of the patent committed after the date of the licence; and references to the proprietor of the patent in this Act relating to infringement shall be construed accordingly.

[19/2004]

(2) In awarding damages or granting any other relief in any such proceedings, the court or the Registrar shall take into consideration any loss suffered or likely to be suffered by the exclusive licensee as such as a result of the infringement, or, as the case may be, the profits

Patents97 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

derived from the infringement, so far as it constitutes an infringement of the rights of the exclusive licensee as such.

(3) In any proceedings taken by an exclusive licensee by virtue of this section, the proprietor of the patent need not be made a party to the proceedings, but if made a defendant shall not be liable for any costs or expenses unless he enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings. [UK Patents 1977, s. 67]

[19/2004]

Effect of non-registration on infringement proceedings

75. Where by virtue of a transaction, instrument or event to which section 43 applies a person becomes the proprietor or one of the proprietors or an exclusive licensee of a patent and the patent is subsequently infringed, the court or the Registrar shall not award him damages or order that he be given an account of the profits in respect of such a subsequent infringement occurring before the transaction, instrument or event is registered unless —

(a) the transaction, instrument or event is registered within the period of 6 months beginning with its date; or

(b) the court or the Registrar is satisfied that it was not practicable to register the transaction, instrument or event before the end of that period and that it was registered as soon as practicable thereafter.

[UK Patents 1977, s. 68]

Infringement of rights conferred by publication of application

76.—(1) Where an application for a patent for an invention is published, then, subject to this section, the applicant shall have, as from the publication and until the grant of the patent, the same right as he would have had, if the patent had been granted on the date of the publication of the application, to bring proceedings in the court or before the Registrar for damages in respect of any act which would have infringed the patent.

(2) References in sections 66 to 69 and 73 to 75 to a patent and the proprietor of a patent shall be respectively construed as including

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 98

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

references to any such application and the applicant, and references to a patent being in force, being granted, being valid or existing shall be construed accordingly.

(3) The applicant shall be entitled to bring proceedings by virtue of this section in respect of any act only —

(a) after the patent has been granted; and

(b) if the act would, if the patent had been granted on the date of the publication of the application, have infringed not only the patent, but also the claims (as interpreted by the description and any drawings referred to in the description or claims) in the form in which they were contained in the application immediately before the preparations for its publication were completed by the Registry.

(4) Section 69(3) and (4) shall not apply to an infringement of the rights conferred by this section but in considering the amount of any damages for such an infringement, the court or the Registrar shall consider whether or not it would have been reasonable to expect, from a consideration of the application as published under section 27, that a patent would be granted conferring on the proprietor of the patent protection from an act of the same description as that found to infringe those rights, and if the court or the Registrar finds that it would not have been reasonable, it or he shall reduce the damages to such an amount as it or he thinks just. [UK Patents 1977, s. 69]

Remedy for groundless threats of infringement proceedings

77.—(1) Where a person (whether or not the proprietor of, or entitled to any right in, a patent) by circulars, advertisements or otherwise threatens another person with proceedings for any infringement of a patent, a person aggrieved by the threats (whether or not he is the person to whom the threats are made) may, subject to subsection (4), bring proceedings in the court against the person making the threats, claiming any relief mentioned in subsection (3).

(2) In any such proceedings, the plaintiff shall, if he proves that the threats were so made and satisfies the court that he is a person aggrieved by them, be entitled to the relief claimed unless —

Patents99 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(a) the defendant proves that the acts in respect of which proceedings were threatened constitute or, if done, would constitute an infringement of a patent; and

(b) the patent alleged to be infringed is not shown by the plaintiff to be invalid in a relevant respect.

(3) The said relief is —

(a) a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustifiable;

(b) an injunction against the continuance of the threats; and

(4) Proceedings may not be brought under this section for a threat to bring proceedings for an infringement alleged to consist of making or importing a product for disposal or of using a process.

(5) It is hereby declared that a mere notification of the existence of a patent does not constitute a threat of proceedings within the meaning of this section.

(6) Nothing in this section shall render an advocate and solicitor or any other person liable to an action under this section in respect of an act done by the advocate and solicitor or the other person in his professional capacity on behalf of a client. [UK Patents 1977, s. 70]

Declaration as to non-infringement

78.—(1) Without prejudice to the jurisdiction of the court to make a declaration apart from this section, a declaration that an act does not, or a proposed act would not, constitute an infringement of a patent may be made by the court or the Registrar in proceedings between the person doing or proposing to do the act and the proprietor of the patent, notwithstanding that no assertion to the contrary has been made by the proprietor, if it is shown —

(a) that that person has applied in writing to the proprietor for a written acknowledgment to the effect of the declaration claimed, and has furnished him with full particulars in writing of the act in question; and

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 100

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) that the proprietor has refused or failed to give any such acknowledgment.

(2) A declaration made by the Registrar under this section shall have the same effect as a declaration made by the court. [UK Patents 1977, s. 71]

PART XIV

REVOCATION OF PATENTS AND VALIDITY PROCEEDINGS

79. [Repealed by Act 19/2004]

Power to revoke patents on application

80.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Registrar may, on the application of any person, by order revoke a patent for an invention on (but only on) any of the following grounds:

(a) the invention is not a patentable invention;

(b) the patent was granted to a person who was not entitled to be granted that patent;

(c) the specification of the patent does not disclose the invention clearly and completely for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art;

(d) the matter disclosed in the specification of the patent extends beyond that disclosed —

(i) in the application for the patent, as filed; or

(ii) where the patent was granted on a new application filed under section 20(3) or 47(4) or section 116(6) of the Patents Act (Cap. 221, 1995 Ed.), or in accordance with section 26(11), in —

(A) the earlier application made under this Act;

(B) the application made under the United Kingdom Patents Act 1977; or

Patents101 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(C) the application under the European Patent Convention designating the United Kingdom filed at the European Patent Office,

as the case may be, from which the filing date and the right of priority has been derived, as filed;

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(e) an amendment or a correction has been made to the specification of —

(i) the patent; or

(ii) the application for the patent,

which should not have been allowed;

(f) the patent was obtained —

(i) fraudulently;

(ii) on any misrepresentation; or

(iii) on any non-disclosure or inaccurate disclosure of any prescribed material information, whether or not the person under a duty to provide the information knew or ought reasonably to have known of such information or the inaccuracy;

(g) the patent is one of 2 or more patents for the same invention having the same priority date and filed by the same party or his successor in title.

[19/2004]

(2) On the application of any person for an order to revoke a patent on any of the grounds specified in subsection (1)(a), (c), (d) and (e), the Registrar may, subject to subsection (3), cause the patent to be re- examined by an Examiner so as to determine whether the patent should be revoked on any of those grounds and require the applicant to pay the prescribed re-examination fee.

(3) The Registrar shall not cause a patent to be re-examined under subsection (2) where, within the prescribed period, the applicant for the revocation of the patent fails to give such security for the costs or expenses of the proceedings as the Registrar may specify; in which

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 102

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

case, the application for revocation shall be treated as having been abandoned.

(4) An application for the revocation of a patent on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(b) —

(a) may only be made by a person found by the court in an action for a declaration or found by the court or the Registrar on a reference under section 47, to be entitled to be granted that patent or to be granted a patent for part of the matter comprised in the specification of the patent sought to be revoked; and

(b) may not be made if that action was commenced or that reference was made after the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the grant of the patent sought to be revoked, unless it is shown that any person registered as a proprietor of the patent knew at the time of the grant or of the transfer of the patent to him that he was not entitled to the patent.

(5) An order under this section may be —

(a) an order for the unconditional revocation of the patent; or

(b) where one of the grounds mentioned in subsection (1) has been established, but only so as to invalidate the patent to a limited extent, an order that the patent should be revoked unless within a specified time the specification is amended under section 83 to the satisfaction of the Registrar.

(6) A decision of the Registrar or on appeal from the Registrar shall not estop any party to any civil proceedings in which infringement of a patent is in issue from alleging invalidity of the patent on any of the grounds referred to in subsection (1), whether or not any of the issues involved were decided in the decision.

(7) An order under this section revoking a patent shall have effect from the date of the grant of the patent.

(8) Where an applicant for the revocation of a patent discontinues or withdraws his application, he shall pay such costs or expenses of the proceedings as the Registrar may determine.

Patents103 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(9) An application for an order to revoke a patent shall be —

(a) made in the prescribed form and filed at the Registry in the prescribed manner; and

(b) accompanied by the prescribed fee.

(10) Section 92 shall not apply in relation to the decision of the Registrar to cause a patent to be re-examined under this section. [UK Patents 1977, s. 72]

Registrar’s power to revoke patents

81. If it appears to the Registrar that an invention for which a patent has been granted formed part of the state of the art by virtue only of section 14(3), he may on his own initiative by order revoke the patent, but shall not do so without giving the proprietor of the patent an opportunity of making any observation and of amending the specification of the patent so as to exclude any matter which formed part of the state of the art as aforesaid without contravening section 84. [UK Patents 1977, s. 73]

Proceedings in which validity of patent may be put in issue

82.—(1) Subject to this section, the validity of a patent may be put in issue —

(a) by way of defence, in proceedings for infringement of the patent under section 67 or proceedings under section 76 for infringement of rights conferred by the publication of an application;

(b) in proceedings under section 77;

(d) in proceedings before the Registrar under section 80 for the revocation of the patent; or

(e) in proceedings under section 56 or 58.

(2) The validity of a patent may not be put in issue in any other proceedings and, in particular, no proceedings may be instituted

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 104

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(whether under this Act or otherwise) seeking only a declaration as to the validity or invalidity of a patent.

(3) The only grounds on which the validity of a patent may be put in issue (whether in proceedings for revocation under section 80 or otherwise) are the grounds on which the patent may be revoked under that section.

(4) No determination shall be made in any proceedings mentioned in subsection (1) on the validity of a patent which any person puts in issue on the ground mentioned in section 80(1)(b) unless —

(a) it has been determined in entitlement proceedings commenced by that person or in the proceedings in which the validity of the patent is in issue that the patent should have been granted to him and not some other person; and

(b) except where it has been so determined in entitlement proceedings, the proceedings in which the validity of the patent is in issue are commenced before the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the grant of the patent or it is shown that any person registered as a proprietor of the patent knew at the time of the grant or of the transfer of the patent to him that he was not entitled to the patent.

(5) Where the validity of a patent is put in issue by way of defence or counterclaim, the court or the Registrar shall, if it or he thinks it just to do so, give the defendant an opportunity to comply with the condition in subsection (4)(a).

(6) In subsection (4), “entitlement proceedings”, in relation to a patent, means a reference under section 47(1) on the ground that the patent was granted to a person not entitled to it or proceedings for a declaration that it was so granted.

(7) Where proceedings with respect to a patent are pending in the court under any provision of this Act mentioned in subsection (1), no proceedings may be instituted without the leave of the court before the Registrar with respect to that patent under section 67(3), 76, 78 or 80.

Patents105 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(8) It is hereby declared that for the purposes of this Act the validity of a patent is not put in issue merely because the Registrar is considering its validity in order to decide whether to revoke it under section 81. [UK Patents 1977, s. 74]

PART XV

AMENDMENTS OF PATENTS AND APPLICATIONS

Amendment of patent in infringement or revocation proceedings

83.—(1) In any proceedings before the court or the Registrar in which the validity of a patent is put in issue, the court or, as the case may be, the Registrar may, subject to section 84, allow the proprietor of the patent to amend the specification of the patent in such manner, and subject to such terms as to the publication and advertisement of the proposed amendment and as to costs, expenses or otherwise, as the court or Registrar thinks fit.

(2) A person may give notice to the court or the Registrar of his opposition to an amendment proposed by the proprietor of the patent under this section, and if he does so the court or the Registrar shall notify the proprietor and consider the opposition in deciding whether the amendment or any amendment should be allowed.

(3) An amendment of a specification of a patent under this section shall have effect and be deemed always to have had effect from the grant of the patent.

(4) Where an application for an order under this section is made to the court, the applicant shall notify the Registrar, who shall be entitled to appear and be heard and shall appear if so directed by the court. [UK Patents 1977, s. 75]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 106

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Amendments of applications and patents not to include added matter

84.—(1) An application for a patent which —

(a) is made in respect of matter disclosed in an earlier application, or in the specification of a patent which has been granted; and

(b) discloses additional matter, that is, matter extending beyond that disclosed in the earlier application made under this Act or in the application made under the United Kingdom Patents Act 1977 or the application under the European Patent Convention designating the United Kingdom filed at the European Patent Office from which the filing date and right of priority is sought to be derived, as filed, or the application for the patent, as filed,

may be filed under section 20(3) or 47(4) or section 116(6) of the Patents Act (Cap. 221, 1995 Ed.), or as mentioned in section 26(11), but shall not be allowed to proceed unless it is amended so as to exclude the additional matter.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(1A) Where, in relation to an application for a patent —

(a) the documents filed at the Registry to initiate the application contain —

(i) a reference to an earlier relevant application specified in a declaration under section 17(2) made in or in connection with the application; and

(ii) a statement referred to in section 26(1)(c)(ii)(C); and

(b) the description filed under section 26(7)(b) discloses additional matter, that is, matter extending beyond that disclosed in the earlier relevant application,

the application shall not be allowed to proceed unless it is amended to exclude the additional matter.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

Patents107 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) No amendment of an application for a patent shall be allowed under section 31 if it results in the application disclosing any matter extending beyond that disclosed in the application as filed.

(3) No amendment of the specification of a patent shall be allowed under section 38(1), 81 or 83 if it —

(a) results in the specification disclosing any additional matter; or

(b) extends the protection conferred by the patent.

(4) In subsection (1A), “relevant application” has the same meaning as in section 17(5). [UK Patents 1977, s. 76]

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

PART XVI

INTERNATIONAL APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS

Effect of filing international application for patent

85.—(1) An international application for a patent (Singapore) for which a date of filing has been accorded under the Patent Co- operation Treaty shall, subject to sections 86 and 87, be treated for the purposes of this Act as an application for a patent under this Act.

(2) If the application, or the designation of Singapore in it, is withdrawn or (except as mentioned in subsection (3)) deemed to be withdrawn under the Patent Co-operation Treaty, it shall be treated as withdrawn under this Act.

(3) An application shall not be treated as withdrawn under this Act if it, or the designation of Singapore in it, is deemed to be withdrawn under the Patent Co-operation Treaty —

(a) because of an error or omission in an institution having functions under the Treaty; or

(b) because, owing to circumstances outside the applicant’s control, a copy of the application was not received by the International Bureau before the end of the time limited for that purpose under the Treaty; or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 108

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(4) If an international application for a patent which designates Singapore is refused a filing date under the Patent Co-operation Treaty and the Registrar determines that the refusal was caused by an error or omission in an institution having functions under that Treaty, he may direct that the application shall be treated as an application under this Act, having such date of filing as he may direct.

(5) The Registry shall act as a receiving Office under Article 2 of the Patent Co-operation Treaty in respect of international applications filed by citizens of Singapore or persons resident in Singapore.

(6) The prescribed transmittal fee, in addition to the fees prescribed by the Patent Co-operation Treaty, shall be paid to the Registry by any person filing an international application under that Treaty. [UK Patents 1977, s. 89]

International and national phases of application

86.—(1) The provisions of the Patent Co-operation Treaty relating to publication, search, examination and amendment, and not those of this Act, shall apply to an international application for a patent (Singapore) during the international phase of the application.

(2) The international phase of the application means the period from the filing of the application in accordance with the Patent Co- operation Treaty until the national phase of the application begins.

(3) The national phase of the application begins —

(a) when the prescribed period expires, provided —

(i) where the application has been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty in a language other than English, and the application is not in English, an English translation of the application has been filed at the Registry; and

(ii) the prescribed fee has been paid,

by the applicant; or

(b) when the applicant expressly requests the Registrar to proceed earlier with the national phase of the application,

Patents109 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

pays the prescribed fee and complies with any of the following sub‑paragraphs which is applicable:

(i) where, at the time of the request, the application has not been published in accordance with the Patent Co- operation Treaty, file at the Registry —

(A) a copy of the application; and

(B) if the copy is not in English, an English translation of the application;

(ii) where, at the time of the request, the application has been published in accordance with the Patent Co- operation Treaty in a language other than English, and the application is not in English, file at the Registry an English translation of the application.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(4) [Deleted by Act 2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(5) If the prescribed period expires without the conditions mentioned in subsection (3)(a) being satisfied, the application shall be taken to be withdrawn.

(6) Where, during the international phase, the application is amended in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty, the amendment shall be treated as made under this Act if, and shall be disregarded unless —

(a) when the prescribed period expires, where —

(i) the amendment is not in English; and

(ii) if any copy of the amendment has been communicated to the Registry in accordance with the Treaty, that copy is in a language other than English,

an English translation of the amendment has been filed at the Registry; or

(b) where the applicant expressly requests the Registrar to proceed earlier with the national phase of the application, there is then filed at the Registry —

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 110

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(i) a copy of the amendment, if none has been communicated to the Registry in accordance with the Treaty; and

(ii) an English translation of the amendment, if —

(A) the amendment is not in English; and

(B) where any copy of the amendment has been communicated to the Registry in accordance with the Treaty, that copy is in a language other than English.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(7) The Registrar shall on payment of the prescribed fee publish any translation filed at the Registry under subsection (3) or (6). [UK Patents 1977, s. 89A]

Adaptation of provisions in relation to international application

87.—(1) Where an international application for a patent (Singapore) is accorded a filing date under the Patent Co-operation Treaty —

(a) that date or, if the application is re-dated under the Treaty to a later date, that later date shall be treated as the date of filing the application under this Act;

(b) any declaration of priority made under the Treaty shall be treated as made under section 17(2), and where in accordance with the Treaty any extra days are allowed, the period of 12 months referred to in section 17(2A)(a) shall be treated as altered accordingly; and

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(c) any statement of the name of the inventor under the Treaty shall be treated as a statement filed under section 24(2).

(2) If the application, not having been published under this Act, is published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty, it shall be treated, for purposes other than those mentioned in subsection (3), as published under section 27 when the national phase of the application begins or, if later, when published in accordance with the Treaty.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

Patents111 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) For the purposes of sections 56 and 76, the application, not having been published under this Act, shall be treated as published under section 27 —

(a) if it is published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty in English, on its being so published; and

(b) if it is so published in a language other than English —

(i) on the publication of an English translation of the application in accordance with section 86(7); or

(ii) on the service by the applicant of an English translation of the specification of the application on the Government department concerned or, as the case may be, on the person committing the infringing act.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

[19/2004]

(4) The reference in subsection (3)(b)(ii) to the service of an English translation on a Government department or other person is to its being sent by post or delivered to that department or person.

(5) During the international phase of the application, section 20 does not apply (determination of questions of entitlement in relation to application under this Act); but after the end of the international phase section 20 shall apply. [UK Patents 1977, s. 89B]

Evidence of Patent Co-operation Treaty and its instruments

88.—(1) Judicial notice shall be taken of the Patent Co-operation Treaty and anyGazette, bulletin or journal published under the Treaty.

(2) Any such document mentioned in subsection (1) shall be admissible as evidence of any instrument or other act thereby communicated of any institution having functions under the Treaty.

(3) Evidence of any instrument issued under the Patent Co- operation Treaty by any institution or of any document in the custody of any institution or reproducing in legible form any information in such custody otherwise than in legible form, or any entry or extract from such a document, may be given in any legal

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 112

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

proceedings by production of a copy certified as a true copy by an official of that institution.

(4) Any document purporting to be such a copy as is specified by subsection (3) shall be received in evidence without proof of the official position or handwriting of the person signing the certificate.

(5) Evidence of any instrument mentioned in subsection (3) may also be given in any legal proceedings —

(a) by production of a copy purporting to be printed by the Government Printers; or

(b) where the instrument is in the custody of a Government department, by production of a copy certified on behalf of the department to be a true copy by an officer of the department generally or specially authorised to do so.

(6) Any document purporting to be such a copy as is mentioned in subsection (5)(b) of an instrument in the custody of a Government department shall be received in evidence without proof of the official position or handwriting of the person signing the certificate, or of his authority to do so, or of the document being in the custody of the department.

(7) In this section, “legal proceedings” includes proceedings before the Registrar. [UK Patents 1977, s. 91]

PART XVII

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Proceedings before court or Registrar

89.—(1) Any proceedings before the court relating to patents and other matters under this Act shall be dealt with by a judge sitting alone or, if he thinks fit, with one or more scientific advisers selected by the judge from the panel appointed under subsection (2).

(2) Rules under this Act may make provision for the appointment of a panel of scientific advisers to assist the court and the Registrar in

Patents113 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

proceedings under this Act, for regulating the functions of such advisers and for remunerating such advisers.

Appeals from Registrar

90.—(1) An appeal shall lie to the court from any decision of the Registrar under this Act or the rules except any of the following decisions:

(a) a decision falling within section 25(7);

(b) a decision under section 27(3) to omit any matter from a specification;

(d) a decision under the rules which is excepted by the rules from the right of appeal conferred by this section.

(2) For the purpose of hearing appeals under this section, the court may consist of one or more judges of the court in accordance with directions given by or on behalf of the Chief Justice.

(3) An appeal shall not lie to the Court of Appeal from a decision of the court on appeal from a decision of the Registrar under this Act or the rules —

(a) except where the decision of the Registrar was given under section 20, 38, 47, 67, 80, 81 or 83; or

(b) except where the ground of appeal is that the decision of the court is wrong in law,

but an appeal shall only lie to the Court of Appeal under this section if leave to appeal is given by the court or the Court of Appeal. [UK Patents 1977, s. 97]

General powers of court

91.—(1) The court may, for the purpose of determining any question in the exercise of its original or appellate jurisdiction under this Act, make any order or exercise any other power which the Registrar could have made or exercised for the purpose of determining that question.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 114

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) In all proceedings before the court under this Act, the costs of the Registrar shall be in the discretion of the court, but the Registrar shall not be ordered to pay the costs of any other of the parties. [UK Patents 1977, s. 99]

Exercise of Registrar’s discretionary powers

92. Without prejudice to any rule of law, the Registrar shall give any party to a proceeding before him an opportunity of being heard before exercising adversely to that party any discretion vested in the Registrar by this Act or the rules. [UK Patents 1977, s. 101]

Right of audience in patent proceedings

93.—(1) Any party to any proceedings before the Registrar under this Act or any treaty to which Singapore is a party may appear before the Registrar in person or be represented by an advocate and solicitor or a registered patent agent.

[30/2001]

(2) The Government may be represented by a Legal Service Officer in any proceedings before the Registrar under this Act or any treaty to which Singapore is a party.

[20/2009 wef 09/10/2009]

[30/2001]

(3) Without prejudice to the right of counsel to appear before the court, an advocate and solicitor who is not in actual practice shall, notwithstanding anything in the Legal Profession Act (Cap. 161), have the right to appear and be heard on behalf of any party to an appeal under this Act from the Registrar to the court. [UK Patents 1977, s. 102]

[30/2001]

Extension of privilege for communications with solicitors relating to patent proceedings

94.—(1) It is hereby declared that the rule of law which confers privilege from disclosure in legal proceedings in respect of communications made with an advocate and solicitor or a person acting on his behalf, or in relation to information obtained or supplied

Patents115 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

for submission to an advocate and solicitor or a person acting on his behalf, for the purpose of any pending or contemplated proceedings before a court in Singapore extends to such communications so made for the purpose of any pending or contemplated proceedings before the Registrar under this Act.

(2) In this section, “legal proceedings” includes proceedings before the Registrar; and references to “legal proceedings” and “pending or contemplated proceedings” include references to applications for a patent and to international applications for a patent. [UK Patents 1977, s. 103]

Privilege for communications with patent agents, etc.

95.—(1) A communication with respect to any matter relating to patents —

(a) between a person and any of the following:

(i) a registered patent agent or a registered foreign patent agent;

(ii) a partnership entitled under Part XIX to describe itself as a firm of patent agents or as a firm of foreign patent agents; or

(iii) a body corporate entitled under Part XIX to describe itself as a patent agent or as a foreign patent agent; or

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) for the purpose of obtaining, or in response to a request for, information which a person is seeking for the purpose of instructing his patent agent or a registered foreign patent agent,

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

is privileged from disclosure in legal proceedings in Singapore in the same way as a communication between a person and his solicitor or, as the case may be, a communication for the purpose of obtaining, or in response to a request for, information which a person seeks for the purpose of instructing his solicitor.

(2) In this section —

“legal proceedings” includes proceedings before the Registrar;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 116

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

“patent” includes any patent or other protection for an invention granted in any country or jurisdiction other than Singapore.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Costs and expenses in proceedings before Registrar

96.—(1) The Registrar may, in proceedings before him under this Act, by order award to any party such costs as he may consider reasonable and direct how and by what parties they are to be paid.

(2) Any costs awarded under this section shall, if a District Court or a Magistrate’s Court so orders, be recoverable by execution issued from that Court or otherwise as if they were payable under an order of that Court.

(3) If any person by whom —

(a) a reference is made to the Registrar under section 20 or 47;

(b) an application is made to the Registrar for the revocation of a patent; or

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

neither resides nor carries on business in Singapore, the Registrar may require him to give security for the costs or expenses of the proceedings and in default of such security being given may treat the reference, application or notice as abandoned. [UK Patents 1977, s. 107]

[40/95]

Licences granted by order of Registrar

97. Any order by the Registrar for the grant of a licence under this Act shall, without prejudice to any other method of enforcement, have effect as if it were a deed, executed by the proprietor of the patent and all other necessary parties, granting a licence in accordance with the order. [UK Patents 1977, s. 108]

Patents117 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

PART XVIII

OFFENCES

Falsification of register, etc.

98. If a person makes or causes to be made a false entry in any register kept under this Act, or a writing falsely purporting to be a copy or reproduction of an entry in any such register, or produces or tenders or causes to be produced or tendered in evidence any such writing, knowing the entry or writing to be false, he shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both. [UK Patents 1977, s. 109]

Unauthorised claim of patent rights

99.—(1) If a person falsely represents that anything disposed of by him for value is a patented product, he shall, subject to this section, be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a person who for value disposes of an article having stamped, engraved or impressed on it or otherwise applied to it the word “patent” or “patented” or anything expressing or implying that the article is a patented product, shall be taken to represent that the article is a patented product.

(3) Subsection (1) shall not apply where the representation is made in respect of a product after the patent for that product or, as the case may be, the process in question has expired or been revoked and before the end of a period which is reasonably sufficient to enable the accused to take steps to ensure that the representation is not made or does not continue to be made.

(4) In proceedings for an offence under this section, it shall be a defence for the accused to prove that he used due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence. [UK Patents 1977, s. 110]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 118

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Unauthorised claim that patent has been applied for

100.—(1) If a person represents that a patent has been applied for in respect of any article disposed of for value by him and —

(a) no such application has been made; or

(b) any such application has been refused, withdrawn or treated as having been abandoned,

he shall, subject to this section, be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

(2) Subsection (1)(b) shall not apply where the representation is made or continues to be made before the expiry of a period which commences with the refusal, withdrawal or abandonment and which is reasonably sufficient to enable the accused to take steps to ensure that the representation is not made or does not continue to be made.

(3) For the purpose of subsection (1), a person who for value disposes of an article having stamped, engraved or impressed on it or otherwise applied to it the words “patent applied for” or “patent pending”, or anything expressing or implying that a patent has been applied for in respect of the article, shall be taken to represent that a patent has been applied for in respect of it.

(4) In any proceedings for an offence under this section, it shall be a defence for the accused to prove that he used due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence. [UK Patents 1977, s. 111]

Misuse of title “Registry of Patents”

101. If any person uses on his place of business, or on any document issued by him, or otherwise, the words “Registry of Patents” or any other words suggesting that his place of business is, or is officially connected with, the Registry of Patents, he shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both. [UK Patents 1977, s. 112]

Patents119 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Offences by corporations and partnerships

102.—(1) Where an offence under this Act which has been committed by a body corporate is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, a director, manager, secretary or any similar officer of the body corporate, or any person who was purporting to act in any such capacity, he, as well as the body corporate, shall be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

(2) Where the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, subsection (1) shall apply in relation to the acts and defaults of a member in connection with his functions of management as if he were a director of the body corporate.

(3) Proceedings for an offence under this Act alleged to have been committed by a partnership shall be brought in the name of the partnership and not in that of the partners; but without prejudice to any liability of the partners under subsection (5).

(4) A fine imposed on a partnership on its conviction in such proceedings shall be paid out of the partnership assets.

(5) Where a partnership is guilty of an offence under this Act, every partner, other than a partner who is proved to have been ignorant of or to have attempted to prevent the commission of the offence, is also guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. [UK Patents 1977, ss. 113 and 285]

Composition of offences

103.—(1) The Registrar or any person authorised by him in writing may, in his discretion, compound any offence under this Act which is prescribed as a compoundable offence by collecting from a person reasonably suspected of having committed the offence a sum of money not exceeding $2,000.

[3/2001]

(2) The Office may, with the approval of the Minister, make regulations to prescribe the offences which may be compounded.

[3/2001]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 120

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(3) On payment of such sum of money, no further proceedings shall be taken against such person in respect of the offence.

[3/2001]

(4) All sums collected under this section shall be paid into the funds of the Office.

[3/2001]

PART XIX

PATENT AGENTS AND FOREIGN PATENT AGENTS [Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Registration of patent agents and foreign patent agents

104.—(1) The Minister may make rules for the registration of individuals as patent agents or as foreign patent agents.

[30/2001]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the rules may provide —

(a) for the keeping, by such person as the Minister may determine, of a register of patent agents and a register of foreign patent agents;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) for the form and manner of application for registration as a patent agent or as a foreign patent agent, the qualifications and other requirements for registration, the fees payable for registration, and the conditions of registration;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(d) for the correction of errors and updating of entries in the register of patent agents and the register of foreign patent agents; and

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(e) for transitional matters in relation to the registration of individuals as patent agents or as foreign patent agents, and

Patents121 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

exclude or vary the operation of this Act in relation to such transitional matters.

[30/2001]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(3) The rules may make provision to regulate the professional conduct of registered patent agents, registered foreign patent agents and the practices of registered patent agents and registered foreign patent agents and, for that purpose, may make provision for and in relation to all or any of the following:

(a) making complaints against registered patent agents and registered foreign patent agents and hearing and deciding upon such complaints;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) imposing penalties on registered patent agents and registered foreign patent agents, including issuing a reprimand, and suspending or cancelling registration;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(d) receiving evidence from persons on oath or affirmation;

(e) administering oaths or affirmations to persons giving evidence;

(f) requiring persons to produce documents or articles;

(g) restoring any registration that has been cancelled and lifting the suspension imposed on any registration.

[30/2001]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(4) The rules may provide that a contravention of the rules shall be an offence and may provide penalties not exceeding a fine of $5,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both. [UK Patents 1977, s. 275]

[30/2001]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 122

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Persons entitled to act as patent agents, etc.

105.—(1) An individual shall not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent unless he is a registered patent agent, or an advocate and solicitor, who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(2) A partnership shall not carry on a business, practise or act as patent agents unless at least one partner is a registered patent agent, or an advocate and solicitor, who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(3) A body corporate shall not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent unless at least one director is a registered patent agent, or an advocate and solicitor, who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(4) For the purposes of this section and section 105A, a person is taken to carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent if, and only if, the person does, or undertakes to do, on behalf of someone else, any of the following in Singapore for gain:

(a) applying for or obtaining patents at the Registry or any other place;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) preparing specifications or other documents for the purposes of this Act or the patent law of another country; or

(c) giving advice (other than advice of a scientific or technical nature) about the validity, or infringement, of patents.

[30/2001]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(5) An individual shall not —

(a) carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “patent agent” or “patent attorney”; or

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) in the course of a business otherwise describe himself, hold himself out or permit himself to be described or held out as a “patent agent” or “patent attorney”,

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Patents123 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

unless he is a registered patent agent who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(6) A partnership shall not —

(a) carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “patent agent” or “patent attorney”; or

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) in the course of a business otherwise describe itself, hold itself out or permit itself to be described or held out as a firm of “patent agents” or “patent attorneys”,

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

unless at least one partner is a registered patent agent who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(7) A body corporate shall not —

(a) carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “patent agent” or “patent attorney”; or

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(b) in the course of a business otherwise describe itself, hold itself out or permit itself to be described or held out as a “patent agent” or “patent attorney”,

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

unless at least one director is a registered patent agent who has in force a practising certificate.

[30/2001]

(8) Any person who contravenes this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

[30/2001]

(9) Where subsection (5), (6) or (7) would be contravened by the use of the words “patent agent” or “patent attorney” in reference to an individual, a partnership or a body corporate, it is equally contravened by the use of any other expression in reference to that person, or that person’s business or place of business, which is likely to be

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 124

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

understood as indicating that that person is entitled to be described as a “patent agent” or “patent attorney”.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(10) Where an individual’s employer does not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent or as a foreign patent agent, the individual does not contravene subsection (1) in respect of anything done, or undertaken to be done, by the individual for his employer in his capacity as employee of his employer.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(10A) Where —

(a) an individual’s employer is a member of a related company group;

(b) the individual’s employer does not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent or as a foreign patent agent; and

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(c) every other member of the related company group does not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent or as a foreign patent agent,

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

the individual does not contravene subsection (1) in respect of anything done, or undertaken to be done, by the individual for that other member of the related company group in his capacity as employee of his employer.

[2/2007 wef 01/04/2007]

(11) A Legal Service Officer does not commit an offence against subsection (1) in respect of anything done, or undertaken to be done, by him on behalf of the Government.

[20/2009 wef 09/10/2009]

[30/2001]

(12) A body corporate that is a member of a related company group does not contravene subsection (3) in respect of anything done, or undertaken to be done, by the body corporate for another member of the group.

[30/2001]

Patents125 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(13) This section shall not be construed as prohibiting an advocate and solicitor from taking part in proceedings relating to patents and applications for patents and, in particular, shall not derogate from section 93 as it applies to advocates and solicitors.

[30/2001]

(14) No offence is committed under section 33 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap. 161) by any person by reason only of the preparation by him of a document (other than a deed) for use in proceedings before the Registrar in relation to any patent or application for a patent.

[30/2001]

(15) In this section —

“director”, in relation to a body corporate whose affairs are managed by its members, means any member of the body corporate;

“patent” includes any patent or other protection for an invention granted in any country or jurisdiction other than Singapore;

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

“practising certificate” means —

(a) in relation to a registered patent agent, a practising certificate issued to him under rules made under section 104; or

(b) in relation to an advocate and solicitor, a practising certificate issued to him under section 25 of the Legal Profession Act; and

“related company group” means a group of 2 or more corporations within the meaning of the Companies Act (Cap. 50) which are related to each other in accordance with section 6 of that Act.

[30/2001] [Aust. Patents 1990, s. 201]

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 126

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Foreign patent agents

105A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, an individual may carry on a business, practise or act as a foreign patent agent if, and only if, he is a registered foreign patent agent.

(2) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, a partnership may carry on a business, practise or act as foreign patent agents if, and only if, at least one partner thereof is a registered foreign patent agent.

(3) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, a body corporate may carry on a business, practise or act as a foreign patent agent if, and only if, at least one director thereof is a registered foreign patent agent.

(4) For the purposes of section 105 and this section, a person is taken to carry on a business, practise or act as a foreign patent agent if, and only if, the person does, or undertakes to do, on behalf of someone else, any of the following in Singapore for gain:

(a) applying for or obtaining patents at any place other than the Registry;

(b) preparing specifications or other documents for the purposes of —

(i) the patent law of any country other than Singapore; or

(ii) an international application for a patent which, on its date of filing, designates any country other than Singapore (whether or not it also designates Singapore); or

(c) giving advice (other than advice of a scientific or technical nature) about the validity, or infringement, of patents under the patent law of any country other than Singapore.

(5) Except as permitted under subsections (1) to (4), a registered foreign patent agent —

(a) shall not carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent; and

(b) shall not purport to carry on a business, practise or act as a patent agent.

Patents127 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(6) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, if an individual is a registered foreign patent agent, he —

(a) may carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”; and

(b) may in the course of a business otherwise describe himself, hold himself out or permit himself to be described or held out as a “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”.

(7) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, if at least one partner of a partnership is a registered foreign patent agent, the partnership—

(a) may carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”; and

(b) may in the course of a business otherwise describe itself, hold itself out or permit itself to be described or held out as a firm of “foreign patent agents” or “foreign patent attorneys”.

(8) Notwithstanding anything in section 105, if at least one director of a body corporate is a registered foreign patent agent, the body corporate —

(a) may carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”; and

(b) may in the course of a business otherwise describe itself, hold itself out or permit itself to be described or held out as a “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”.

(9) No person (other than an individual, a partnership and a body corporate referred to in subsections (6), (7) and (8), respectively) shall —

(a) carry on a business under any name or other description which contains the words “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”; or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 128

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) describe himself, hold himself out or permit himself to be described or held out as a “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”.

(10) Any person who contravenes subsection (5) or (9) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

(11) Where subsection (9) would be contravened by the use of the words “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney” in reference to an individual, a partnership or a body corporate, it is equally contravened by the use of any other expression in reference to that person, or that person’s business or place of business, which is likely to be understood as indicating that that person is entitled to be described as a “foreign patent agent” or “foreign patent attorney”.

(12) In this section —

“director”, in relation to a body corporate whose affairs are managed by its members, means any member of the body corporate;

“patent” includes any patent or other protection for an invention granted in any country or jurisdiction other than Singapore.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

PART XX

MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL

Immunity of Office, its officers and Examiners

106. The Office, any officer of the Registry and any Examiner shall not —

(a) be taken to warrant the validity of any patent granted under this Act or any treaty to which Singapore is a party;

(b) incur any liability by reason of or in connection with any examination or investigation required or authorised by this Act or any such treaty or any report or other proceedings consequent on any such examination or investigation; or

Patents129 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(c) incur any liability by reason of an incorrect entry in the register of patent agents or the register of foreign patent agents maintained under Part XIX.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

[3/2001] [UK Patents 1977, s. 116]

Correction of errors in patents and applications

107.—(1) The Registrar may, subject to any provision of the rules, correct any error of translation or transcription, clerical error or mistake in any specification of a patent or application for a patent or any document filed in connection with a patent or such an application.

(2) Where the Registrar is requested to correct such an error or mistake, any person may in accordance with the rules give the Registrar notice of opposition to the request and the Registrar shall determine the matter. [UK Patents 1977, s. 117]

Information about patent applications and patents, and inspection of documents

108.—(1) After publication of an application for a patent in accordance with section 27, the Registrar shall, on request being made to him in the prescribed manner and on payment of the prescribed fee (if any), give the person making the request such information, and permit him to inspect such documents, relating to the application or to any patent granted in pursuance of the application as may be specified in the request, subject, however, to any prescribed restriction.

(2) Subject to this section, until an application for a patent is so published, documents or information constituting or relating to the application shall not, without the consent of the applicant, be published or communicated to any person by the Registrar.

(3) Subsection (2) shall not prevent —

(a) the Registrar from publishing or communicating to others any bibliographic information about an unpublished application for a patent; or

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 130

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(b) the Minister from inspecting or authorising the inspection of an application for a patent or any connected document under section 33(5).

(4) Where a person is notified that an application for a patent has been made, but not published in accordance with section 27, and that the applicant will, if the patent is granted, bring proceedings against that person in the event of his doing an act specified in the notification after the application is so published, that person may make a request under subsection (1), notwithstanding that the application has not been published, and that subsection shall apply accordingly.

(5) Where an application for a patent is filed, but not published, and a new application is filed in respect of any part of the subject-matter of the earlier application (either in accordance with the rules or in pursuance of an order under section 20) and is published, any person may make a request under subsection (1) relating to the earlier application and on payment of the prescribed fee the Registrar shall give him such information and permit him to inspect such documents as could have been given or inspected if the earlier application had been published.

(6) The publication of the whole or part of a specification of a patent or an application for a patent shall not constitute an infringement of any copyright subsisting under the Copyright Act (Cap. 63) in any literary or artistic work. [UK Patents 1977, s. 118; Aust. Patents 1990, s. 226]

109. [Repealed by Act 16 of 2016 wef 10/06/2016]

Extension of time

110.—(1) The Minister may, after consulting with the Office, make rules to provide for the extension of any period of time specified for the doing of any act in relation to —

(a) any application for or grant of a patent;

(b) any proceedings before the Registrar under this Act or the rules; or

Patents131 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(2) The rules may contain such provision as the Minister thinks fit regulating the circumstances in which such an extension may be granted and may also provide for the protection and compensation of persons affected by the grant of extension of time and may authorise the Registrar to grant an extension of time notwithstanding that the period has already expired.

Hours of business and excluded days

111.—(1) The Registrar may issue practice directions to specify —

(a) the hours of business of the Registry; and

(b) the days which are to be treated as excluded days. [19/2004]

(2) The Minister may prescribe the effect of doing any business under this Act —

(a) on any day after the hours of business of the Registry; or

(b) on any day which is an excluded day. [19/2004]

(3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) —

(a) different hours of business may be specified for different classes of business;

(b) different excluded days may be specified for different classes of business; and

(i) outside the hours of business of the Registry; or

(ii) on an excluded day,

may be prescribed for different classes of business. [19/2004]

[UK Patents 1977, s. 120]

Government’s right to sell forfeited articles

112. Nothing in this Act shall affect the right of the Government or any person deriving title, directly or indirectly, from the Government

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 132

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

to dispose of or use articles forfeited under the laws relating to customs or excise. [UK Patents 1977, s. 122]

Extent of invention

113.—(1) For the purposes of this Act, an invention for a patent for which an application has been made or for which a patent has been granted shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be taken to be that specified in a claim of the specification of the application or patent, as the case may be, as interpretated by the description and any drawings contained in that specification, and the extent of the protection conferred by a patent or application for a patent shall be determined accordingly.

(2) It is hereby declared for the avoidance of doubt that where more than one invention is specified in any such claim, each invention may have a different priority date under section 17. [UK Patents 1977, s. 125]

Availability of samples of micro-organisms

114.—(1) Provision may be made by rules prescribing the circumstances in which the specification of an application for a patent, or of a patent, for an invention which requires for its performance the use of a micro-organism is to be treated as disclosing the invention in a manner which is clear enough and complete enough for the invention to be performed by a person skilled in the art.

(2) The rules may in particular require the applicant or patentee —

(a) to take such steps as may be prescribed for the purposes of making available to the public samples of the micro- organism; and

(b) not to impose or maintain restrictions on the uses to which such samples may be put, except as may be prescribed.

(3) The rules may provide that, in such cases as may be prescribed, samples need only be made available to such persons or descriptions of persons as may be prescribed.

Patents133 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(4) The rules may identify a description of persons by reference to whether the Registrar has given his certificate as to any matter.

(5) An application for revocation of the patent under section 80(1)(c) may be made if any of the requirements of the rules ceases to be complied with. [UK Patents 1977, s. 125A]

Rules

115.—(1) The Minister may, after consulting with the Office, make such rules as he thinks expedient for regulating the business of the Registry in relation to patents and applications for patents (including international applications for patents) and for regulating all matters placed by this Act under the direction or control of the Registrar.

[3/2001]

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the rules may make provision —

(a) prescribing the contents of applications for patents and other documents which may be filed at the Registry and requiring copies to be furnished of any such documents;

(b) regulating the procedure to be followed in connection with any proceeding or other matter before the Registrar or the Registry and authorising the rectification of irregularities of the procedure;

(c) requiring fees to be paid in connection with any such proceeding or matter or in connection with the provision of any service by the Registry and providing for the remission of fees in the prescribed circumstances;

(d) regulating the mode of giving evidence in any such proceeding and empowering the Registrar to compel the attendance of witnesses and the discovery of and production of documents;

(e) requiring the Registrar to publish any proposed amendment of patents and any other prescribed matters including any prescribed steps in any such proceeding;

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 134

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(f) providing for the appointment of scientific advisers to assist the court and the Registrar in any proceeding before it or him and for the remuneration of such advisers;

(g) prescribing time limits for doing anything required to be done in connection with any such proceeding by this Act or the rules;

(h) giving effect to the right of an inventor of an invention to be mentioned in an application for a patent for the invention;

(i) providing for the publication and sale of documents in the Registry and of information about such documents;

(j) prescribing, in relation to international applications, matters necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Patent Co-operation Treaty;

(k) excluding or varying the operation of the provisions of this Act in relation to international applications and applications for patents made under section 117;

(l) requiring and regulating the translation of documents in connection with any application for a patent and the filing and authentication of any such translations;

(m) prescribing the scale of costs for proceedings before the Registrar; and

(n) prescribing anything that is required or permitted to be prescribed under this Act.

[30/2001; 19/2004]

(3) The rules may make different provisions for different cases.

(4) The rules shall provide for the publication by the Registrar of a journal (referred to in this Act as the journal) containing particulars of applications for and grants of patents, particulars of application for and the registration of patent agents and foreign patent agents, and of other proceedings under this Act.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

(5) The rules may require or authorise the Registrar to make arrangements for the publication of reports of cases relating to patents

Patents135 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

decided by him or by any court or body whether in Singapore or elsewhere. [UK Patents 1977, s. 123]

Forms and directions of Registrar

115A. The Minister may make rules for the publication by the Registrar of —

(a) the forms to be used for any purpose relating to —

(i) any application for or grant of a patent;

(ii) any proceedings before the Registrar under this Act or the rules; or

(iii) any other matter under this Act or the rules; and

(b) the practice directions issued by the Registrar. [19/2004]

Fees

116.—(1) There shall be paid in respect of applications, grants, registrations and other matters under this Act such fees as may be prescribed.

(2) All fees collected shall be paid into the funds of the Office.

(3) Subsection (2) shall not apply to fees paid under section 85 which are to be forwarded to the International Bureau.

[Act 15 of 2012 wef 14/02/2014]

Amendment of Schedule

116A.—(1) The Minister may, by order published in the Gazette, amend the Schedule.

(2) The Minister may prescribe in an order amending the Schedule such transitional provisions as may be necessary or expedient.

[Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

Transitional provisions

117.—(1) Where an application has been made under section 3 of the repealed Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act (Cap. 271, 1985 Ed.) before 23rd February 1995, the Registrar may issue a

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 136

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

certificate of registration under section 5 of that Act after that date as if that Act had not been repealed.

(2) Where a patent has been granted under the United Kingdom Patents Act 1977 not earlier than 36 months before, or not later than 12 months after, 23rd February 1995, the proprietor of the patent may, within a period of 24 months from that date, make an application for a certificate of registration and the Registrar may issue a certificate on such application as if the Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act had not been repealed.

(3) Any certificate of registration issued under section 5 of the repealed Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act and is in force immediately before 23rd February 1995, or issued after that date by virtue of subsection (1) or (2) shall continue in force and the patent to which the certificate relates shall be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it were a patent under this Act granted in pursuance of an application made under this Act and the proprietor of the patent shall accordingly have the same rights, remedies, privileges and obligations and subject to the same conditions (including the payment of any fee prescribed under section 36), as the proprietor of a patent under this Act subject to the following modifications:

(a) the term of the patent shall date from the date of the patent in the United Kingdom and the patent shall subject to this Act remain in force for 20 years from that date and only so long as the patent has not been revoked in the United Kingdom before 17th October 2001;

(b) such other modifications as may be prescribed. [30/2001]

(4) A patent to which subsection (3) applies shall be treated for the purposes of sections 14(3) and 17(2) as being granted on an application with a date of filing under this Act and published under this Act.

(5) The date of filing an application for a patent as mentioned in subsection (4), and the priority date of an invention or other matter contained in that application, shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the United Kingdom Patents Act 1949 or 1977, as the case may be.

Patents137 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

(6) Where an act is commenced before 23rd February 1995 and continues to be done on or after that date, then, if it would not, under the law in force immediately before that date, amount to an infringement of a patent or the privileges or rights arising under a specification, its continuance on or after that date shall not amount to the infringement of that patent or those privileges or rights.

THE SCHEDULE

Section 2(1)

SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE NOT PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

1. In this Schedule, unless the context otherwise requires —

“Chinese proprietary medicine” means any medicinal product used in the system of therapeutics according to the traditional Chinese method, that is to say, any medicinal product —

(a) which has been manufactured into a finished product;

(b) which contains one or more active substances derived wholly from any plant, animal or mineral, or any combination thereof; and

(c) which is, or all of the active substances of which are, described in the current edition of “ADictionary of Chinese Pharmacy” << 中药大辞典>> or “The Chinese Herbal Medicine Materia Medica” <<本草纲目>>,

but does not include —

(i) any medicinal product to be administered by injection into a human body; or

(ii) any medicinal product which contains as an active substance any chemically-defined isolated constituent of any plant, animal or mineral, or any combination thereof;

“current edition”, in relation to any publication which describes a Chinese proprietary medicine, means an edition which is current at the time the Chinese proprietary medicine in question is sold or supplied, and includes any amendment, addition or deletion made to that edition of the publication up to that time;

“homoeopathic medicine” means any substance used in the system of therapeutics in which a disease is treated by the use of minute amounts of one or more substances which, in their undiluted forms, are capable of

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 138

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

THE SCHEDULE — continued

producing in a healthy human being symptoms similar to those of the disease being treated;

“medicated oil or balm” means any external medicated embrocation, medicated cream, ointment or inhalant —

(a) which is used mainly for soothing purposes; and

(b) which contains one or more of the following substances as an active ingredient or as active ingredients:

(i) any essential oil;

(ii) any fixed oil derived from a plant;

(iii) methyl salicylate;

(iv) menthol;

(v) camphor;

(vi) peppermint;

“quasi-medicinal product” means —

(a) any anti-dandruff preparation;

(b) any medicated cosmetic product for the treatment of pimples or acne, except any preparation containing etretinate or 13-cis- retinoic acid;

(d) any sweet for relieving coughs or throat irritations;

(e) any medicated plaster;

(f) any sunscreen or suntan preparation;

(g) any medicated beverage;

(h) any vitamin or nutritional preparation from any plant, animal or mineral, or any combination thereof; or

(i) any medicated toothpaste;

“traditional medicine” means any medicinal product consisting of one or more substances derived from any plant, animal or mineral, or any combination thereof, but does not include the following:

(a) any medicinal product to be administered by injection into a human body;

(b) any vaccine to be administered to a human being;

Patents139 CAP. 221 2005 Ed.

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

THE SCHEDULE — continued

(d) any item specified in the Poisons List in the Schedule to the Poisons Act (Cap. 234);

(e) any Chinese proprietary medicine. [Act 4 of 2014 wef 10/03/2014]

2. For the purposes of this Act, “pharmaceutical product” does not include —

(a) any traditional medicine;

(b) any homoeopathic medicine;

(d) any raw material which is used as an ingredient in the preparation or manufacture of any medicinal product; or

(e) any medicated oil or balm.

3. For the avoidance of doubt, for the purposes of this Act, “pharmaceutical product” does not include any substance —

(a) which is a type of food, a food additive or a food supplement; or

(b) which occurs naturally in any plant, animal or mineral.

Patents2005 Ed. CAP. 221 140

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

LEGISLATIVE SOURCE KEY

PATENTS ACT (CHAPTER 221)

Notes:—Unless otherwise stated, the abbreviations used in the references to other Acts and statutory provisions are references to the following Acts and statutory provisions. The references are provided for convenience and are not part of the Act:

UK Patents 1977 : UK Patents Act 1977 (c. 37)

Aust. Patents 1990 : Australian Patents Act 1990 (Act No. 83 of 1990)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

PATENTS ACT (CHAPTER 221)

This Legislative History is provided for the convenience of users of the Patents Act. It is not part of the Patents Act.

1. Act 21 of 1994 — Patents Act 1995

Date of First Reading : 23 February 1994 (Bill No. 4/94 published on 24 February 1994)

Date of Second Reading : 21 March 1994

Referred to Select Committee : 22 August 1994

Date of Third Reading : 31 October 1994

Date of commencement : 23 February 1995 (except Part XIX, section 105 (7))

2. 1995 Revised Edition — Patents Act

Date of operation : 15 March 1995

3. Act 40 of 1995 — Patents (Amendment) Act 1995

Date of First Reading : 27 September 1995 (Bill No. 31/95 published on 28 September 1995)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 1 November 1995

Date of commencement : 1 January 1996

4. Act 3 of 2001 — Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Act (Consequential amendments made by)

Date of First Reading : 12 January 2001 (Bill No. 1/2001 published on 13 January 2001)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 22 February 2001

Date of commencement : 1 April 2001

5. Act 30 of 2001 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2001

Date of First Reading : 25 July 2001 (Bill No. 28/2001 published on 26 July 2001)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Date of Second and Third Readings : 13 August 2001

Date of commencement : 17 October 2001 (except sections 6 and 14)

6. Act 30 of 2001 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2001

Date of First Reading : 25 July 2001 (Bill No. 28/2001 published on 26 July 2001)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 13 August 2001

Date of commencement : 2 February 2002 (section 14)

7. Act 30 of 2001 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2001

Date of First Reading : 25 July 2001 (Bill No. 28/2001 published on 26 July 2001)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 13 August 2001

Date of commencement : 25 February 2002 (section 6)

8. 2002 Revised Edition — Patents Act

Date of operation : 31 July 2002

9. G. N. No. S 622/2002 — Revised Edition of the Laws (Patents Act) (Rectification) Order 2002

Date of commencement : 31 July 2002

10. Act 19 of 2004 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2004

Date of First Reading : 19 May 2004 (Bill No. 19/2004 published on 20 May 2004)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 15 June 2004

Date of commencement : 1 July 2004

11. 2005 Revised Edition — Patents Act

Date of operation : 31 July 2005

12. Act 2 of 2007 — Statutes (Miscellaneous Amendment) Act 2007

Date of First Reading : 8 November 2006 (Bill No. 14/2006 published on 8 November 2006)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 22 January 2007

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Date of commencement : 1 April 2007

13. Act 18 of 2008 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2008

Date of First Reading : 21 July 2008 (Bill No. 15/2008 published on 21 July 2008)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 25 August 2008

Date of commencement : 1 December 2008

14. Act 20 of 2009 — Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2009

Date of First Reading : 20 July 2009 (Bill No. 13/2009 published on 20 July 2009)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 18 August 2009

Date of commencement : 9 October 2009

15. Act 15 of 2012 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2012

Date of First Reading : 14 May 2012 (Bill No. 13/2012 published on 14 May 2012)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 10 July 2012

Date of commencement : 8 April 2013

16. Act 15 of 2012 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2012

Date of First Reading : 14 May 2012 (Bill No. 13/2012 published on 14 May 2012)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 10 July 2012

Date of commencement : 14 February 2014

17. Act 4 of 2014 — Statutes (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2014

Date of First Reading : 11 November 2013 (Bill No. 25/2013 published on 11 November 2013)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 21 January 2014

Date of commencement : 10 March 2014

18. Act 4 of 2014 — Statutes (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2014

Date of First Reading : 11 November 2013 (Bill No. 25/2013 published on 11 November 2013)

iii

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Date of Second and Third Readings : 21 January 2014

Date of commencement : 30 April 2014

19. Act 16 of 2016 — Statutes (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2016

Date of First Reading : 14 April 2016 (Bill No. 15/2016 published on 14 April 2016)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 9 May 2016

Date of commencement : 10 June 2016

20. Act 15 of 2012 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2012

Date of First Reading : 14 May 2012 (Bill No. 13/2012 published on 14 May 2012)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 10 July 2012

Date of commencement : 1 November 2016

21. Act 18 of 2017 — Patents (Amendment) Act 2017

Date of First Reading : 6 February 2017 (Bill No. 6/2017 published on 6 February 2017)

Date of Second and Third Readings : 28 February 2017

Date of commencement : 30 October 2017

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

COMPARATIVE TABLE

PATENTS ACT (CHAPTER 221)

The following provisions in the 2002 Revised Edition of the Patents Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2005 Revised Edition.

This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Patents Act.

2005 Ed. 2002 Ed.

2—(1), (2) and (3) 2—(1), (2) and (3)

(4) (3A)

(5) (4)

(6) (5)

(7) (6)

(8) (7)

31—(1) 31—(1)

(2) (1A)

(3) (2)

55—(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) 55—(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6)

— (7) (Deleted by Act 19/2004)

— (8) (Deleted by Act 19/2004)

— (9) (Deleted by Act 19/2004)

(7) (10)

(8) (11)

— (12) (Deleted by Act 19/2004)

60—(1) and (2) 60—(1) and (2)

— (3) (Deleted by Act 19/2004)

66—(1) and (2) 66—(1) and (2)

(3) (2A)

(4) (2B)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

2005 Ed. 2002 Ed.

(5) (2C)

(6) (3)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

COMPARATIVE TABLE

PATENTS ACT (CHAPTER 221)

The following provisions in the 1995 Revised Edition of the Patents Act were renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in the 2002 Revised Edition.

This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Patents Act.

2002 Ed. 1995 Ed.

1 1—(1) and (2)

27—(1) and (2) 27—(1)

(3) (2)

28—(2) and (3) 28—(2)

29—(3) and (4) 29—(3)

(5) (4)

(6) (5)

(7) (6)

(8) and (9) (7)

(10) and (11) (8)

(12) (9)

35—(1) 35—(1) and (2)

(2) (3)

39—(2) and (3) 39—(2)

(4) (3)

(5) (4)

(6) (5)

(7) (6)

(8) (7)

(9) (8)

(10) and (11) (9)

(12) (10)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

2002 Ed. 1995 Ed.

(13) (11)

(14) (12)

42—(6) and (7) 42—(6)

(8) (7)

(9) (8)

48—(5) and (6) 48—(5)

Omitted 50—(1)

50—(1) (2)

(2) (3)

(3) (4)

(4) (5)

Omitted 52—(5)

52—(5) (6)

53—(5) and (6) 53—(5)

(7) (6)

54—(4) and (5) 54—(4)

(6) (5)

(7) and (8) (6)

Omitted 56

Omitted 57

Omitted 58

Omitted 59

Omitted 60

56 61

Omitted 62

57 63

Omitted 63—(3)

58 64

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

2002 Ed. 1995 Ed.

59 65

60 65A

61 65B

62 65C

63 Not in use

64 Not in use

65 Not in use

Omitted 67—(6)

69—(1) and (2) 69—(1)

(3) (2)

(4) (3)

71—(1) and (2) 71—(1)

(3) (2)

(4) (3)

76—(1) and (2) 76—(1)

(3) (2)

(4) (3)

88—(1) and (2) 88—(1)

(3) and (4) (2)

(5) and (6) (3)

(7) (4)

Omitted 89

89 90

90 91

91 92

92 93

93 94

94 95

iii

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

2002 Ed. 1995 Ed.

95 96

96 97

97 98

98 99

99 100

100 101

101 102

102 103

103 103A

114—(3) and (4) 114—(3)

(5) (4)

116 115A

117 116

Omitted 116—(6)

117—(6) (7)

Omitted (8)

Omitted (9)

Informal Consolidation – version in force from 30/10/2017

Loi sur les brevets (chapitre 221) (édition révisée 2005, telle que modifiée jusqu'à la loi de 2017 portant modification de la loi sur les brevets), Singapour

Documents disponibles