À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Ordonnance de 2000 sur les marques (enregistrement international) (modification)(S.I. 2000/138), Royaume-Uni

Retour
Version la plus récente dans WIPO Lex
Détails Détails Année de version 2000 Dates Entrée en vigueur: 17 février 2000 Adopté/e: 23 janvier 2000 Type de texte Textes règlementaires Sujet Marques

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000 ((S.I. 2000/138)        
 The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000

Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

2000 No. 138

TRADE MARKS

The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000

Made - - - - 23rd January 2000

Laid before Parliament 26th January 2000

Coming into force - - 17th February 2000

The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 54 of the Trade Marks Act 1994(1) (“the Act”), hereby makes the following Order:—

1. This Order may be cited as the Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000 and shall come into force on 17th February 2000.

2. The Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996(2) is amended as set out in articles 3 to 11.

3. In article 2, for the definition of “the Rules” substitute— ““the Rules” means the Trade Marks Rules 2000(3) and references to a rule shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed accordingly;”.

4. In article 6, for paragraph (6) substitute— “(6) “Prescribed particulars” means the particulars prescribed by rule 40.”.

5. In article 10— (a) for paragraph (4) substitute—

“(4) Subject to paragraphs (4A) and (4B) below, within three months of the date on which notice of refusal based on opposition is given to the International Bureau, the holder may file a counter-statement, in conjunction with notice of the same on Form TM8 and an address for service in the United Kingdom.

(4A) Subject to paragraph (4B), at any time before the expiry of the period prescribed by paragraph (4) above for filing of Form TM8 by the holder the registrar may, on request, grant an extension of three months to that period where such request is filed on Form TM9c and with the agreement of both the holder and the opposing

(1) 1994 c. 26. (2) S.I. 1996/714. (3) S.I. 2000/136.

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

party (the “cooling off period”); the registrar may, on request, extend the cooling off period for a further three months where such request is filed on Form TM9c and with the agreement of both the holder and the opposing party.

(4B) Within one month after the expiry of the cooling off period the holder may file a counter-statement, in conjunction with notice of the same on Form TM8 and an address for service in the United Kingdom.”;

(b) after paragraph (5) insert— “(5A) The provisions of rule 36 (case management) and rule 37 (pre-hearing review)

shall apply in relation to opposition proceedings.”.

6. In article 11,— (a) for paragraph (4)(b)(i) substitute—

“(i) the holder files a counter-statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B), or”;

(b) for paragraph (5)(b) substitute— “(b) after notice of refusal based on an opposition, the holder files a counter-

statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B),”.

7. In article 12, for paragraph (1)(a)(iii) substitute— “(iii) notice of refusal has been given in respect of some only of the goods or services in

respect of which protection in the United Kingdom has been requested and the registrar informs the International Bureau in accordance with article 11(4) that the holder has made no representations within the period specified in article 9(4) or has filed no counter- statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B) (as the case may be) or that the holder has informed the registrar that he does not intend to make such representations or file such a counter-statement, or”.

8. In article 13, for paragraph (4) substitute— “(4) The provisions of rules 31, 32 and 33, with necessary modifications, apply

respectively in relation to the procedure on application for revocation (on grounds of non- use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and declaration of invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK).

(4A) The provisions of rule 35 (intervention), rule 36 (case management) and rule 37 (pre-hearing review) apply in relation to a procedure on application for revocation (on grounds of non-use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and declaration of invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK).”.

9. In article 24, for paragraph (3) substitute— “(3) Rules 40 to 45 apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to the

supplementary register.”.

10. In article 25, for paragraph (5) substitute— “(5) Paragraphs (2) to (5) of rule 50, and rule 51, apply in relation to the right of

inspection conferred by paragraph (3) above.”.

11. For the heading to Article 32 substitute—

Application of Trade Mark Rules 2000”.

2

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

23rd January 2000

Sainsbury of Turville, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for

Science and Innovation, Department of Trade and Industry

3

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order amends the Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996 (S.I.1996/714) as a consequence of the replacement of the Trade Marks Rules 1994 (S.I. 1994/2583) by the Trade Mark Rules 2000 (S.I. 2000/136) (“the Rules”). The amendments of substance made by this Order are as follows:

(a) with the consent of both of the parties the registrar may grant a “cooling-off” period in actions for opposition to registration of an international trade mark (UK) under article 10(4)-(4B) (article 5);

(b) provision has been made for the registrar to call case management conferences and pre- hearing reviews in relation to procedures on opposition proceedings and application for revocation (on grounds of non-use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK) under article 13(4A) (articles 5 and 8);

Other changes relevant to the operation of the system provided for by the Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996 have been effected by the replacement of the Trade Marks Rules 1994 by the Trade Mark Rules 2000, in particular by virtue of the provisions of articles 3 and 11 of this Order, and article 32 of the 1996 Order. These include:

(1) certain time limits in actions for revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and invalidity have been reduced from three months to six weeks (rules 32 and 33 of the Rules);

(2) the time limit for appeal to the appointed person has been reduced from one month to 28 days (rule 63 of the Rules);

(3) provision has been made for “filing” of a document with the registrar to mean delivery of that document to the registrar at the Office (rule 2 of the Rules);

(4) where the Rules provide for the use of an affidavit or statutory declaration, a witness statement verified by a statement of truth may now be used as an alternative (rule 55 of the Rules);

(5) provision has been made for the calling and cross-examination of persons in proceedings where a party has adduced evidence of a statement made by a person otherwise than while giving oral evidence in those proceedings and does not call that person as a witness (rule 55 of the Rules).

4

Texte(s) supplémentaire(s) Page de couverture d’une notification de l’OMC (3 texte(s)) Page de couverture d’une notification de l’OMC (3 texte(s)) Anglais The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000 ((S.I. 2000/138) Français Ordonnance de 2000 sur les marques (enregistrement international) (modification)(S.I. 2000/138) Espagnol Orden de 2000 sobre Marcas de Fábrica o de Comercio (Registro Internacional) (Modificación) (S.I. 2000/138)
 The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000

Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

2000 No. 138

TRADE MARKS

The Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000

Made - - - - 23rd January 2000

Laid before Parliament 26th January 2000

Coming into force - - 17th February 2000

The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 54 of the Trade Marks Act 1994(1) (“the Act”), hereby makes the following Order:—

1. This Order may be cited as the Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Order 2000 and shall come into force on 17th February 2000.

2. The Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996(2) is amended as set out in articles 3 to 11.

3. In article 2, for the definition of “the Rules” substitute— ““the Rules” means the Trade Marks Rules 2000(3) and references to a rule shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed accordingly;”.

4. In article 6, for paragraph (6) substitute— “(6) “Prescribed particulars” means the particulars prescribed by rule 40.”.

5. In article 10— (a) for paragraph (4) substitute—

“(4) Subject to paragraphs (4A) and (4B) below, within three months of the date on which notice of refusal based on opposition is given to the International Bureau, the holder may file a counter-statement, in conjunction with notice of the same on Form TM8 and an address for service in the United Kingdom.

(4A) Subject to paragraph (4B), at any time before the expiry of the period prescribed by paragraph (4) above for filing of Form TM8 by the holder the registrar may, on request, grant an extension of three months to that period where such request is filed on Form TM9c and with the agreement of both the holder and the opposing

(1) 1994 c. 26. (2) S.I. 1996/714. (3) S.I. 2000/136.

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

party (the “cooling off period”); the registrar may, on request, extend the cooling off period for a further three months where such request is filed on Form TM9c and with the agreement of both the holder and the opposing party.

(4B) Within one month after the expiry of the cooling off period the holder may file a counter-statement, in conjunction with notice of the same on Form TM8 and an address for service in the United Kingdom.”;

(b) after paragraph (5) insert— “(5A) The provisions of rule 36 (case management) and rule 37 (pre-hearing review)

shall apply in relation to opposition proceedings.”.

6. In article 11,— (a) for paragraph (4)(b)(i) substitute—

“(i) the holder files a counter-statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B), or”;

(b) for paragraph (5)(b) substitute— “(b) after notice of refusal based on an opposition, the holder files a counter-

statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B),”.

7. In article 12, for paragraph (1)(a)(iii) substitute— “(iii) notice of refusal has been given in respect of some only of the goods or services in

respect of which protection in the United Kingdom has been requested and the registrar informs the International Bureau in accordance with article 11(4) that the holder has made no representations within the period specified in article 9(4) or has filed no counter- statement within the period specified in article 10(4) or 10(4B) (as the case may be) or that the holder has informed the registrar that he does not intend to make such representations or file such a counter-statement, or”.

8. In article 13, for paragraph (4) substitute— “(4) The provisions of rules 31, 32 and 33, with necessary modifications, apply

respectively in relation to the procedure on application for revocation (on grounds of non- use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and declaration of invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK).

(4A) The provisions of rule 35 (intervention), rule 36 (case management) and rule 37 (pre-hearing review) apply in relation to a procedure on application for revocation (on grounds of non-use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and declaration of invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK).”.

9. In article 24, for paragraph (3) substitute— “(3) Rules 40 to 45 apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to the

supplementary register.”.

10. In article 25, for paragraph (5) substitute— “(5) Paragraphs (2) to (5) of rule 50, and rule 51, apply in relation to the right of

inspection conferred by paragraph (3) above.”.

11. For the heading to Article 32 substitute—

Application of Trade Mark Rules 2000”.

2

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

23rd January 2000

Sainsbury of Turville, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for

Science and Innovation, Department of Trade and Industry

3

Document Generated: 2017-08-21 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order amends the Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996 (S.I.1996/714) as a consequence of the replacement of the Trade Marks Rules 1994 (S.I. 1994/2583) by the Trade Mark Rules 2000 (S.I. 2000/136) (“the Rules”). The amendments of substance made by this Order are as follows:

(a) with the consent of both of the parties the registrar may grant a “cooling-off” period in actions for opposition to registration of an international trade mark (UK) under article 10(4)-(4B) (article 5);

(b) provision has been made for the registrar to call case management conferences and pre- hearing reviews in relation to procedures on opposition proceedings and application for revocation (on grounds of non-use), revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and invalidity of protection of a protected international trade mark (UK) under article 13(4A) (articles 5 and 8);

Other changes relevant to the operation of the system provided for by the Trade Marks (International Registration) Order 1996 have been effected by the replacement of the Trade Marks Rules 1994 by the Trade Mark Rules 2000, in particular by virtue of the provisions of articles 3 and 11 of this Order, and article 32 of the 1996 Order. These include:

(1) certain time limits in actions for revocation (on grounds other than non-use) and invalidity have been reduced from three months to six weeks (rules 32 and 33 of the Rules);

(2) the time limit for appeal to the appointed person has been reduced from one month to 28 days (rule 63 of the Rules);

(3) provision has been made for “filing” of a document with the registrar to mean delivery of that document to the registrar at the Office (rule 2 of the Rules);

(4) where the Rules provide for the use of an affidavit or statutory declaration, a witness statement verified by a statement of truth may now be used as an alternative (rule 55 of the Rules);

(5) provision has been made for the calling and cross-examination of persons in proceedings where a party has adduced evidence of a statement made by a person otherwise than while giving oral evidence in those proceedings and does not call that person as a witness (rule 55 of the Rules).

4


Législation Modifie (1 texte(s)) Modifie (1 texte(s)) Met en application (1 texte(s)) Met en application (1 texte(s)) Référence du document de l'OMC
IP/N/1/GBR/9
IP/N/1/GBR/T/8
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex GB378