关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 金融 无形资产 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

版权法修正案(网络侵权)2015, 澳大利亚

返回
WIPO Lex中的最新版本
详情 详情 版本年份 2015 日期 议定: 2015年7月26日 生效: 2015年6月27日 文本类型 主要知识产权法 主题 版权与相关权利(邻接权), 知识产权及相关法律的执行 澳大利亚根据TRIPS第63条第2款发给世贸组织的通知中称:
“本法对版权法1968进行了修订,使得版权所有人可以向澳大利亚联邦法院(“联邦法院”)申请一项法院令要求网络传输服务提供者(CSP)屏蔽主要用于侵犯版权或为侵犯版权提供便利的网站。”
法案规定,版权所有人可以直接向联邦法院申请禁令以禁止对侵权的网站进行访问而无需先证明CSP有侵犯版权的责任或类似间接版权侵权行为。该等司法程序更加有效地防止对CSP施加不必要的责任。
禁令仅适用于在澳大利亚以外运营的网站。
法院对于颁发禁令需要考虑的因素有自由裁量权。
这些因素包括:
• 侵权行为的恶意或者帮助行为的恶意;
• 在该等情况下,禁止访问该等网站是否是恰当的处理方式;
•颁发禁令会对相关方可能造成的影响;以及
• 禁止访问该等网站是否符合公众利益。
上述在颁发一项禁止访问一个海外的侵权网络的禁令前所要考虑的因素从主观上提高了澳大利亚联邦法院的认定门槛。这些修改的目的是允许对为恶意侵犯版权的行为提供便利的网站采取特定和有针对性的救济。
禁令是一项无过错救济措施。其本意不在于影响现有法律对于侵权、版权的例外或限制、间接责任或安全港条件的规定。并且,法院颁发禁令并不意味着CSP构成直接和间接侵权行为。

可用资料

主要文本 相关文本
主要文本 主要文本 英语 Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015        
 
开 PDF open_in_new

Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015

No. 80, 2015

An Act to amend the Copyright Act 1968, and for related purposes

 

Contents

1 Short title

2 Commencement

3 Schedules

Schedule 1—Amendments

Copyright Act 1968

 

Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015

No. 80, 2015

 

An Act to amend the Copyright Act 1968, and for related purposes

[Assented to 26 June 2015]

The Parliament of Australia enacts:

1 Short title

This Act may be cited as the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015.

2 Commencement

This Act commences on the day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

3 Schedules

Legislation that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms.

Schedule 1—Amendments

Copyright Act 1968

1 After section 115

Insert:

115A Injunctions against carriage service providers providing access to online locations outside Australia

(1) The Federal Court of Australia may, on application by the owner of a copyright, grant an injunction referred to in subsection (2) if the Court is satisfied that:

(a) a carriage service provider provides access to an online location outside Australia; and

(b) the online location infringes, or facilitates an infringement of, the copyright; and

(c) the primary purpose of the online location is to infringe, or to facilitate the infringement of, copyright (whether or not in Australia).

(2) The injunction is to require the carriage service provider to take reasonable steps to disable access to the online location.

Parties

(3) The parties to an action under subsection (1) are:

(a) the owner of the copyright; and

(b) the carriage service provider; and

(c) the person who operates the online location if, but only if, that person makes an application to be joined as a party to the proceedings.

Service

(4) The owner of the copyright must notify:

(a) the carriage service provider; and

(b) the person who operates the online location;

of the making of an application under subsection (1), but the Court may dispense, on such terms as it sees fit, with the notice required to be sent under paragraph (b) if the Court is satisfied that the owner of the copyright is unable, despite reasonable efforts, to determine the identity or address of the person who operates the online location, or to send notices to that person.

Matters to be taken into account

(5) In determining whether to grant the injunction, the Court may take the following matters into account:

(a) the flagrancy of the infringement, or the flagrancy of the facilitation of the infringement, as referred to in paragraph (1)(c);

(b) whether the online location makes available or contains directories, indexes or categories of the means to infringe, or facilitate an infringement of, copyright;

(c) whether the owner or operator of the online location demonstrates a disregard for copyright generally;

(d) whether access to the online location has been disabled by orders from any court of another country or territory on the ground of or related to copyright infringement;

(e) whether disabling access to the online location is a proportionate response in the circumstances;

(f) the impact on any person, or class of persons, likely to be affected by the grant of the injunction;

(g) whether it is in the public interest to disable access to the online location;

(h) whether the owner of the copyright complied with subsection (4);

(i) any other remedies available under this Act;

(j) any other matter prescribed by the regulations;

(k) any other relevant matter.

Affidavit evidence

(6) For the purposes of the proceedings, section 134A (affidavit evidence) applies as if the reference in paragraph 134A(f) to a particular act included a reference to a class of acts.

Rescinding and varying injunctions

(7) The Court may:

(a) limit the duration of; or

(b) upon application, rescind or vary;

an injunction granted under this section.

(8) An application under subsection (7) may be made by:

(a) any of the persons referred to in subsection (3); or

(b) any other person prescribed by the regulations.

Costs

(9) The carriage service provider is not liable for any costs in relation to the proceedings unless the provider enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings.

2 Paragraphs 119(a) and 120(1)(b)

After “115”, insert “or 115A”.

3 Section 131A

Before “The”, insert “(1)”.

4 At the end of section 131A

Add:

(2) Despite subsection 39(2) of the Judiciary Act 1903, the Supreme Court of a State or Territory does not have jurisdiction in relation to applications under section 115A of this Act (injunctions against carriage service providers providing access to online locations outside Australia).

5 At the end of section 131D

Add “(other than section 115A)”.

 

[Minister’s second reading speech made in—

House of Representatives on 26 March 2015

Senate on 18 June 2015]

(56/15)


立法 修正 (1 文本) 修正 (1 文本) 世贸组织文件号
IP/N/1/AUS/7
IP/N/1/AUS/C/16
无可用数据。

WIPO Lex编号 AU413