About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: About TradeMark x Domain Names dispute

About TradeMark x Domain Names dispute
Marcel Leal (marcel@london-daily.com)
Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:14:56 -0300

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: jpmikus@colby-monet.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: stevec@dave-world.net: "WIPO RFC-1"


Dear Sirs,
I think there's some points that should be addressed about the TradeMark
Owners x DomainName Owners dispute.

1. Some trademark owners failed as a business to give Internet domain
names the importance they deserve, thus leaving their names unregistered
as domain names.
2. Some clever and pioneering entrepeneurs saw the new business
oportunity in registering well-known names as domains to later lease or
sell them. As someone would sell a nice phone number that suits a known
company, like 0800-MyCompany.
3. It was not illegal to do that at the time.
4. These entrepeneurs are not using the domains to broadcast a website
online nor deceiving the public. They're just holding the domain name's
properties.
5. It's an investment as everything else.

Thus:
a. Domain name owners that registered and payed for these domains prior
to the new rules on protecting trademarks should be granted the rights
to these domains.
b. They should be free to lease or sell the domain names but not to use
them to launch a website.
c. They should be allowed to sell or lease these domain names only to
the trademark owners of these names.
In this way the rights to both the domain name holder and the trademark
owner would be guaranteed.

d. After the new rules are published, a trademark owner should be able
to register its name on all top level domains (like .com, .ent, .net,
etc) with a single form and a single discounted payment.
This would decrease the cost and workload of getting a company
trademark to the Internet.
e. Before registering the domains the trademark owner should sent a
proof of ownership to that name's trademark.
f. Payment should be made immediately, online, by credit card.
g. New domain names requested by someone without a trademark proof
should stay in a Request List for 30 days before the right is granted,
so a trademark owner could check to see if anyone is trying to register
its domain.
h. If, after the 30 days, nobody complains about the request with a
trademark proof the person who requested the registry should be granted
the rights to the domain name.
i. Nobody will be allowed to challenge a domain name registry after
that period, even if he has the trademark to that name.
j. The Request List and the Complain Form should be online in a central
Domain List website and be widely advertised. Registrars should
advertise these rules and the Domain List site in their site.

I sincerely think these rules would be fair to everybody, from the
not-well-informed-trademark-owner to the
well-informed-smart-entrepeneur.

Yours,

Marcel Leal
Webmaster

---------------------------------------------------------------London
Daily is at http://www.London-Daily.com
or http://www.London-Daily.co.uk or http://www.uk-daily.com
A newspaper and guide for London, with you in mind

In association with Warp Xperience - www.WarpX.com
---------------------------------------------------------------


Next message: jpmikus@colby-monet.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: stevec@dave-world.net: "WIPO RFC-1"