Thilak Raj, Net Jobs,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0033; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Private, Registration/Dohe Dot,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0753.
Accordingly the Panel finds that the Complainant has established element 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2010-08-02 - Case Details
Further and in any event, for the registrar to allow domain names to be registered in the name of a “privacy service” which provides no mechanism or predictable practice for disclosure of the underlying registrant in the course of proceedings under the Policy, threatens to undermine the integrity of the Policy.
6.6 The reasons for this were set out in detail by this Panel LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. / Domains Secured, LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1857. ...viii) It would therefore appear, inter alia, as a consequence of these decisions, the Registrar must have known or ought to have known that registrations in the name of Private Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft did not accurately record the identity of the registrant of the domain name.
(ix) For the reasons set out in LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. / Domains Secured, LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1857, for a registrar to knowingly allow a third party such as Private Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft to engage in such conduct raises a question as to whether the registrar is in breach of the paragraph 3.7.8 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (“RAA”) between it and ICANN. ...
2012-03-22 - Case Details
As decided in other UDRP cases, "the test of identity or confusing similarity under the Policy is confined to a comparison of the disputed domain name and the trademark alone". LEGO Juris A/S v. Name Administrator, Hong Kong Domains, LLC., supra. See also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2014-11-05 - Case Details
Technology Services Ltd.,
WIPO Zaaknr. DNL2008-0002; en LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Zaaknr. DNL2009-0052). Indien de Eiser hieraan voldoet, dan rust op de Verweerder de bewijslast aan te tonen dat hij een recht op of legitiem belang bij de Domeinnaam heeft.
...
2013-02-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is not an authorised reseller or distributor of the Complainant’s products. Applying the comments of the panelist in Lego Juris A/S v. Probuilders,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0226, the sale of the Complainant’s products by the Respondent under the banner of the Complainant’s logo and trade mark is clearly designed to imply a connection between the Respondent and the Complainant.
...
2013-05-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is not an authorised reseller or distributor of the Complainant’s products. Applying the comments of the panelist in Lego Juris A/S v. Probuilders,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0226, the sale of purportedly the Complainant’s products by the Respondent under the banner of the Complainant’s logo and trade mark is clearly designed to imply a connection between the Respondent and the Complainant.
...
2013-05-08 - Case Details
See Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba dba Toshiba Corporation v. WUFACAI,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0768; LEGO Juris A/S v. Budi Irshandi / Cha Licious,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2343 (for “uk”); Karen Millen Fashions Limited v. ...
2014-05-26 - Case Details
Although the significance of the letters “tg” is unclear, the Panel finds that the OSRAM trademark is “the dominant portion of the domain name”, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Tech Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2011-2286, and the OSRAM trademark in the Disputed Domain Name represents “the most prominent part of the disputed domain name which will attract consumers’ attention.” ...
2015-09-09 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-08-28 - Case Details
It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the Domain Name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-06-05 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-04-30 - Case Details
It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-04-29 - Case Details
The Panel notes that the Complainant's allegations make out a prima facie case of the Respondent's lack of rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Park Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-02-02 - Case Details
DBR2013-0010; Globex Utilidades S/A (Globex) e Nova Pontocom Comércio Eletrônico S/A (Nova Pontocom) v. André Ribeiro,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2012-0012; Lego System A/S v. Omar Quadros Motta,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2014-0001; e Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras v. ...
2016-10-31 - Case Details
In addition, it has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of the corresponding trademark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-10-28 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have ruled that gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark (see Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-28 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of a domain name's registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2016-01-06 - Case Details
It contends that the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a well known mark is an act of bad faith in itself. In support of that contention it refers to LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-03-10 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-10-10 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-22 - Case Details