It has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-08-28 - Case Details
It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the Domain Name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-06-05 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-04-30 - Case Details
It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-04-29 - Case Details
The Panel notes that the Complainant's allegations make out a prima facie case of the Respondent's lack of rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Park Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-02-02 - Case Details
DBR2013-0010; Globex Utilidades S/A (Globex) e Nova Pontocom Comércio Eletrônico S/A (Nova Pontocom) v. André Ribeiro,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2012-0012; Lego System A/S v. Omar Quadros Motta,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2014-0001; e Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras v. ...
2016-10-31 - Case Details
In addition, it has been held in previous UDRP cases that knowledge of the corresponding trademark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2015-10-28 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have ruled that gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark (see Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-28 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of a domain name's registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2016-01-06 - Case Details
It contends that the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a well known mark is an act of bad faith in itself. In support of that contention it refers to LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-03-10 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-10-10 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-22 - Case Details
DBR2013-0010; Globex Utilidades S/A (Globex) e Nova Pontocom Comércio Eletrônico S/A (Nova Pontocom) v. André Ribeiro,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2012-0012; e Lego System A/S v. Omar Quadros Motta,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2014-0001.
2 De acordo com o art. 22 do Regulamento, o NIC.br procederá à implementação desta decisão no décimo quinto dia útil após o recebimento da notificação da decisão. ...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
Thilak Raj, Net Jobs,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0033; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Private, Registration / Dohe Dot,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0753.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which it has rights. ...
2011-03-17 - Case Details
In connection with the burden of proof, several decisions of UDRP panels have held that “[o]nce a Complainant establishes prima facie showing that none of the three circumstances establishing legitimate interests or rights applies, the burden of production on this factor shifts to the Respondents to rebut the showing.” See LEGO Juris A/S v. Chung Hong Phil,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1288; Ets Leobert, SARL v. Jeonggon Seo,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-11-14 - Case Details
This does not alter the overall impression of the disputed domain name and does not take away the Panel’s finding that the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s OAKLEY marks are confusingly similar (e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. Mike Morgan,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0438).
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy requires that the Complainant demonstrates that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2011-11-10 - Case Details
The name registered by the Respondent, unlike, for example, “Lego” or “Coca-Cola” is a common, everyday word which does not suggest, merely by its use, that the Respondent could only have been attempting to gain a commercial advantage from registering the disputed domain name and thereby trade off the reputation of the Complainant.
...
2012-05-10 - Case Details
Numerous .nl panels have found that a domain name that wholly incorporates a complainant’s registered mark may be sufficient to establish confusing similarity for the purpose of the Regulations (see, e.g., Stichting VVV Groep Nederland v. C. Henriquez,
WIPO Case No. DNL2008-0040 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Nick Terlouw,
WIPO Case No. DNL2011-0023).
The Domain Name incorporates the entirety of the textual components of the Trade Mark.
...
2012-10-10 - Case Details
DNL2010-0024, in which case the words “specialist” and “shop” were considered descriptive and generic. See also: LEGO Juris A/S v. Nick Terlouw,
WIPO Case No. DNL2011-0023; and Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. v. Lotom Group S.A.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-02-10 - Case Details
D2010-0636, the same methodology was employed, as was also the case in LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840, and in L’Oréal v. Rampe Purda / Privacy--Protect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-09-17 - Case Details