Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The LEGO trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets, among other products and services. ...
2012-11-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Giorgi Robitashvili
Case No. D2011-1562
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant owns also 1,000 domain names including LEGO. The list of the said domain names has been attached to the Complaint. Among these domain names, the following domain name registrations are mentioned: <lego-star-wars.net>, <lego-star-wars.org>, and <lego-starwars.us>.
...
2011-12-19 - Case Details
The Complainant, based in Denmark (Annex 7 to the Complaint) is the owner of LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other “Lego” branded products. ...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840) and that LEGO is clearly a well-known mark (LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260). In the present case, the disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO (LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-09-11 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant is a Danish company, owner of LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260 (“In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-01-15 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is based in Denmark (Annex 7 of the Complaint) and is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The “Mixels” are three different comical, mischievous creatures. The Complainant has the Mixels as figures, as “LEGO Mixels Game”, a “LEGO Mixels App” and “LEGO Mixels films” (see Annex 10.1 of the Complaint).
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2014-07-31 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Toy sotred
Case No. D2024-3972
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
Complainant is a company organized under the laws of Denmark that is the worldwide well-known producer
of LEGO branded construction toys and related LEGO products.
Complainant has provided evidence that it is the registered owner of numerous trademarks worldwide
relating to its company name and brand LEGO, inter alia, but not limited to, the following:
- word mark LEGO, United Arab Emirates (“UAE”), registration number: 252230, registration date: February
8, 2018, status: active; and
- word mark LEGO, Denmark (“DK”), registration number: VR195400604, registration date: May 1, 1954,
status: active.
...
2024-11-05 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. christian na
Case No. D2022-4856
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant makes and sells LEGO-branded toys and has subsidiaries and branches throughout the
world. The LEGO trademark of the Complainant is registered in many jurisdictions in relation to toys. ...
2023-03-27 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the LEGO trade mark and all other trade marks that are
used in connection with the Lego brand construction toys and other Lego branded products. ...The Complainant submits that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trade mark LEGO. The dominant part of the Disputed Domain Names comprises the entire term Lego, which
is identical to the Complainant’s registered trade mark LEGO and the domain name . ...
2022-07-06 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant is the owner of LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous Lego brands of construction toys and other Lego branded products. ...The disputed domain name resolves to a website with sponsored links related to the brand Lego. When clicking on the links Internet users are redirected to online chops where e.g. Lego products can be acquired. ...
2013-01-10 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of several LEGO international trademarks and multiple LEGO trademarks around the world, such as the LEGO trademark No. 66677, registered in Republic of Korea in International class 28 in January 21, 1980, and duly renewed.
The term “lego” is also the Company’s name.
Complainant also developed a presence on the Internet and is the owner of several domain names which contain the term “lego”.
...
2012-12-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant states that it has registered the LEGO trademark in many countries and over 1,000 domain names containing the term “LEGO”. It follows the strict policy that all domain names containing the word “LEGO” should be owned by the Complainant. ...The Panel will therefore examine in this present case as follows; (a) “city” and “lego” in the first disputed domain name, (b) “duplo” and “lego” in the second disputed domain name, (c) “ninjago” and “lego” in the third disputed domain name.
...
2013-08-30 - Case Details
The LEGO Group also uses the LEGO trademark for computer hardware and software, books, videos, and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...The “lego” element is identical to the LEGO trademark, while the other elements added to it either reflect a commercial offering or are descriptive of the products sold under the LEGO trademark and do not dispel confusing similarity.
...
2019-05-20 - Case Details
The Complainant is also the owner of numerous domain names containing the term "lego".
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on July 11, 2016.
The Panel accessed the disputed domain name on February 28, 2017, when it was linked to a website containing reproductions of the LEGO trademark and toys, stating it is "your go to LEGO news & product website!". ...See for example, the LEGO Group's Fair Play Policy regarding proper use of the LEGO trademark where it is stated: "If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. ...
2017-03-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant in this proceeding, LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, is the owner of the world-renowned LEGO trademark used in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products.
...The LEGO trademark is well known around the world.
The Complainant is, inter alia, the owner of United States trademark registration number 1018875 for the LEGO mark, granted in August 26, 1975.
...
2021-05-05 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Brannum
Case No. D2010-0146
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Complainant
Complainant asserts that it is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...
2010-04-08 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S, v. Anton -
Case No. D2010-0237
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...These marks are used in connection with the famous LEGO and MINDSTORMS brands of construction toys and other LEGO products.
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark 1934, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2010-05-18 - Case Details
Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant’s LEGO Trademark has acquired the status of a well-known mark as it has been recognized by previous UDRP Panels in LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0680, and LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-04-24 - Case Details
Moreover, the LEGO Trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO Trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2019-01-08 - Case Details
The Complainant argues that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to its LEGO series trademarks. The Disputed Domain Name comprises the term “Lego”, which is identical to the LEGO trademark that the Complainant has registered around the world. ...The word “shop” before and after the LEGO trademark does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s LEGO trademark because the Complainant’s LEGO trademark is clearly recognizable in the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2021-09-15 - Case Details
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...However, as evidenced by the Complainant the numbers “4709” are not random numbers, for those lego fans and connoisseur “LEGO 4709” refers to a specific lego product – the Hogwarts Castle.
Since the disputed domain name clearly refers to a LEGO product and the website also clearly referred to LEGO products at the time the Complaint was filed one can reasonably conclude that the Respondent had knowledge of the existence of the LEGO trademark. ...
2011-02-14 - Case Details