known trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark...
2011-04-28 - Case Details
Palmolive, Disney, The Gap, Honda, IBM, Lego, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble, Sony, Swatch, Toshiba, and Visa. Nearly all of Yahoo!�s current Internet services...
2001-02-01 - Case Details
域名,在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果 ( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei, WIPO 案件编号 D2014-0080 )。此外,专家...
2015-01-21 - Case Details
,中心在整个行政过程中一直使用两种语言(中文和英文)与当事人双方联系。 鉴于此,为了不给投诉人带来不必要的资金负担和不便以及不延误行政程序,专家组决定接受投诉人所提交的英文版投诉书及相关材料,不要求投诉人提供中文翻译文本。但是,专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉...
2015-07-22 - Case Details
connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith ( LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte , WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 ; and Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis...
2015-07-08 - Case Details
别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果 ( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1611 ; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei , WIPO 案件编号 D2014-0080 )。 因此,专家组认定,争议域名与投诉...
2015-05-28 - Case Details
金负担和不便,专家组决定接受投诉人所提交的英文版投诉书及材料,不要求投诉人提供中文翻译文本。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Zhong Huijie , WIPO 案件编号 D2011-1381 。 6.2 裁决 根据政策第4条(a)项的规定,投诉书必须同时符合以下三个要素,方能胜诉。 (i...
2015-05-26 - Case Details
LEGO Juris A/S 诉 lihailiang , WIPO 案件编号 DSO2011-0002 )。 WIPO Overview 2.0的第3.2 段进而要求专家组必须考察各种情况以认定被投诉人行为是否具有恶意,并列举了几种可被视为恶意的情况,包括投诉人拥有知名商标;被投诉人未作出答辩;隐瞒身份...
2015-05-19 - Case Details
group of companies or individuals. As noted in LEGO Juris A/S v Private, Registration/Dohe Dot , WIPO Case No. D2009-0753 , the addition of a term that is...
2013-10-23 - Case Details
有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 )。 至于英文“hotel”,其中文可译为“旅馆”,是一个普通名词;而“-”符号只是英文中常见的连结符号。两者都无法产生区别本案争议域名与投诉人的GRAND...
2013-10-21 - Case Details
顶级域名,本身也未具备任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果 ( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 )。 因此,本案争议域名 的主要识别部分为“taylorwimpey”,与投诉人拥有的TAYLOR WIMPEY商标完全相同。 专家组认定,争...
2013-07-26 - Case Details
D2009-0093 and followed in Intersections Inc. v. Jasper Developments Pty. Ltd ., WIPO Case No. D2009-0795 ; LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com Domain Privacy...
2010-06-01 - Case Details
Complainant relied upon the decision of LEGO Juris A/S v. Le Thi Ngoc Yen , WIPO Case No. D2012-1627 . The Complainant asserted that even if Italy did not have...
2013-06-10 - Case Details
Complainant, it is clear that no bona fide or legitimate use of the Disputed Domain Name can reasonably be claimed by the Respondent ( LEGO Juris A/S v...
2013-05-10 - Case Details
use well-known trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See LEGO Juris A/S v...
2013-05-07 - Case Details
Complainant submits that this fact is on its own sufficient to prove the second criterion of the Policy and relies upon the previous UDRP decision of LEGO Juris...
2013-04-10 - Case Details
“[t]he disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark LEGO, the mere inclusion of an additional letter, in the present case the letter “s...
2006-08-21 - Case Details
诉书及相关材料,不要求投诉人提供中文翻译本。专家组亦决定接受被投诉人以中文发送的邮件。专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事双方造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。并且,专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉Zhong Huijie ,, WIPO 案件编号...
2015-10-20 - Case Details
faith ( LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte , WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 ; and Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC , WIPO Case No. D2006-0303 )”; (ii) PepsiCo...
2015-10-06 - Case Details
Nuclear Marshmallows , 同上 和 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 lihailiang , WIPO 案件编号 DSO2011-0002 。 WIPO Overview 2.0的第3.2 段进而要求专家组必须考察各种情况以认定被投诉人的行为是否具有恶意,并列举了几种可被视为恶意的情况,包...
2015-10-02 - Case Details