In these circumstances, the Panel finds that the Oki Data test has not been passed by the Respondent (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311; Oath Inc. v. Adit Gupta,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2523).
...
2021-06-18 - Case Details
UDRP panels have
consistently found bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(b)(iv) in cases involving similar unauthorized
domain name use (LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org and Sun Chong,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2263).
...
2022-11-04 - Case Details
Given the reputation of the PATHE trademark and the unlikelihood of the Respondent selecting the disputed
domain name for registration by chance, the Panel infers that the registration of the disputed domain name
intended to draw income from the improper use of the connection to the Complainant was registration in bad
faith. (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Floyd Goddard/ Oneandone, Private Registration, WIPO Case No.
D2010-0544, the panel stated: “The Panel, in accordance with previous decisions issued under the UDRP,
is of the opinion that actual knowledge of the Complainant’s trademarks and activities at the time of the
registration of the disputed domain may be considered an inference of bad faith.”)
...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
Such intentional targeting in
bad faith is only further underscored by WhoIs evidence proffered by Complainant to show that Respondent
has also targeted third party trademarks including CROCS, LEGO, NIKE, and TWITTER. Under the
circumstances, any good faith or otherwise legitimate uses are rather implausible.
...
2022-08-19 - Case Details
This
is a long-standing criterion to assess whether Respondent has right or interest in the Disputed Domain
Name. (Also see, LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-10-27 - Case Details
D2018-1291, ; eBay Inc. v. ebayMoving / Izik Apo,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1307, ; LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1290, .
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VIRGIN and VIRGIN GALACTIC trademarks in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2021-10-21 - Case Details
D2020-2500 (“using the Domain Names to host fraudulent email addresses in aid of a phishing scam cannot be considered a legitimate reason for registering the Domain Name”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-11-09 - Case Details
A party that wishes a change of language – in this case only the Response is in Dutch – should substantiate that it would be unreasonably onerous if the submission were to be in English (e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052). The Respondent has motivated its request for a translation of the Complaint by stating that its command of English is insufficient to understand the Complaint. ...
2020-07-21 - Case Details
Bad faith may be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that said use of the domain name by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-01-08 - Case Details
This disruption is a further indicator of use in bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Aamir Abdul Wahid, Spiro Line Media,
WIPO Case No. D2019-0245.
(v) The Respondent’s website seems to violate the TikTok application’s terms of service, which in the circumstances of this case, and noting the use of the disputed domain name, further supports the Panel’s finding on the Respondent’s bad faith. ...
2021-07-06 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels considering this issue came to the same conclusion. Please see LEGO Juris A/S v. lin zhang,
WIPO Case No. D2020-0675. Therefore, the Panel disregards the gTLD for the purposes of this comparison.
...
2021-08-26 - Case Details
This disruption of the Complainant’s business is a further indicator of use in bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Aamir Abdul Wahid, Spiro Line Media,
WIPO Case No. D2019-0245.
(v) The Panel is entitled to have regard to the lack of any substantive response on this point from the Respondent and draws an adverse inference from this.
...
2021-07-28 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain name (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich / Protection of Private Person,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
Furthermore, the Respondent has no right or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name resolving to an inactive website at the time of this decision (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2021-03-04 - Case Details
Customer 0158491442 / Terry Sybert,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2167; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Private Whois, Knock Knock WHOIS Not There, LLC / Legos Deak,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2385.
...
2021-04-08 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-03-17 - Case Details
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been aware of the
Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when registering and using the Disputed Domain Name
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2025-06-03 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2025-06-12 - Case Details
Numerous panels have viewed website suspension by the registrar or webhost, absent any explanation or
attempted justification by the respondent, as added corroboration of bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v.
Ammar Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a
takedown request by Complainant); Hershey Entertainment & Resorts Company v. ...
2026-01-30 - Case Details
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Panel finds that the Respondent was likely
aware of the Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when it registered the Disputed Domain Name,
given the well-known and distinctive nature of the Complainant’s brand, evidenced by the various trademark
registrations for the Complainant’s Trademark that was put into use before the Respondent registered the
Disputed Domain Name. ...
2025-09-29 - Case Details
That aural resemblance is increased to the extent that the public may refer to the
Complainant as “Medtronics” as, for example, people often mistakenly refer to “Lego” as “Legos”, or
“Legoes”.
As this requirement under the Policy is essentially a standing requirement, therefore, the replacement of the
“ic” component of the Complainant’s trademark with “ex” does not preclude a finding of confusing similarity.
...
2025-02-19 - Case Details