Rohan mubbahir Kahn, WIPO Case
No. D2021-1314; LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davis, WIPO Case No. D2018-0313 and Victorinox AG v. Andre
Freitas, Result Capital WIPO Case No. ...
2023-05-04 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration
Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case
No. ...
2023-09-19 - Case Details
参见 Mastercard International Inc.诉 Better, Deals; Finestnames.com，WIPO 案件编号
D2009-0702；Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated and Dunkin’ Donuts USA, Inc.诉 Dazzledesigns，WIPO 案件编
号 D2004-0436；LEGO Juris A/S 诉 bangfei jiang，WIPO 案件编号 D2012-1235。因此，被投诉人曾经将争
议域名用于含有成人内容的网站的这一行为构成恶意，且专家组认为被投诉人的这一行为损害了投诉人商标的
声誉，破坏了投诉人正常的业务活动。
...
2024-01-09 - Case Details
关于该些字母，专家组认为它们都不具有区别争议域名与投诉人商标的显著效果。关于通用顶级域名后缀，专家组认为在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果（参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080）。...
2016-11-14 - Case Details
其唯一其余部分为一个顶级域名后缀“.mom”，可译为“妈妈”。专家组认为该顶级域名后缀在本案中不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果 (参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080）。...
2016-11-08 - Case Details
A gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to dispel confusing similarity with a trademark as it is typically disregarded under the first element test. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-11-02 - Case Details
Previous Panels have held that the registration of a domain name obviously connected with well-known trademarks by someone without any connection to these trademarks suggests opportunistic bad faith. See, among others, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494.
At the time of initial filing of the Complaint, the Respondent employed a privacy service to hide his identity, which past panels have held serves as further evidence of bad faith registration and use. ...
2016-09-20 - Case Details
Dublin) Limited v. Dejan Macesic,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1698; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311).
The website to which the disputed domain name resolves features advertisements associated with third parties. ...
2016-10-20 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name's registration can suggest bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2016-10-12 - Case Details
In previous decisions, UDRP panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed considering Respondent’s use of the disputed domain names(Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-25 - Case Details
A TLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark for the purposes of a comparison under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-12-14 - Case Details
诉 Mika Harms, Hackett Shop UK，WIPO 案件编号D2017-2114。关于通用顶级域名，专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080。...
2018-06-22 - Case Details
De este modo lo han entendido otros expertos en anteriores decisiones como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2018-01-08 - Case Details
While this element is not present in the Complainant’s VENTE-PRIVEE and logo trademarks, a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-06-01 - Case Details
The Complainant cited, inter alia, the cases of LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091, and LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE, L'ORÉAL v. 10 Selling,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-05-19 - Case Details
The Panel accepts that the Respondent has not acquired trademark or service mark rights, that the Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by the Complainant and that, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its widely-known trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-05-31 - Case Details
Such facts establishes bad faith registration and use pursuant to paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd / Dzone Inc., Yeonju Hong,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2442 (finding that respondent was using the domain name as a parked pay-per-click page and was, thus, intentionally attempting to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of its website).
...
2017-07-05 - Case Details
Ello, aunado al hecho de que el Titular haya registrado nombres de dominio que corresponden a marcas de terceros que amparan aires acondicionados, así como que ha registrado el nombre de dominio , mismo que resuelve al sitio Web de un competidor de la Promovente, permite inferir que el Titular tenía conocimiento del sector de los aires acondicionados en México, y en el balance de las probabilidades de la Promovente y de su marca CLIMAPROYECTOS al momento del registro del nombre de dominio en disputa, lo cual constituye mala fe en el registro del mismo (ver LEGO Juris A/S c. pcmaniabg, Paisiy Aleksandrov,
Caso OMPI No. D2010-1965; Etihad Airways c. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-11-06 - Case Details
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-14 - Case Details
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-01-19 - Case Details