About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.033 sec)

Rows

<<  <  321 - 340  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1562 for legoshop.site, legoshops.com, legoshops.online, лего.online pdf (239 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Reg Com Case No. D2022-1562 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including the Russian Federation. The Complainant is the owner of the following trademark registrations for the sign LEGO (the “LEGO trademark”): - The trademark LEGO with registration No. 42932, registered in the Russian Federation on December 10, 1971 for goods in International Class 28. ...

2022-07-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2086 for lego.bid, lego.london html (18 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Alexander Newton Case No. D2014-2086 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant Identical or confusingly similar The Domain Names comprise the term LEGO, identical to the Complainant's world famous LEGO trademark. The fame of the trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions. ...

2015-01-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1050 for legovideogames.net html (24 KB)

D2010-0470. 15 Paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. 16 Id. 17 See, e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. An Bui, WIPO Case No. D2010-1169; LEGO Juris A/S v. XMGlobal Inc, WIPO Case No. D2010-1168; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...D2010-1015; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc./ Phoenix Productions, WIPO Case No. D2010-0798; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2011-08-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0869 for elego.top pdf (217 KB)

The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos, and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...The LEGO trademark also risks being tarnished by being associated with the Respondent’s Website. By using the trademark LEGO as a dominant part of the Disputed Domain Name, the Respondent exploits the goodwill and the image of the LEGO trademark, which may result in dilution and other damage for the LEGO trademark. ...

2023-05-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1316 for newlegokits.com html (22 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Seth Landau Case No. D2009-1316 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services of Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant is a Danish company that makes and sells the famous Lego brand of construction toys and other Lego branded products. The Complainant and its associated companies are the owners of many international trademarks for LEGO. ...

2009-11-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1189 for ilego.me, lego.kim, lego.top, lego.xin, lego.我爱你, legobrick.cc, legoclub.cc, legoclub.co, legoclub.me, legohb.com, legoland.ren, legoland.xin, legopub.org, legoset.cc, legoyb.com html (28 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Quan Zheng / Zheng Quan / 郑权 Case No. D2017-1189 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant further contends that its LEGO and LEGOLAND trademarks are well-known mark, as defined by the Paris convention. The Complainant further argues that the disputed domain names , , <lego.我爱你> and contain the Complainant’s LEGO trademark in its entirety, thus resulting in domain names that are identical to the Complainant’s LEGO trademark. ...

2017-08-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2440 for legodoc.com html (34 KB)

This website contains several theme related sub-websites such as “Lego Universe”, “Lego City” or “Lego Friends”. These sub-websites are linked with the main entrance page through a system of third level domains. ...term lego)” where it is written: ”In a nod to kids' high-tech skills, it also offers LEGO kits to build PC- programmable robots (including Spybotics and Mindstorms) Lego- a slang term for let's go“. ...

2013-03-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1710 for legomobil.com html (8 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and various other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand for construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Complainant The dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the word “lego”, which is identical to the Complainant's registered trademark LEGO. The fame of the LEGO trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions. ...

2010-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0113 for lego.onl html (9 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is part of the LEGO Group which commercializes worldwide child products, in particular the famous LEGO building bricks. ...- CTM Registration for the figurative mark LEGO No. 000039834, in international classes 3, 9, 16, 20, 24, 25, 28 and 42 of November 9, 1998. - UK Registration for the word mark LEGO No. ...

2015-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0862 for legomindstormsrcx.com html (10 KB)

In 1998, Complainant created a line of programmable construction toys known as Lego Mindstorms. The Lego Mindstorms toys were designed to run on an rcx platform. Accordingly, the toys are commonly known as Lego Mindstorms Rcx robotics or construction toys. ...Several of the other domain names that Complainant owns incorporate the term MINDSTORMS as well as LEGO, including <lego-mindstorms.com>; <lego-mindstormsnxt.com>; ; ; and . ...

2011-07-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2130 for legometaverse.top pdf (135 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...As the LEGO trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s LEGO trademark. ...

2023-07-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1470 for legotoys.club html (11 KB)

This mark issued in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO products. The Complainant and its licensees, through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark 1934, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...Moreover, this disputed domain name may be likely confused as part of the “family of websites” created by the Complainant under the LEGO mark umbrella, such as <lego‑believe.com>; <lego-games.com>; <lego-shop.de> and even <lego-mindstorms.com>, among several others. ...

2016-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2225 for legorobots.net html (11 KB)

The LEGO brand commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States in 1953 to identify construction toys made and sold by the Complainant. ...The Complainant is also the owner of more than 2400 domain names containing the term LEGO. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trade mark to include computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...

2013-02-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0438 for legosuniverse.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Mike Morgan Case No. D2009-0438 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Complainant The Complainant claims inter alia that the dominant part of the domain name comprises the word “lego”, which is identical to the registered trademark LEGO. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark LEGO. ...

2009-06-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0814 for legomegastore.com html (12 KB)

Complainant The Complainant states that it has registered the LEGO trademark in many countries and over 1,000 domain names containing the term “LEGO”. It follows the strict policy that all domain names containing the word “LEGO” should be owned by the Complainant. ...The Respondent operate its website, which has a title (top area of the website) as “LEGO STORE, LEGO STORE, REVIEW LEGO, BUY LEGO, LEGO TOYS” “powered by amazon.com”. However, actually, it has links to toy products not only by the Complainant but also by other competing companies such as Megablocks, Revell, Imagebloks and so on. ...

2013-07-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0495 for legoland.wiki pdf (140 KB)

The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background As of January 1, 2025, LEGO Juris A/S has been renamed to LEGO Holding A/S to bring together all LEGO branded and related activities under one governance structure, including LEGO Juris A/S and all rights/licenses to the LEGO brand. The Complainant is the owner of LEGO, LEGOLAND, and other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products, including Indonesia trademark registration No. ...

2025-04-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0738 for legocon.com html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. David Holm Case No. D2021-0738 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant in this proceeding, LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, is the owner of the world-renowned LEGO trademark used in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products. ...

2021-05-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1715 for legonetworks.com html (11 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Denmark. The Complainant and its licensees, The LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group is, as can be read out of the Complaint and the website “www.lego.com”, a global toy manufacturing group of companies and the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. The Complainant is the owner of more than 300 domain names containing the term LEGO. The LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group, through its predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...

2009-01-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DNL2009-0052 for legoracers.nl html (13 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant holds a Benelux LEGO word mark, as well as a Community LEGO word mark. Therefore, the Panelist finds that the Complainant has rights in the LEGO trademarks protected under Dutch law. ...D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case D2009-0680). ...

2009-12-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0381 for legolandusa.com html (13 KB)

The Complainant is also the owner of more than 450 domain names containing the term “lego” or “legoland”. The trademark LEGO has been used and is known around the world, due in part to decades of extensive advertising, which prominently depicts the LEGO mark on all products, packaging, displays, advertising, and promotional materials. ...Complainant The Complainant claims that the dominant part of the domain name comprises the words “lego” and “legoland”, which are identical to the registered trademarks LEGO and LEGOLAND. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's marks LEGO and LEGOLAND. ...

2009-06-11 - Case Details