About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.043 sec)

Rows

<<  <  341 - 360  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3068 for brickmanlego.com, legoexhibition.com, legoexhibitions.com, legoisawesome.com pdf (138 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Perfect Privacy LLC / Rockefeller Productions Case No. D2022-3068 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Each of the disputed domain names wholly incorporates the LEGO word mark and the Panel therefore finds that they are each confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trade mark rights for LEGO. ...

2022-11-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-2133 for legobricks.info html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Oxana Mishukova Case No. D2011-2133 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group”) have grown to a worldwide business, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2010 exceeding USD 3 billion. ...

2012-02-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0658 for minotaurusbylego.com html (14 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the trademark LEGO. The name LEGO is widely associated with a certain type of construction toy based on coloured plastic bricks and components that click together, and an assortment of other LEGO branded products. ...Colour images are shown of the packaging for “Minotaurus by LEGO”, “LEGO 3842 Lunar Command Game”, “LEGO Monster 4 Game”, and “LEGO Creationary Game”, each accompanied with typical pricing information. ...

2011-06-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1413 for legostarwarsvideogame.info html (14 KB)

The Complainant has used its LEGO mark in commerce since 1953. The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and Lego products are sold in more than 130 countries. ...Therefore, the inclusion of the STAR WARS trademark serves to heighten the risk of confusion by Internet users. See LEGO Juris A/S, v. Lego Star Wars Minifigs, WIPO Case No. D2011-1231 and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainsByProxy.com / DBA David Inc, WIPO Case No. ...

2011-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1555 for lego-rag.com html (14 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant, based in Denmark is the owner of LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has registered trademark rights in the trademark LEGO. The Respondent has registered the Domain Name <lego-rag.com>, which merely adds the word “rag” to the trademark LEGO. ...

2011-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1642 for legofiretruck.net html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Abi Wada/ WhoisGuard Case No. D2011-1642 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...In addition to these trademarks, the Complainant has produced evidence showing that it is the owner of numerous LEGO trademarks throughout the world. The Complainant also holds hundreds of domain names consisting of or containing the name "lego", including . ...

2011-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1195 for rumahlego.com html (15 KB)

Complainant Complainant argues that it is the owner of numerous trademark registrations around the world for the trademark LEGO, that it has been using the LEGO trademark in the United States since 1953, that its revenue in 2009 exceeded USD 2.8 billion, that it has registered more than 2,400 domain names incorporating the trademark LEGO, and that the LEGO trademark is famous. ...Respondent further asserts that “The main concept of RumahLego precense is to provide a playground center whereby Lego products as the instrument (i.e Toys) including Lego robotic simulation and it can be Lego product awareness at local market Jakarta/Indonesia (positive side) to maximize the logic simulation by using Lego products”. ...

2012-09-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0901 for legonasa.com html (15 KB)

Therefore, in these combinations the word “lego” stands out and may lead the public to believe that there is an association with the well-known LEGO trademark”, (See LEGO Juris A/S v. ...The Respondent’s website constitutes a domain parking page, which has web-searching function and links to LEGO toy related websites such as “LEGO STARWARS” which is a new LEGO product line, although almost all links are dead links. ...

2013-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3066 for legotrump.xyz pdf (144 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Oz Sahman, Aozu Case No. D2024-3066 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark LEGO, as the dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the term “Lego”, identical to the registered trademark LEGO of the Complainant. ...

2024-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0239 for lego-town.com html (16 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Viktor Tkachev, Lego Town Case No. D2016-0239 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...Complainant commenced use of the LEGO Mark through its predecessor in 1934. The LEGO brand is known worldwide and has received numerous accolades. ...

2016-04-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1677 for legoshuttleadventure.com html (16 KB)

The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the LEGO trademark. The dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the word LEGO. The addition of the suffix “shuttleadventure” does not diminish the overall impact of the name LEGO; rather it enhances the relationship with the LEGO trademark. ...The Complainant states that given the fame of the LEGO trademark then it can be assumed the Respondent knew of the LEGO trademark at the time of registration. ...

2011-12-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0490 for legoland-florida.com html (16 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. James Holmes Case No. D2012-0490 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Complainant Complainant first highlights the worldwide notoriety of its trademark LEGO which has been extensively used throughout the world for more than 50 years to designate construction toys and many other LEGO branded products and adds in support of this assertion the Superbrands UK survey listing the official top 500 Superbrands for 2009/2010 positioning the LEGO brand among the top 10 most famous brands in the world. ...

2012-06-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-1940 for legotoystores.com pdf (219 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Lego Juris A/S v. 深圳市野马部落网络科技有限公司 Case No. D2023-1940 1. The Parties Complainant is Lego Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Complainant has therefore proven that it has the requisite rights in the LEGO trademarks. Here, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s LEGO trademark. The LEGO trademark is recognizable in the Domain Name. ...

2023-06-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2675 for legohub.store html (18 KB)

The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background The Complainant, LEGO Juris A/S, a limited company incorporated in Denmark, is the owner of the LEGO trademark and of all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO branded construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Level 5 Corp., WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr., WIPO Case No. ...

2021-10-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0056 for legostarwas.com pdf (79 KB)

Complainant is the owner of numerous registered trademarks for the LEGO mark globally, including: - Danish trademark registration No. VR195400604 for LEGO word mark, registered on May 1, 1954; and - Chinese trademark registration No. 135134 for LEGO word mark, registered on January 5, 1980. Complainant is also the owner of many domain names containing the LEGO mark, including . The Domain Name was registered on May 20, 2022 and reverts to a webpage with commercial Pay-Per- Click (“PPC”) advertising page links, such as: “Lego Star Wars”, “Star Wars Lego Sets”, and “Lego Star Wars at At”. ...

2023-03-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1968 for legobrazil.com, legoca.com, legoengland.com, legoeu.com, legomexico.com, legosouthkorea.com, legothailand.com, legovipclub.com html (20 KB)

The LEGO group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...The fame of the LEGO trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp., WIPO Case No. ...

2018-10-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DUA2020-0001 for legotoys.com.ua html (19 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Anton Obrezkov Case No. DUA2020-0001 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant a privately owned company based in Denmark that owns LEGO trademark, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...

2020-04-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1840 for legowatches.org html (18 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Sharon Carbral Case No. D2011-1840 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant The Complainant is the Danish-based corporation which markets the well-known LEGO branded construction toys and certain other products. Its LEGO trade mark is well-known around the world. ...

2011-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1662 for citylego.com html (17 KB)

Level 5 Corp WIPO Case No. D2008-1692, LEGO Juris A/S v Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2009-1715 and LEGO Juris A/S v Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. ...The disputed domain name comprises the word “lego”, which is, for all purposes, identical to the registered trademark LEGO. The Panel accepts that LEGO is a famous mark (as the Complainant referred to in a number of UDRP cases) and accepts that the disputed domain name contains the instantly recognizable LEGO brand. ...

2013-12-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1991 for legoty.com html (19 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. lanhongying Case No. D2012-1991 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant and its affiliates own numerous trademark registrations for the mark LEGO. For example: Chinese trademark registration No. 75682 – LEGO, with the registration date of December 22, 1976; United States trademark registration No. 2245652 – LEGO, with the registration date of May 18, 1999; United States trademark registration No. 1018875 – LEGO, with the registration date of August 26, 1975; Community trademark registration No. 00039800 – LEGO, with the registration date of October 5, 1998, and many more. ...

2012-12-10 - Case Details