Complainant owns trademark registrations around the world, including in Australia and the United States of America, for the LEGO mark. Complainant also owns more than 450 domain names containing the term “lego”.
Complainant and its licensees commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America in 1953. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The evidence indicates that Complainant has rights in the LEGO mark. The Panel concludes that each of the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to the LEGO mark. ...
2009-09-02 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Miheev Pavel
Case No. D2017-2133
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant in this proceeding, LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, is the owner of the
world-renowned LEGO trademark used in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products.
...
2018-01-22 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Djoko Sutijoko
Case No. D2011-1872
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...This confusion is further attenuated by the fact that the trademark LEGO is widely known globally; and has been the subject of a variety of domain name disputes LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-01-10 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Lego LEGO
Case No. D2022-3335
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
The Respondent is Lego LEGO, Benin.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with Ligne Web Services SARL (the “Registrar”).
3. ...
2022-11-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Kevin Yuan
Case No. D2011-1418
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a corporation based in Denmark and is the owner of the LEGO trademark and other trademarks used in connection with the Lego brands of construction toys and other Lego branded products which it manufactures. ...
2011-10-31 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Onliyou
Case No. D2011-1410
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a corporation based in Denmark and is the owner of the LEGO trademark and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products which it manufactures. ...
2011-10-21 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (Annex 7 to the Complaint). ...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...
2012-02-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Klevrings Sverige AB / Mikael Rendahl
Case No. D2012-0984
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...According to the undisputed allegations and exhibits provided by Complainant, Complainant currently owns numerous trademark registrations (“LEGO Trademarks”) all over the world for LEGO, in particular the Community Trademark LEGO registered on October 5, 1998 (CTM 000039800 for class 3, 9, 14, 16, 20, 24, 25, 28, 38, 41 and 42).
...
2012-07-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. XMGlobal Inc.
Case No. D2010-1168
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services as the resolving website displays pictures and information of different LEGO products;
viii. As in many other recent cases involving registration in bad faith of LEGO domain names, the considerable value and goodwill of the mark LEGO is what most likely made the Respondent register the domain name at issue here;
ix. ...
2010-09-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is based in Denmark and is the owner of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO branded construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos, and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...
2021-02-24 - Case Details
The Complainant particularly believes that due to the fame of the LEGO trademark, the Respondent was aware of the LEGO trademark when it registered the disputed domain name. ...Although not identical, the disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainant’s LEGO trademark.
The disputed domain name differs from the LEGO trademark only by the addition of the generic term “tuğla”, which means “brick” in the Turkish language. ...
2017-05-17 - Case Details
The fame of the LEGO trademark has been confirmed in previous UDRP decisions (LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-07-08 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Edwin Knight
Case No. D2009-0929
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The website linked to the disputed domain name clearly indicates in Japanese that it is a community space of LEGO fans. At the bottom of the screen, the website also contains a disclaimer to the effect that “this site has absolutely no relationship with the official LEGO company, and is being administered individually as a LEGO fan for everyone's enjoyment of LEGO” in Japanese.
...
2009-09-23 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Chi Ray Jasa
Case No. D2023-2725
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...D2006-0270 (“the
worldwide fame of the Complainant’s trademark”); Lego Juris A/S v. Synergy Management, Fred Shear,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1028 (“LEGO is well-known in the United States”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2023-08-31 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Davis Lopez
Case No. D2024-3974
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...No. 1018875, LEGO, registered on August 26, 1975 – Class 28;
- Danish Reg. No. VR195400604, LEGO, registered on May 1, 1954 – Class 28.
...
2024-12-02 - Case Details
Complainant owns several trademarks amongst which we find LEGO, Complainant also owns over 1,700 domain names, most of which use the trademark LEGO in some way or another. ...The trademark LEGO is used to identify construction toys, through extensive marketing and a long history in the industry LEGO is considered a well-known and famous mark. ...
2011-08-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark in which it has exclusive rights worldwide through trademark registration and use. The dominant part of the disputed domain name incorporates the term “lego”, identical to the Complainant’s LEGO trademark, followed by the letter “s” which refers to the plural of “lego” and the descriptive term “shop”.
...At the time of rendering this administrative decision these sponsored links were: “All Lego Star War Toys”, “Discount Weekly Hotel Rates”, “Lego Batman”, “Lego train shop”, “Lego star war mini figure”, “Lego monster sets”, “All lego star war toys”, “Shop building”, “Lego star wars droid sets”, and “New lego ninjago”, eight out of ten of these links containing the LEGO trademark of the Complainant.
...
2015-06-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
According to the information provided in the Complaint, Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark,
and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO
branded products. ...Notably, Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s
trademark LEGO as the dominant part of the Domain Name comprises the term “LEGO”, identical to the
registered trademark LEGO.
...
2025-11-21 - Case Details
Its business activities consist, inter alia, in holding and licensing out the trademark portfolio of the LEGO brand.
The Complainant is owner of several registered trademarks LEGO and DIMENSIONS worldwide, inter alia, in the United States of America ("United States") for LEGO (Reg. ...The Complainant's licensees sell LEGO construction toys and other LEGO branded products in more than 130 countries.
The disputed domain name was registered on January 26, 2016. ...
2016-11-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davis
Case No. D2018-0313
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...It describes itself as “The Lego Superstore” and includes a footer bearing the following text: “Copyright © 2018 The Lego Superstore - All Rights Reserved”.
5. ...
2018-04-16 - Case Details