domain name was created on September 12, 2007. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that as found...Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical to or confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark ZENNI OPTICAL as the only difference is the...
2010-08-10 - Case Details
asserts that the first category of Domain Names is identical and/or confusingly similar to the PIAB trademark registered by the Complainant. The Complainant...Complainant'. The Complainant submits in regard to the second category of Domain Names that they are confusingly similar to the registered PIAB trademark. It...
2002-03-21 - Case Details
disputed domain name, , provided that the Complainant can show that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar By submission to the Panel of clear and...
2014-01-28 - Case Details
2 Billion annually. - The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the COSTCO mark. The disputed domain name contains that entire mark. The...the Complainant can demonstrate that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2012-06-20 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainants The domain name, is confusingly similar to the first Complainant’s trademark CIC, which is reproduced in the domain...from being confusingly similar to the trademark. The domain name, provides hyperlinks to banking and financial services providers. The domain name, is...
2006-05-16 - Case Details
following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. - the Respondent has no rights...is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...
2022-04-21 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...the following three elements in order to prevail in this proceeding: (i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2021-06-25 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...Complainant prove the following three elements in order to prevail in this proceeding: (i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2021-06-25 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its well-known BOURSORAMA trademark and to Complainant’s domain names. Complainant further asserts that the disputed domain name contains...the BOURSORAMA sign at the time it registered the disputed domain name. Moreover, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s...
2021-06-15 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark; that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and that the...satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent...
2022-01-28 - Case Details
are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s KIMLEY-HORN Mark; - the Respondent has no...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...
2022-02-24 - Case Details
confusingly similar domain name. The Complainant also submits that in assessing whether a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark, the...generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) is disregarded. Therefore, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trade mark BELMOND. Furthermore, the...
2023-10-06 - Case Details
Disputed Domain Name; (iii) the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant...has rights in the FLIRT4FREE trademark. The Panel finds the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to this trademark. Previous UDRP panels have...
2023-07-26 - Case Details
Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect...
2002-11-19 - Case Details
Complainant The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered trademarks. The Respondent is guilty of typosquatting. The disputed...elements: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; (ii) The respondent has...
2015-12-08 - Case Details
NOVOTEL. Complainant further contends that the domain name is identical with and confusingly similar to the NOVOTEL mark pursuant to the Policy paragraph 4...contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...
2005-06-02 - Case Details
summarized as follows: The Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trade mark XENICAL in which it clearly has rights. Addition of the generic terms “buy” and...Complainant must satisfy the Panel that: (1) The Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant...
2012-06-06 - Case Details
and used in bad faith and is confusingly similar to the registered marks of Complainant, among other relevant allegations. Respondent has defaulted in...this proceeding. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered mark...
2011-04-21 - Case Details
Complainant The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is (i) confusingly similar to its earlier trademarks, (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or...Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks, which are widely known all over the world, since the disputed domain...
2022-07-04 - Case Details
paragraph 1 sub c of the Community Trademark Regulation. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the trademarks of the Complainant. It is established case...requirements: a. the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark, or trade name, protected under Dutch law in which the complainant has rights...
2012-11-22 - Case Details