’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar The Complainant contends that the...Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s BOLLORE trademark. Since the substitution of the letter “o” by the letter “a” does not...
2020-05-05 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s EDMUND’s trademark and domain...Similar Complainant relies on previous WIPO UDRP decisions recognizing as “ confusingly similar ” and/or “ virtually identical ” the use of terms that are a...
2006-10-24 - Case Details
prove each of the following: (i) The domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has...15(a), it is appropriate to apply rules and principles of American trademark law between the parties. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a...
2006-10-04 - Case Details
Insurance. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant alleges that the domain name is confusingly similar to the AFLAC mark, that Respondent has no...Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2007-05-18 - Case Details
disputed domain name is, therefore, confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Respondent is not a licensee of the Complainant. Nor has the...Complainant granted any permission to the Respondent to use the Complainant’s mark or any domain name incorporating it or one confusingly similar to it. The...
2008-04-14 - Case Details
“thompson” and “grassvalley”, is confusingly similar with their trademarks, the sole difference between the domain name and the “THOMSON” trademark being the...Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name The...
2004-11-10 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s OLX trademark under the Policy. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant submits that the...
2016-06-13 - Case Details
consistently rank its brand in the top ten brands in the world. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark as it...adopt a confusingly similar domain name. It further submits that the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of services but rather is using the...
2023-08-22 - Case Details
administrative proceeding on February 26, 2003. 5. Parties� Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the domain names are confusingly similar to...Commission Junction, which prohibited affiliates from adopting domain names which were confusingly similar to trademarks of the licensors, in this case the...
2003-05-28 - Case Details
domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant states that the Respondent is not a reseller or distributor of the...to be successful, the Complainant must prove (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2014-02-13 - Case Details
marks are "confusingly similar" because the marks are contained within the domain names. (b) Respondent has not been commonly known by the domain names...names or that he has engaged in bad faith. (c) The disputed domain names are neither identical nor confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademarks, since...
2001-01-31 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks BARCLAY and BARCLAYCARD...to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Pursuant to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), a...
2012-12-20 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that it’s registered trademarks for and including BYSTOLIC, referred to in section 4 above, have been in...the treatment of hypertension for which they are registered. Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...
2011-09-14 - Case Details
after it registered the domain name, Respondent registered . Complainant contends Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s...prevail in this proceeding, Complainant must establish that: (i) Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...
2007-05-21 - Case Details
building services. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant ’s trademark. The...” instead of an “i”, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The disputed domain name plainly misappropriates sufficient textual components...
2023-06-08 - Case Details
5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to...Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The...
2009-10-09 - Case Details
the Complainant's contentions: - The Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. - The Respondent has no rights or...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2017-05-15 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark LEXI LOVE, which is...the registered LEXI LOVE mark, which is owned by the Complainant. Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to...
2009-05-26 - Case Details
the Complainant's contentions: - The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's Mark. - The Respondent has no rights or legitimate...(i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The...
2018-01-30 - Case Details
are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant argues that it is the oldest...”, which is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark MEIRC as only one letter is missing. The generic term “training” does not eliminate confusion...
2019-07-16 - Case Details