Complainant The Complainant claims the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its own FACEBOOK trademarks and ownership rights, as it incorporates the...transfer of the disputed domain name may be ordered if the Complainant demonstrates three elements: (a) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar...
2020-06-29 - Case Details
offered a variety of financial services at least confusingly similar to those offered by Complainant and, thereby, prominently displayed Complainant’s...Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar and nearly identical to its FRANKLIN TEMPLETON trademark, as it contains the latter in...
2020-09-07 - Case Details
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s famous VIAGRA trademark. The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s registered...Complainant’s rights in the registered VIAGRA trademark when he registered the confusingly similar disputed domain name; 2) the Respondent has used the...
2020-08-06 - Case Details
following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MIROVA Mark; - the Respondent has no...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2021-03-18 - Case Details
its products. The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its VELUX trademark. It contends that the disputed domain...Respondent is using the disputed domain name, which is confusingly similar to its trademark, misleadingly to divert Internet users to a website offering...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
following assertions: 1. Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s PREMARIN mark. 2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate...domain name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (2) Respondent...
2006-04-04 - Case Details
advertising revenue for the Respondent. B. Respondent The Respondent contends that: (a) the Domain Name is not identical or confusingly similar to the trademark...order to succeed, under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: (i) the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...
2005-11-02 - Case Details
alleges that the domain name at issue is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks. The Domain Name consists entirely of the distinctive term “Ruth’s Chris...each element within paragraph�4(a) of the Policy is present. These are as follows: (i) the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar to...
2005-05-27 - Case Details
the UK and much of the English-speaking world. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant submits that it...knowledge of Complainant’s prior rights, and is a willful infringement of Complainant’s prior rights. Respondent is using the confusingly similar domain name...
2007-02-02 - Case Details
registered with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Complainant alleges the domain name is confusingly similar to its CANADIAN TIRE trademarks...domain name should be cancelled or transferred: (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2006-10-25 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed Domain Name is nearly identical and confusingly similar to Complainant’s KIJIJI trademark...and/or confusingly similar termto the Complainant’s trademark. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6...
2006-09-28 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant asserts that the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the...has rights in a trade or service mark, with which Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar (Paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (2) The...
2007-08-23 - Case Details
Parties' Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the...a confusingly similar domain name by deletion of the letter “s” at the end of the word “baldrick's”; and (iii) use of a confusingly similar domain...
2007-07-19 - Case Details
activities described on the website, “www.kbracquisitions.com”. The Domain Name, , is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark in which Complainants...Discussion and Findings According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, Complainants must prove that: (i) The Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a...
2011-03-14 - Case Details
(a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainants contend that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' trademark BONAFONT. The...Complainants contend that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' trademark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainants contend that...
2010-01-28 - Case Details
similar to the Complainant's mark. Specifically, the Complainant asserts: (1) The Respondent's domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's...Policy: 1. The Complainant has rights in a trade or service mark, with which the Respondent's domain names are identical or confusingly similar (Paragraph...
2009-12-11 - Case Details
contends that the disputed domain name registered by Respondent is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark; that Respondent has no rights or...Similar The Panel holds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark and renowned name. The disputed domain name includes...
2010-06-15 - Case Details
Complainant Complainant alleges that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its mark 1-800-THE-LAW2. Complainant alleges that Respondent does not have any...registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) that the...
2009-06-16 - Case Details
auction. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...has rights The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is virtually identical and thus confusingly similar to Complainant's PRINCIPAL marks...
2009-02-27 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to Complainant's ABERCROMBIE and ABERCROMBIE & FITCH trademarks, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...each of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2009-02-05 - Case Details