directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following: (a) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to...
2000-06-14 - Case Details
1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2000-05-10 - Case Details
directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following: (a) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to...
2000-06-30 - Case Details
the Complainant must prove each of the following: (a) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2000-06-30 - Case Details
whether the Complainant has established its complaint. (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...
2000-06-27 - Case Details
the following elements are present: (1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2000-07-28 - Case Details
registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) that the...
2000-08-08 - Case Details
registered by Potter are identical and confusingly similar to TMP�s federally registered marks. According to the declaration of Mr. Klapper, during his initial...
2000-08-16 - Case Details
(1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2000-10-09 - Case Details
the ICANN policy, as follows:- (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2000-10-25 - Case Details
5 (e). In accordance with the ICANN Policy, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2001-04-16 - Case Details
has met all the requirements set forth in para. 4.a. of the Policy. First, there is no question that the domain name in dispute is confusingly similar...
2001-04-26 - Case Details
Complainants contend that: (a) The domain name at issue is identical and therefore confusingly similar to the various trademarks including the word UNIFON that...
2001-07-05 - Case Details
4 of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("the Policy"), a complainant must prove (i) that the domain name is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2001-05-28 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each of the following (Policy, paragraph 4(a)): (i) that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2001-06-05 - Case Details
appropriate. In order to prevail, therefore, the Complainant must prove the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2002-12-11 - Case Details
might be linked to the management buy-out of parts of Royal Doulton by the Complainant. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2003-03-19 - Case Details
Policy requires the complainant to prove each of the following: i) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to...
2001-08-13 - Case Details
requirements set forth in �4.a. of the Policy. First, there is no question that the domain names in dispute are confusingly similar to Complainant's MICRON and...
2001-06-15 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights...
2001-07-13 - Case Details