is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-10-24 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or...
2001-08-29 - Case Details
requirements according to the Policy, Paragraph 4 a): 6.2.1 Domain name identical or confusingly similar to the trademark (a) The identity between the trademarks...
2001-10-19 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service in which the Complainant has rights; (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to...
2001-09-28 - Case Details
Complainant must show that each of the conditions of paragraph 4 (a) of the Policy is satisfied, namely that: (i) the Domain Names are identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Names, and (iii...
2001-11-15 - Case Details
reasonable costs. B. Respondent 5.5. The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly...Similar 6.1. The relevant part of the domain name is “lcia”. By virtue of the Complainant’s long and substantial use of the initials LCIA, LCIA has become...
2005-04-11 - Case Details
level domain, and because Respondent is himself an Iranian national. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that...
2005-02-25 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar Complainant has documented that it is the owner of registered trademarks for MUGLER, and the Panel thus finds that Complainant’s trade mark...
2005-02-08 - Case Details
allegation that respondent intended or intends to attract users from Complainant’s site. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2005-01-07 - Case Details
forth in Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: - The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2002-08-05 - Case Details
the suffixes as the ICANN precedents urge us to do, I find the four accused domain names to be confusingly similar or identical to the marks which...
2002-10-28 - Case Details
the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (b) the Respondent has no rights...
2000-11-02 - Case Details
Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it owns...
2013-03-07 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in its name and trademark BIRCHBOX dating from prior to the...
2013-02-25 - Case Details
Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which it has rights. The Complainant acknowledges that the...The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no...
2013-01-18 - Case Details
Complaint or its contentions 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name contains the entirety of the...
2012-12-21 - Case Details
that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its registered XENICAL trademark, that Respondent lacks rights or a legitimate interest in the...
2012-02-15 - Case Details
purposes of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2014-07-11 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it has developed a very substantial business and web presence under its MYPROTEIN brand and its...
2014-02-18 - Case Details
filing, and even if it had been considered, it would have made no difference to the outcome of this case. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2013-11-26 - Case Details