2012, all for the word mark SHELLAC and registered for similar goods and services. The second Complainant licenses the first Complainant’s use of the...constitutes bad faith. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainants’ contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly...
2021-12-15 - Case Details
made no objections to the Complainant’s contentions. The Panel finds that consolidation is fair and equitable. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...respect to the ability to control the disputed domain name(s), (x) any (prior) pattern of similar respondent behavior, or (xi) other arguments made by the...
2020-12-07 - Case Details
distinguish Respondent’s use. Moreover, the disputed domain name is very similar to Complainant’s domain name , which was registered 11 years ago in 2009. This...evidence of bad faith. B. Respondent Respondent did not respond to the Complaint and is in default. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly...
2020-10-21 - Case Details
proceedings and will consider the email of February 9, 2015 as the Respondent's response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has submitted...trademarks) similar or identical to the disputed domain name from using it. As far as bad faith is concerned, the Complainant submits that the Respondent...
2015-03-27 - Case Details
cannot correct the determinative issue. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The first element analysis under the Policy typically proceeds in two steps...Panel notes that a similar approach was adopted in CEMEX, supra. 8. Decision For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied. /Andrew D. S. Lothian...
2024-01-16 - Case Details
paragraph 1.1.1. of the IEDR Policy are to be given the same meaning as given to the words “confusingly similar” when used in Article 8 CTMR Community...in dispute is identical to a number of its trade marks and is misleadingly similar to the remaining registrations. In this regard the Complainant...
2008-07-25 - Case Details
elements is satisfied: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...Country Walk , WIPO Case No. D2002-0487 ). A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name entirely incorporates the Complainant’s trademark...
2013-11-27 - Case Details
website where the consumer can view and purchase the Respondent’s fibre product service.” 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In...mark EFIBRE which fall to be protected under the law of passing off in Ireland. The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...
2013-10-21 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SKUNKWORKS Marks. However, on October 11, 2004 -- obviously prior to the receipt of the October 12th letter from the...The Complaint (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...
2005-02-16 - Case Details
Complainant contends that the contested domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s NCAA Marks. Specifically, the Complainant states each...confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark NCAA. The difference between each of those names and that mark is simply the inclusion of a generic descriptor...
2004-09-03 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy provides that the Complainant must establish that the disputed domain name is...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
satisfied, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii...Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or threshold) test...
2023-09-15 - Case Details
Complainant contends: 1. The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's MULTI-GYN mark. 2. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate...disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) That the respondent has...
2010-03-25 - Case Details
gTLD, at least confusingly similar to the trademark MELIA HOTELES. The Panel thus finds that the Complainants have met their burden under Policy...domain name registrations were identical or confusingly similar. See WIPO Cases D2000-0163 Raimat, S.A. , D2000-0219 Uralita, S.A. , D2000-0467 METRO...
2000-11-30 - Case Details
iv) Respondent has not only appropriated a confusingly similar mark, it has also infringed on Complainant�s identical trademark name and appropriated...Case No. FA0003000094341) [18] : Respondent�s registered domain name, comingattractions.com, is facially identical to and/or confusingly similar to...
2002-01-31 - Case Details
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, namely: - Domain Name of the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade mark/Service mark owned by...Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure Policy, the Complainant must prove that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or...
2000-11-15 - Case Details
satisfied, namely that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) the...corresponding to the domain name at issue." 7. Discussion and Findings Identical or Confusingly Similar Trade Mark 7.1 The Panel concludes unanimously that the...
2001-05-01 - Case Details
(a) The disputed domain names are identified or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s marks. (b) The disputed domain names are not in use. (c...show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2001-05-18 - Case Details
contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The domain name is . The evidence provided by the Complainant demonstrates that it is certainly entitled to claim registered trademark...
2003-07-03 - Case Details
submissions. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's registered and unregistered trademarks. Rights or...submissions. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Respondent has no basis to contest the Complainant's allegations as to registered and unregistered trade mark...
2014-06-23 - Case Details