About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 47367   document(s)s (0.188 sec)

Rows

<<  <  46301 - 46320  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1262 for sidmallya.com html (39 KB)

(i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The...personal names against parasitic registrations". A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The first requirement of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy stipulates the...

2014-10-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1469 for v64.tv, v65.tv, v75.biz, v75.mobi, v75.pw, v75.tv html (38 KB)

confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainant owns rights; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...

2013-10-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0535 for fakir.com html (40 KB)

(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and...Respondent's allegations of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.3 The Complainant has registered trade mark rights in a number...

2016-05-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1119 for airy.com html (45 KB)

in its group and are used with its permission, asserting that the Complainant’s mark should not be held to be confusingly similar to the disputed...the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has...

2020-07-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1115 for arvesta.com html (47 KB)

each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...and the Center, and of the person identified as the Respondent in the Response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The first element that the...

2020-09-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2607 for rejuve.com html (41 KB)

of domain names consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another for the purpose of profiting from the goodwill...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights or legitimate...

2020-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2925 for uax.com html (39 KB)

Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...

2020-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1256 for fossnirsystems.com html (38 KB)

the Rules set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainants must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...it considers appropriate”. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.4 The Domain Name is clearly confusingly similar to at least two marks in which the...

2008-10-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2136 for tiryaki.com html (38 KB)

Complainant since the early nineties. It acquired a business known as “Tiryaki Agro”. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trade mark...“www.tiryaki.com.tr”. The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s main trade mark and trade name “TIRYAKI” and confusingly similar to its other trade...

2015-03-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0589 for bmwenthusiastsclub.com, bmwmotorcycle.club, bmwowners.club, minienthusiastsclub.com, miniowners.club, miniownersclub.net, rollsroyceenthusiastsclub.com, rollsroyceowners.club html (41 KB)

disputed domain names are therefore confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed...declines to admit it. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant plainly has rights in the marks BMW, MINI and ROLLS-ROYCE by virtue of its...

2015-07-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1278 for cambridge.com html (40 KB)

cancelled: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The...Confusingly Similar Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, the Complainant must first of all establish rights in a trademark or service mark and secondly...

2015-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1810 for cleankeys.com html (29 KB)

following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii...the United States Patent & Trademark Office, for a stylized CLEANKEYS mark, in respect of similar goods, dating from May 1, 2008. The Complainant has...

2010-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1311 for firstgate.com html (40 KB)

succeed with a claim for transfer of a domain name, namely; - that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...necessarily earlier ("your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights"). If trademark...

2001-02-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1816 for maha.com html (27 KB)

(1) the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights in accordance with Paragraph 4 (a) (i) of the UDRP; (2...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (2) the domain name holder has no rights or legitimate interests in...

2001-03-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0154 for kcts.com html (32 KB)

law, the same as E.U. law, the mark is not confusingly similar. (g) The "dispute" in the second criterion of the Policy refers to the particular dispute...(i) the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the...

2001-04-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0192 for autosbytel.com html (33 KB)

the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Autobytel has rights; 2. Stancil Motors has no rights or legitimate...respect to the domain name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a service mark in which Autobytel has...

2001-04-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0206 for triconfort.com html (32 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...Name with no intention to use it for selling furniture or any product similar to “Triconfort”; - If “Triconfort” has forgotten to renew the Domain Name...

2005-05-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0003 for artek.com html (26 KB)

Policy have been satisfied, namely that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has rights in the various...

2013-02-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIE2012-0002 for catpumps.ie html (29 KB)

Ireland. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Under paragraph 1.3 of the IEDR Policy, “Protected Identifiers” are defined as inter alia : “1.3.1 trade and...interest in a domain name that is identical to or confusingly similar with a supplier’s trade mark. To succeed on Oki Data principles, the respondent must...

2012-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1420 for gwg.com html (28 KB)

following to justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...disputed domain name; and (iii) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...

2016-10-20 - Case Details