domain name registration and use, and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has provided evidence of a substantial number of trademark registrations for the...
2007-12-14 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or...legitimate interests with respect to the domain name; and (iii) The domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly...
2007-10-18 - Case Details
name is identical or at the very least confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks and domain names and that, the addition of the term “.ro” does...Confusingly Similar a.1. The Complainant has rights in the LAMPE BERGER mark There is no doubt that the Complainant has rights in LAMPE BERGER trademark as it...
2007-10-10 - Case Details
in order to succeed in an administrative proceeding: - that the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...(iii) of the Policy. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.5. The domain name in issue is identical to the Complainant’s German trademark DE39826729 ADAC...
2007-09-17 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) The respondent has no rights or legitimate...interest in respect of the domain name; and (iii) The domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2006-10-10 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Because the Respondent has filed no submissions, the Panel accepts the factual statements made in the Complaint...mark which is identical or confusingly similar to the disputed domain name. The Complainant’s common law mark MULTIPLAY and the disputed domain name are...
2006-09-21 - Case Details
present: (i) the Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Complainant has been using the name SUPREME RULER for over twenty years. The Google searches by the Complainant and the Panel show that...
2006-05-29 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...principles of law that it deems applicable. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the NO TIENE...
2008-09-12 - Case Details
Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainant must prove that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark...(iii) The Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant claims common...
2008-09-04 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no rights or...Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires Complainant to demonstrate rights in a trademark or service mark. Complainant has not alleged or...
2008-07-30 - Case Details
Complainant must demonstrate each of the following: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.” A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2008-07-24 - Case Details
meaning of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, that: i. The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...elements is present. The Panel will therefore deal with each of these requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the...
2008-06-25 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...principles of law that it deems applicable.” A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights under the Policy in its registered ATLANTIK mark...
2008-06-24 - Case Details
in this proceeding: (1) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (2...the panel may draw such inferences as it considers appropriate. Policy, paragraph 14(b). B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Respondent’s domain name...
2008-06-24 - Case Details
the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...compelling reason for suspending the UDRP administrative proceeding and therefore denies the Respondent’s request. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2008-04-11 - Case Details
cancelled or transferred: (1) the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to trademarks in which the Complainant has rights...
2008-03-14 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) That the Respondent has no rights or...rules and principles of law that it deems applicable. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has provided information for the registration and...
2008-03-05 - Case Details
Complainants must prove that each of the following three elements is present: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants...being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainants’ highly distinctive CHIVAS REGAL...
2008-02-12 - Case Details
the Rules set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...considers appropriate”. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.5 This aspect of this case is very straight forward. The Panel accepts that the Domain Name is...
2008-02-12 - Case Details
- that the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - that the...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Second Complainant has established rights in the ESSENTIALE trademark. It is the registered proprietor of that trademark...
2007-03-28 - Case Details