onus of proving that: (i) the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it has rights in the trademark BENETTON...
2007-02-27 - Case Details
Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Based upon the...Complainant, unopposed by Respondent, the Panel finds that the domain name is identical and confusingly similar to Complainant’s widely known mark ORLANDI...
2007-02-14 - Case Details
the three elements in paragraph�4(a) of the Policy: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s...
2007-02-01 - Case Details
cancelled or transferred: (i) The domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it is the owner of various trademarks in...
2006-11-24 - Case Details
Complaint must prove each of the following: (i) the domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark or service mark...a)(ii) above. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The only difference between the Domain Name and the Complainant’s trademark “LATIN TELECOM” is the...
2005-06-30 - Case Details
Respondent’s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has...Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant’s trademarks BEIERSDORF and NIVEA are registered in a great number of countries world wide - among them Romania...
2005-06-28 - Case Details
and was done merely to frustrate these administrative proceedings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the registered owner of the...cardiovascular diseases and disorders”. The domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark TOPROL-XL. In the view of this Panel, the...
2005-06-01 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As noted above...
2005-05-19 - Case Details
is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests...in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2006-02-06 - Case Details
the Complainant must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...faith and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is not in dispute that the Domain Name is identical to the Complainant’s...
2006-01-30 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and B. The Respondent has no rights or...requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the domain name is identical to the asserted trademark ABOVE ALL ADVERTISING...
2007-07-20 - Case Details
essentially identical and confusingly similar to Complainant’s ETS, TOEFL and GRE trademarks because they incorporate those trademarks in their entirety...paragraph 4(a) of the Policy to determine whether Complainant has complied with such requirements. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar This Panel concurs with...
2007-07-10 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided the Panel with evidence of ownership of many trademark registrations all over the world consisting of or...determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar”; Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. v. Peter Ojo , WIPO Case No. D2000-1770 “the accused domain name is...
2007-07-05 - Case Details
(1) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (2) the Respondent has...appropriate. Policy, paragraph�14(b). B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant’s four United States trademark registrations, three of which are...
2007-07-03 - Case Details
learned panelist found the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark MERCK and that the Respondent has no rights or...Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to its MERCK trademark and that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the...
2007-06-20 - Case Details
the Policy, in order to succeed in this proceeding, the Complainant must prove (i) that the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a mark...Names have been registered and are being used in bad faith. Each of these requirements will be considered in turn: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to...
2007-06-14 - Case Details
prove each of the following in order to succeed in an administrative proceeding: — that the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar...be present shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith. 6.4 Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.4.1 As to proof of the...
2007-06-08 - Case Details
Paragraph�4(a) of the Policy, that: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...The Panel will therefore deal with each of these requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name...
2007-05-09 - Case Details
Complainant must demonstrate each of the following: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...Complainant has not done so. Accordingly, the Panel accepts the late-filed Response as part of the record in this proceeding. B. Identical or Confusingly...
2010-07-28 - Case Details
Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...concludes as follows: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the MONSTER ENERGY marks acquired through...
2021-02-10 - Case Details