therefore confusingly similar, to Complainant�s respective GLOBO FM mark, in appearance, pronunciation and sound. That the addition of ".com" to the domain...of the following elements: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2001-03-29 - Case Details
address of steeveforum@email.com after being contacted by Complainant. The use of a domain name identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademarks...Complainant, under Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, is to show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2002-02-20 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...and/or confusingly similar to the said trademark and service mark " SADE " in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant submits that the...
2000-10-07 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s said registered service mark . With regard to the Respondent�s rights or legitimate interest in the said...registered the domain names and which are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark and service mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the...
2001-01-04 - Case Details
the complainant must prove each of the following: - The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. Accordingly, the Complainant has...
2002-09-30 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has...“Respondent” used in the rest of this decision should be understood accordingly. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.4 The Complainant is clearly the owner of...
2013-07-30 - Case Details
provider, in compliance with the Rules, that: “(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...admit the Supplemental Filings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds the disputed domain name , disregarding the gTLD “.com”, to be...
2018-04-16 - Case Details
Namely, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant...Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.28 The Panel accepts that the Complainant is the owner of various registered trade marks including the registered word...
2019-11-20 - Case Details
complainant has the burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...applicable”. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies upon claimed rights in her personal name, Scarlett Johansson. There is no registered...
2008-12-23 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark...”. 7.4 The Panel will consider each of these requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.5 This primary trade mark that the Complainant...
2008-12-22 - Case Details
the extent necessary. A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the Complainant asserts that, as a consequence of its continuous prior...Confusingly Similar The Respondent counters the Complainant’s contention by asserting that, for principally two reasons, the Complainant has no common law...
2007-04-11 - Case Details
incorporates the Complainant's PICK ‘N PAY mark. In the circumstances it contends that the Domain Name is identical, alternatively, confusingly similar, to the...identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no...
2009-06-24 - Case Details
confusingly similar. At no time has Corinthians licensed or otherwise permitted Respondents to use any of their marks or to apply for or use any domain names...finds that the domain name "corinthians.com" is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademarks. 6.3 Rights and Legitimate Interests in...
2000-07-20 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant 6.1 The Complainant contends as follows: Identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights 6.2 The Complainant...set out in the Rules. A . Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.3 Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, the Complainant must show that the Domain Name is...
2005-12-21 - Case Details
Paragraph 4.(a) are met because: 1. the three domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Mills has rights; 2. Mills has no...MILLS service mark, and why is confusingly similar to the mark. Mills cites WIPO Case No D2000-0038, Case No. AF-0145 [sic], WIPO Case No. D2000-0452...
2001-03-28 - Case Details
Qatar” and the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to those terms; that the Respondent lacks any legitimate interests in those terms...Disputed Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no...
2019-11-14 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...submission. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.17 This issue is straightforward. The Domain Name can only sensibly be understood as the name “Christina Dior...
2009-03-18 - Case Details
confusingly similar to those marks. 5.2 The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name contending that...Complainant has the burden of proof of showing the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2010-10-18 - Case Details
contends that the domain name in issue is confusingly similar to Complainant�s trade name CREOSCITEX and marks CREO, CREOSCITEX and SCITEX, and is identical...issue was confusingly similar to the complainant�s trademark registration, that the respondent had no right or legitimate interest in the domain name, and...
2001-01-26 - Case Details
proprietor of the mark METRO in numerous countries, and therefore has rights in that mark. The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to that mark. 2...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (2) That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2008-02-21 - Case Details