is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2022-08-26 - Case Details
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no...faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to a Trademark or Service Mark in which the Complainant has Rights; Bad Faith The first element of paragraph 4...
2022-06-02 - Case Details
confusingly similar. The Complainants are asserting rights individually in twenty-four (24) trademarks, and have provided evidence of valid and subsisting...pattern of registering domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainants have established rights through...
2011-01-05 - Case Details
each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is common ground that the Complainant has rights in...
2010-03-11 - Case Details
are that: (i) respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and (ii...faith. Each of the aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has...
2010-01-14 - Case Details
Complaint. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has demonstrated its rights in the trademark INTELLOGY by virtue of its federal registration...Discussion and Findings Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant has the burden of proving that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly...
2009-12-09 - Case Details
and use, and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has alleged rights in the trademark and service mark CULTURA PROFÉTICA. Complainant's evidence of rights includes...
2009-07-10 - Case Details
panel finds that it is both identical and confusingly similar to that trademark. The Complainant has established this element. Illegitimacy Paragraph 4(c...rejected), instead replying with another threatening letter. There are numerous other similar marks in use or pending as trademarks and domain names. The...
2000-12-29 - Case Details
is also identical to BELLSOUTH. The three domain names are, while not identical, at least confusingly similar to Complainants� marks MOVICOM and...settlement was reached. The registration of domain names identical or confusingly similar to the marks of two well known companies doing business in Argentina...
2000-10-11 - Case Details
requires that the Complainant must prove each of the following: - The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark; and - The Respondent...interest as described in paragraph 4(a)(ii) referred to above. Domain Name Identical to or Confusingly Similar Given that the particle "com" is an attribute...
2002-01-11 - Case Details
elements are present: (1) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (2) the...Panel finds that POMELLATO.COM is identical and confusingly similar with the Complainant�s trademark POMELLATO. The Complainant states that the domain...
2000-07-12 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant...confusingly similar. Having regard to the different fields of activity in which the parties are engaged, it does not follow that there would be confusion in...
2000-08-24 - Case Details
and that the said domain name "flos.com" is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's said trademark. Moreover the Complainant argues that...Findings Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy places on the Complainant the onus of proving that: (i) the said domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly...
2000-12-18 - Case Details
following elements: (i) that the Domain Names registered by the Respondent are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...addition "-net.com" this Panel finds that Respondent�s Domain Names are confusingly similar to the TELECOM PERSONAL trademark, to which Complainant has...
2001-04-10 - Case Details
the Complainant must prove each of the following: (1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...Panel has accepted and considered that submission as well. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainants nowhere allege that anyone other than...
2003-03-07 - Case Details
prove each of the following: (i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in...Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. 6.1. Domain name identical or confusingly similar The Complainant has provided ample and...
2003-04-09 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) you have no rights or legitimate interests in...relevant part of the domain name in issue is and that is clearly identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants� registered trademarks TRUWORTHS. The...
2001-08-21 - Case Details
a complainant must prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...Policy and not on the constitutional provisions of a Respondent�s country of origin. The Panel there held that the name was not confusingly similar to the...
2001-08-29 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...to be present shall, be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.6 The Complainant...
2005-01-19 - Case Details
be confusingly similar to the trademark TULLOCH in which the Complainant had rights. The Complainants in that case were both wholly-owned subsidiaries...paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, is to show: - that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2002-10-15 - Case Details