About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 47367   document(s)s (0.223 sec)

Rows

<<  <  46821 - 46840  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1407 for www-ctv.com html (37 KB)

involving the Internet or the World Wide Web. The Complainant alleges that the Respondent�s domain name www-ctv.com is ...confusingly similar to the...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights? In this instance, the Respondent has inserted "www-" in front of the...

2000-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2437 for urbanhome.com html (45 KB)

are that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and (ii...used in bad faith. Each of the aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...

2013-03-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0773 for invar.com html (37 KB)

satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the...used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Clearly the registered trademarks for the word mark INVAR cited by the Complainant, as noted in...

2012-06-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0975 for wwf.com html (45 KB)

period.   7. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed Domain Name is identical to numerous trademarks for the letters WWF...owned by the Complainant in the United States and in many other countries. It is also confusingly similar to those marks which have the letters WWF plus...

2006-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0101 for datadirection.info, datadirection.org html (37 KB)

to whether the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights, the Respondent...Identical or Confusingly Similar With regard to the first element of the test in paragraph 4 of the Policy, the Complainant claims that the domain names in...

2005-05-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1894 for clickbetter.com, clickbetter.info html (38 KB)

domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights...the time of filing the Complaint both disputed domain names were redirected to a third party website where services similar to those of the Complainant...

2021-10-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0664 for sentinelfordogs.com html (15 KB)

goods bearing the trademark. It was contended that this was precisely the type of use here. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...

2010-07-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0109 for gate-way.com html (14 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...

2000-04-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0936 for koestritzer.com html (18 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...

2002-01-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-1013 for cytospin.com html (19 KB)

the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent...

2001-12-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0939 for jllargentina.net html (17 KB)

Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's JLL marks. According to the...

2018-07-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2020-0005 for quora.com.au html (16 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns various trade mark registrations around the world for its QUORA mark, including Australian trade mark...

2020-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DRO2019-0003 for chatroulette.ro html (16 KB)

contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has shown that it has registered rights in the Trade Marks. The...

2019-05-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-1338 for hinanobeer.com html (16 KB)

Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In the Panel’s view there is no doubt that this requirement has been met, in that the dominant word...

2006-03-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DGE2021-0005 for aliexpress.ge html (16 KB)

that an applicable Court may deem appropriate or necessary in furtherance of a proceeding in that forum. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...

2022-02-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1020 for deezer.world html (16 KB)

Respondent offered the disputed domain name for sale. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has proved its rights in...

2021-06-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0329 for sonepar.store pdf (146 KB)

Complainant’s rights. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...

2023-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2022-0024 for leroymerlin-groupe.eu pdf (151 KB)

(EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly...similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law. The...

2022-10-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2022-0022 for belfius-inloggen.eu pdf (323 KB)

No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to...

2022-09-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2022-0019 for leroymerlin-groups.eu pdf (175 KB)

874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2022-09-28 - Case Details