Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized...
2022-06-02 - Case Details
874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)- (iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns registrations to trademarks that consist of the text GOPPION CAFFE and a design. According to...
2022-06-21 - Case Details
has not taken the effort of filing a detailed response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions...
2023-08-02 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has shown that it has rights in the CARPETVISTA trademark, which is reproduced in its entirety in the disputed domain names...
2023-09-14 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or...
2023-09-13 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established...
2023-05-09 - Case Details
Respondent’s supplemental filing or the request for additional time in which to file one. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Domain...
2023-05-08 - Case Details
version 3.0”), section 1.10: “A domain name which contains a common or obvious misspelling of a trademark normally will be found to be confusingly similar...
2023-06-27 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainants holds valid trademark rights for the STIHL trademark, which satisfies the initial requirement under the first element that...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name...
2023-06-20 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered...
2023-09-22 - Case Details
that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...
2023-10-11 - Case Details
Response the Panelist has exercised its discretion and decided not to admit this Supplemental Filing. Identical or confusingly similar Based on the evidence...
2009-05-18 - Case Details
Complainant to demonstrate that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2009-03-17 - Case Details
that the proceeding should continue and a decision issued within the given term. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In the...
2009-02-27 - Case Details
the case on the basis of the most complete available record. B. Identical of Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the LOUENHIDE...
2011-11-14 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it owns trade mark rights for the...
2011-08-16 - Case Details
desist letter from the Complainant at any time. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is found to be...
2010-03-19 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has no rights or...confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2010-03-15 - Case Details