874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2022-09-28 - Case Details
Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-02-17 - Case Details
the name on the prior registrant’s email address is “Boosting Inc”, the same as the name on the Respondent’s email address. B. Identical or Confusingly...Similar The Complainant owns trademark registrations for the term DURACAR. The disputed domain name solely consists of the term “duracar”, and is therefore...
2023-01-04 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its CONTIKI trade mark...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...
2023-10-11 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered...
2023-09-22 - Case Details
B11(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-12-27 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member...
2023-12-21 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in...
2023-11-16 - Case Details
older unregistered distinctive signs against confusingly similar signs. This protection is based on priority of use. The Claimant submitted invoices from...
2023-11-09 - Case Details
each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant...
2024-01-10 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized...
2022-06-02 - Case Details
874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)- (iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns registrations to trademarks that consist of the text GOPPION CAFFE and a design. According to...
2022-06-21 - Case Details
(i) Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii...
2001-06-12 - Case Details
Response the Panelist has exercised its discretion and decided not to admit this Supplemental Filing. Identical or confusingly similar Based on the evidence...
2009-05-18 - Case Details
Complainant to demonstrate that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2009-03-17 - Case Details
that the proceeding should continue and a decision issued within the given term. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In the...
2009-02-27 - Case Details
That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) That the...in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any Rules and principles of law that it deems applicable. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2009-02-10 - Case Details
분쟁도메인이름이 규정에서 요구하는 바와 같이 신청인보유상표와 혼동할 정도로 유사(confusingly similar)하다고 판단된다. 도메인이름에 관한 피신청인의 권리 또는 정당한 이익 피신청인이 분쟁도메인이름에 대해서 어떠한 권리나 정당한 이익을 가지고 있다고 볼만한 설득력있는...
2001-05-14 - Case Details