identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark inwhich the Complainant has rights; 2) Respondent has no rights or legitimateinterests in the...
2001-07-09 - Case Details
of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2001-04-24 - Case Details
following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...
2001-03-30 - Case Details
paragraph 4 (a) of the Policy, the Panel should be satisfied that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2001-04-11 - Case Details
of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2001-06-07 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, 2) that the Respondent has no legitimate interests in respects of...
2001-05-25 - Case Details
No. D2003-0796 , se señalaba: “Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires, as one element to be proved, that the domain name be identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights. These words do not require that Complainant be the owner of the mark and would...
2009-09-16 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it owns trade mark rights for the...
2011-08-16 - Case Details
the Respondent’s failure to reply. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has a trademark registration for the mark BRADESCO No. 007170424...
2010-11-23 - Case Details
of ECCO domain names in which it owns rights. The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to its ECCO trade mark and...
2010-11-22 - Case Details
globally comprehensive trademark.” 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant is the registered owner of two European...
2010-11-02 - Case Details
Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no...
2001-06-21 - Case Details
contends the following: - The domain name [s] [is/are] identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2001-08-03 - Case Details
Policy directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following: (1) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service in which the Complainant has rights; (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to the...
2001-08-08 - Case Details
the word SCORPIONS 5.2.2 Identical or Confusingly Similar Subject to the forging, the Response does not deny that the domain name is identical to the...name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and the Respondent has no rights or...
2001-12-10 - Case Details
a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the Respondent�s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2001-08-10 - Case Details
of the Rules, The Administrative Panel decides : (a) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondant is identical or anyway confusingly similar to...
2001-08-27 - Case Details
Arbitration Findings In NAF 96532 the Panel refused the Complaint because: (a) the Complainant�s and the Respondent�s marks were not identical or confusingly...similar; (b) the Respondent had a legitimate right and interest in the use of the name, Furrytails, as he had waited until after the expiry on the non...
2001-09-21 - Case Details
application paragraph 4(a) of the Policy places on the Complainant the onus of proving that: (i) the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar...
2001-10-15 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights? The Administrative Panel finds that the mark "Mbassy" has been developed...
2001-10-08 - Case Details