confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark to which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect...name or any similar name nor has it ever done so. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has not yet provided it with a plausible reason as to why...
2000-08-24 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...Informer Associates Inc (Case No 2000-0852). The present situation is similar to that in Educational Tertiary Service v TOEFL (WIPO Case D2000-0044) where...
2000-09-20 - Case Details
Conclusions The Panel finds that Mr. Robertson owns a domain name (talk-city.com) identical or confusingly similar to Talk City�s trademark (TALK CITY), has no...contained in the e-mail. Although the Panel is granted discretion to consider late responses, it is not granted similar discretion to waive the Rule 5(b)(viii...
2000-03-03 - Case Details
Contentions 5.1 Complainant contends that: a) The domain name "embraco.com" is identical, and therefore confusingly similar to the trademark EMBRACO, because..."embraco" or with any other word or phrase similar to or including "embraco". On March 23, 1998, Complainant sent a letter notifying Respondent of the...
2000-12-20 - Case Details
demonstrating three elements. 6.1 That the Complainant has rights in a trade or service mark with which the Respondent�s Domain Name is identical or confusingly...similar As noted in paragraph 4.1 above, the Complainant is the owner of registered trade and service marks comprising the name PORTMANS in four countries...
2001-01-24 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights or...registered names in order to advertise or market similar goods or services. As a line of business, keeping and maintaining a domain name register does not...
2001-02-01 - Case Details
Policy, the Complainant must prove that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant...appears to be that because the presiding panelist has participated in a decision on similar facts to the facts in this case, he should be precluded from...
2002-06-17 - Case Details
name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which complainants have rights, and (ii...Panels have made similar findings, and it seems that a broad consensus on this issue is now emerging. See e.g. Backstreet Boys v. Zuccarini , WIPO Case No...
2001-12-11 - Case Details
of the Policy, that (i) the contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...case) but was part of a systematic pattern of the misappropriation as domain names of similar pharmaceutical marks of others. This conduct plainly falls...
2001-12-10 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The domain name at issue is to be considered identical with Complainant’s trademark, as the suffix “.com” is inherent in all domain names...trademark for POLJOT in Russia, USA or any other countries of the world, nor has the Respondent a trade name or company name similar to the disputed domain...
2004-10-22 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests...anything similar. Respondent has used the Disputed Domain Name misleadingly to divert consumers seeking information about Complainant. Bad faith...
2004-10-20 - Case Details
Respondent, and the domain name was never sold. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar . Whether Complainant has trademark rights...that are similar to those found on many pay-per-click websites. The parties engaged in email correspondence in 2004 and 2005, resumed subsequently, in an...
2008-08-27 - Case Details
considered: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is clear that Complainant had registered and/or used the trade mark/trade name MESSE FRANKFURT in relation...principles of law that it deems applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove each of the following: - Similar to a trade...
2008-05-14 - Case Details
a) of the Policy: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and...sells domain names to investigate prior ownership or to search similar domain names in the absence of knowledge or imputed knowledge of the Complainant’s...
2007-08-22 - Case Details
domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii...to me and I will be happy to transfer it to them in full and final settlement of this matter.” A similar inclination to transfer the Disputed Domain...
2007-08-08 - Case Details
name to Complainant. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. Respondent raises one serious issue under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the...v. Grantics , WIPO Case No. D2000-1269 , cited in the Complaint. The basic factual pattern is similar: complainant held exclusive rights to make a...
2011-06-08 - Case Details
administrative proceeding – Respondent’s entitlement (or not) to the disputed domain name. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar Similarity is obvious, as the...Dispute Policy in effect at the time of the dispute.” Arbitration or similar agreements are perfectly legal in Texas, 2 even in contracts of adhesion, 3 and...
2011-06-07 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar. Complainant has demonstrated rights in its BUDGE marks, and “Budge” is the dominant feature of both the disputed domain names. The addition...similar reasons Complainant has proven bad faith in registration and use. Respondent sold Complainant's branded products and thus can hardly deny awareness...
2010-04-30 - Case Details
Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it has...offering of goods or services and his clear pattern of conduct is only reinforced by his use of domain names such as which is very similar to the “ingame...
2009-11-06 - Case Details
abusive cybersquatting. To invoke the Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which...la demanda contenidos en el párrafo 4.a) de la Política son: - que el nombre de dominio sea idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear confusión, con...
2009-10-07 - Case Details