to present its position. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has provided substantial evidence of ownership of rights in the trademark and...disputed domain name to direct Internet users to a similar “link farm” provided by Trafficz.com which, in addition to various links, included the heading...
2009-09-07 - Case Details
the following section, which calls for immediate resolution of the merits. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant's...time the Complaint was filed, and we have provided that information to the Complainant. The Center would note that in past similar circumstances...
2009-05-22 - Case Details
proof in respect of the following three elements: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...this case. Such conduct deserves the limited censure available to the Panel under the Policy and the Rules, if only to deter similar conduct in future. I...
2010-08-03 - Case Details
accepted practice under the Policy) that the disputed domain names were confusingly similar to those proven trademarks. The Complainant’s successful...names. The Respondents also offer the same or similar services from the disputed domain name, . The disputed domain name, , redirects to the Respondents...
2012-02-15 - Case Details
but argues that the Respondent should not be permitted to use any form of his name that is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. This is little...Centro en Ken’s Foods Inc. v. kens.com , Caso OMPI No. D2005-0721 , al resolver un caso muy similar al presente: “The primary rule in relation to domain...
2011-08-30 - Case Details
discuss their applicability to both named Respondents. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar Respondent has conceded the operative facts upon which this...number of communes in Germany and Respondent has in fact registered other domain names incorporating other similar geographic identifiers. While Respondent...
2012-08-21 - Case Details
that the said domain name in dispute be transferred to the Complainant. The Complainant submits that said domain name is identical or confusingly similar...another submission is refused. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name is clearly identical to the Complainant's registered trademark SNR. This...
2004-05-03 - Case Details
generic top level domain intended for commercial organizations- makes it rather difficult not to hold it to be confusingly similar to said trademark. 6.4...Policy. 7. Decision The Panel has found that the domain name > is identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks of the Complainant, and that the...
2003-08-11 - Case Details
domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade marks. It is identical to the Respondent’s trade mark and its trading name...filings would have made any difference to the outcome of this case. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the mark WINRAR by...
2015-06-15 - Case Details
order to succeed in any administrative proceeding: • That the Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.16 The domain name in issue is identical with the HESCO BASTION...
2003-01-13 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, in which the Complainant has rights; (2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...transferred to the Complainant: 1) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark ("mark") in which the Complainant has...
2002-07-25 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...confusingly similar to Complainant�s mark. The mark and the name are the same, with only the addition of the .com gTLD. In the present context, addition of .com...
2002-09-24 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant carries the burden of proving: (i) That the Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...to this Case : Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Rules - domain name identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s marks The Panel has no difficulty in...
2002-01-10 - Case Details
the said Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith by the Respondent. 6.2 Identical or confusingly similar The Complainant has...hospital or anything similar. The Complainant contests the authenticity of the said alleged birth certificate. The Respondent has not submitted any evidence...
2002-03-04 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the...disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds...
2020-03-24 - Case Details
burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has clearly proved this part of the Complaint. It has established that it is the proprietor of the mark AXEGA...
2008-11-07 - Case Details
obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...any right or remedy in the event of any other default, whether or not similar, This Agreement shall not become effective until accepted and executed by...
2006-02-21 - Case Details
applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove: (i) the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name (Note 1...No. D2001-0748 and Donna Karan Studio v. Raymond Donn , WIPO Case No. D2001-0587 . A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies on...
2008-01-18 - Case Details
applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove: (i) the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name (Note 1...No. D2001-0748 and Donna Karan Studio v. Raymond Donn , WIPO Case No. D2001-0587 . A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies on...
2008-01-18 - Case Details
Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or...Confusingly Similar There is no question of Complainant's longstanding rights in the famous SUPER BOWL trademark. The only issue is “confusing similarity...
2009-04-22 - Case Details