the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights, and, (ii) that the Respondent has...confusingly Similarity: The Domain Name is identical to the Complainant's trademark "TF1.com", and virtually identical to the Complainant's trademark "TF1...
2000-09-21 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights " [emphasis added]. Nowhere does the Policy contain a restriction that...for his own web site. Further, the Respondent questions why the Complainant is now claiming "his name is more important than others with a similar name...
2002-04-29 - Case Details
only used the disputed domain name in relation to its religious websites and content. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...similar view to the panel in Validas, LLC v. SMVS Consultancy Private Limited , WIPO Case No. D2009-1413 . The majority’s view of registration in good faith...
2013-10-11 - Case Details
elements in detail. Paragraph 4(a)(i) provides: "(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...under the Policy involving similar circumstances. According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, in order to be successful the Complainant has the burden of...
2000-09-19 - Case Details
Complainant must prove the elements set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: (i) Respondent's Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...a paragraph of text in which Respondent criticized Complainant's activities. Much of this was done in a style similar to that used by Complainant on...
2004-06-08 - Case Details
relevant to the elements set out in paragraph 4 of the Policy. 7.2. Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to Complainant� Mark The domain name in...the Respondent acknowledges that the Domain Name "is similar to trade marks in which the Complainant has rights ". The Respondent goes on to assert that...
2000-10-04 - Case Details
position that the contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its registered mark as to likely confuse Internet users who may believe they...very similar to, i.e. competitive with those that the Complainant offers under its mark NET WIZARDS. The contested domain name was registered more than...
2001-04-11 - Case Details
Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and...for its MYFAMILYNAME genealogical website. Respondent has acquired no trademark or service mark rights in any name remotely similar to the disputed...
2001-12-04 - Case Details
Complainant takes the position that the contested domain names are nearly identical and confusingly similar to its marks "AOL" and "AOL.COM" as to likely...contested domain name, or were to start using the contested domain name in conjunction with goods and/or services similar to those of the Complainant. Such...
2001-06-25 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights because: (i) it owns an Australian registered trademark for the word...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights, the Respondent does not dispute that the Complainant...
2020-11-06 - Case Details
Contender, LLC's conduct. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.35 This aspect of the case is straight forward. The Complainant is the owner of a registered...similar page continues to be displayed as at the date of this Decision. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant 5.1 The Complainant refers to its Community...
2009-04-27 - Case Details
Complainant asserts that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Hebrew Mark and the English Mark in which Complainant has rights for the...trademarks, such as the apostrophe in HA�ARETZ or the Domain Name and are inconsequential; (c) The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainants...
2002-07-22 - Case Details
the Respondent will be prejudiced by the Panel's decision in regard to this issue. 6.2 Substantive Issues: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2017-05-03 - Case Details
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. The...
2016-09-09 - Case Details
without harming Complainant’s Mark. I use PPC only to recover the amount I spent. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is...
2021-10-05 - Case Details
prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2002-01-10 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...faith. 5.2 Respondent admits that the domain name at issue is identical or similar to marks in which Complainant has rights, but contends that Respondent...
2002-04-10 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The domain name in issue is identical to the Complainants registered trademark SVEA FINANS, the .com part to be disregarded. B. Rights or...domain name. To the best of the Complainants’ knowledge, the Respondent is not an owner of any trademark, service mark or equivocal with a name similar to...
2004-10-21 - Case Details
relation to the Domain Name, the Complainants must prove (i) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which one or both of them...must all be satisfied for a complaint to succeed in relation to a domain name. They will therefore be considered in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly...
2010-09-07 - Case Details
a) of the Policy. Namely, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...English. This Decision has therefore been prepared on that basis. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.6 The Complainant claims rights in the term...
2017-11-09 - Case Details