Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar . Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy has been satisfied. Complainant has two federally-registered United States...
2008-02-09 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical with a trademark in which the Complainant has rights, as the disputed domain name incorporates...
2008-01-22 - Case Details
completing the purchase on May 5, 2006. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar There is no dispute that the Domain Name is identical...
2006-08-15 - Case Details
abusive cybersquatting. To invoke the Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which...
2006-09-26 - Case Details
must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the Respondent lacks...
2006-09-26 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is, for all intents and purposes...
2007-03-21 - Case Details
of the Policy, the Complainant maintains that the disputed domain name incorporates its WHARTON mark in its entirety, and is identical or confusingly...similar to the mark. The Complainant contends that the content of the Respondent’s website as of May 10, 2007 does not evince the Respondent’s exercise of a...
2007-10-23 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration which predate by many years the date...
2011-03-09 - Case Details
thereto; this fact alone is sufficient to conclude that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's FORTUNEO trademark.” Confédération Nationale...
2010-05-14 - Case Details
grievance. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar Turning to the merits, Complainant has established the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy...
2009-04-09 - Case Details
as one element to be proved, that the domain name be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2009-02-20 - Case Details
Respondent’s geographical area in order to try and support its claim. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns a...
2012-05-04 - Case Details
of this proceeding under the Policy in favour of one of the parties. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has...
2012-04-03 - Case Details
Complainant’s Supplemental Filing or Respondent’s second Response and will take no account of them in its decision. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2012-03-16 - Case Details
the Complainant has engaged in reverse domain name hijacking. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...
2011-12-19 - Case Details
Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or...
2022-09-09 - Case Details
the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or...
2022-09-09 - Case Details
the problem of cybersquatting - that is, the registration of domain names consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another...siguientes: (i) cada nombre de dominio en disputa es idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear confusión con respecto a una marca de productos o de servicios...
2015-04-10 - Case Details
determining bad faith under paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has demonstrated longstanding trademark rights in...prior panel decisions dealing with similar fact situations. This ensures that the UDRP system operates in a fair, effective and predictable manner for all...
2010-03-05 - Case Details
domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark (“mark”) in which the Complainant has rights; and 2. the Respondent has no...Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6A.1 The Complainant has rights in the trademark MAWANA SUGARS due to its long usage of the said trademarks for...
2006-04-13 - Case Details