Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in...
2023-11-16 - Case Details
older unregistered distinctive signs against confusingly similar signs. This protection is based on priority of use. The Claimant submitted invoices from...
2023-11-09 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its CONTIKI trade mark...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
B11(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-12-27 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member...
2023-12-21 - Case Details
each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant...
2024-01-10 - Case Details
determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted...
2024-05-03 - Case Details
ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are...
2024-05-23 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has shown that it has rights in the CARPETVISTA trademark, which is reproduced in its entirety in the disputed domain names...
2023-09-14 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or...
2023-09-13 - Case Details
has not taken the effort of filing a detailed response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions...
2023-08-02 - Case Details
that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...
2023-10-11 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered...
2023-09-22 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized...
2024-03-13 - Case Details
feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes...
2024-03-07 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established...
2023-04-06 - Case Details
Complainant’s rights. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2023-03-28 - Case Details
hopes that it will forego gratuitous mudslinging or provide documentary proof to back up its allegations. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2012-11-08 - Case Details
(i) The disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service mark in which the Complainant...
2014-02-19 - Case Details
prove all three of the following elements to be entitled to the relief sought: (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2015-02-17 - Case Details