Arbitration Findings In NAF 96532 the Panel refused the Complaint because: (a) the Complainant�s and the Respondent�s marks were not identical or confusingly...similar; (b) the Respondent had a legitimate right and interest in the use of the name, Furrytails, as he had waited until after the expiry on the non...
2001-09-21 - Case Details
application paragraph 4(a) of the Policy places on the Complainant the onus of proving that: (i) the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar...
2001-10-15 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights? The Administrative Panel finds that the mark "Mbassy" has been developed...
2001-10-08 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service in which the Complainant has rights; (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to...
2001-09-28 - Case Details
분쟁도메인이름이 규정에서 요구하는 바와 같이 신청인보유상표와 혼동할 정도로 유사(confusingly similar)하다고 판단된다. 도메인이름에 관한 피신청인의 권리 또는 정당한 이익 피신청인이 분쟁도메인이름에 대해서 어떠한 권리나 정당한 이익을 가지고 있다고 볼만한 설득력있는...
2001-05-14 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark inwhich the Complainant has rights; 2) Respondent has no rights or legitimateinterests in the...
2001-07-09 - Case Details
of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2001-04-24 - Case Details
following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...
2001-03-30 - Case Details
paragraph 4 (a) of the Policy, the Panel should be satisfied that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2001-04-11 - Case Details
of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2001-06-07 - Case Details
principle on the part of the Respondent to transfer the disputed name to the Complainant. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It...
2006-03-02 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its Marks. Complainant alleges that Respondent lacks...
2006-01-04 - Case Details
proceeding through mere default of the Respondent, the Panel makes the following specific findings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The similarity between...
2005-08-17 - Case Details
reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain names and are identical to the...
2005-06-16 - Case Details
rights in a trade or service mark with which the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar (paragraph 4(a)(i)) On the face of the...
2005-05-26 - Case Details
4(a) of the Policy. These elements are as follows: (i) Respondent’s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2004-11-03 - Case Details
and confusingly similar to others, that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and that the Respondent...
2014-08-13 - Case Details
hopes that it will forego gratuitous mudslinging or provide documentary proof to back up its allegations. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2012-11-08 - Case Details
Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the...
2014-04-09 - Case Details
shield its conduct by closing it eyes to whether the domain name it is registering is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark of another. See...
2014-03-27 - Case Details