that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...
2023-10-11 - Case Details
has not taken the effort of filing a detailed response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions...
2023-08-02 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainants holds valid trademark rights for the STIHL trademark, which satisfies the initial requirement under the first element that...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name...
2023-06-20 - Case Details
(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or...
2022-11-04 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established...
2023-04-06 - Case Details
the name on the prior registrant’s email address is “Boosting Inc”, the same as the name on the Respondent’s email address. B. Identical or Confusingly...Similar The Complainant owns trademark registrations for the term DURACAR. The disputed domain name solely consists of the term “duracar”, and is therefore...
2023-01-04 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established...
2023-05-09 - Case Details
Respondent’s supplemental filing or the request for additional time in which to file one. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Domain...
2023-05-08 - Case Details
Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-02-17 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized...
2024-03-13 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its CONTIKI trade mark...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in...
2023-11-16 - Case Details
older unregistered distinctive signs against confusingly similar signs. This protection is based on priority of use. The Claimant submitted invoices from...
2023-11-09 - Case Details
feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes...
2024-03-07 - Case Details
each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant...
2024-01-10 - Case Details
B11(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-12-27 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member...
2023-12-21 - Case Details
ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are...
2024-05-23 - Case Details
attached to his name. Identical or confusingly similar (Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), Rules paragraphs 3(b(viii), (ix)(1)) 6.12 The Complainant contends that...of the Policy as follows: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2004-03-31 - Case Details