About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.162 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50941 - 50960  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2024-0023 for iptiq.eu pdf (170 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and/or...

2024-08-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2020-0009 for rochas.eu html (20 KB)

disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a...

2020-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1183 for karolinskainstitutet.org html (13 KB)

Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark rights in the KAROLINSKA...

2020-06-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2020-0063 for onatera.co html (13 KB)

Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Once the ccTLD “.co” is ignored (which is appropriate in this case), the disputed domain name consists of the...

2020-12-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DME2020-0007 for hugoboss.me html (17 KB)

independent research under the general powers of the Panel articulated, inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...

2020-11-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2020-0006 for threebestrated.com.au html (17 KB)

not to admit them to the record. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns Australian combined word and logo mark registration no...

2020-05-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2024-0028 for delphin-fishing.eu pdf (161 KB)

finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...

2024-11-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0545 for missoni.net html (13 KB)

Complaint to be granted, the Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly...similar to the trade marks or service marks in which the Complainant has rights; and, (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or no legitimate interests in...

2002-08-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0600 for proteinchip.com html (17 KB)

of the Policy. These elements are as follows: (i) Respondent's Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...

2002-09-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0767 for haysexecutive.com html (14 KB)

Dispute Resolution Policy lists three tests which a Complainants must satisfy in order to succeed: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar...

2002-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0262 for frappuccino.com, starbuckscoffee.com html (16 KB)

are not barred by its alleged delay in taking action. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain names are identical to trademarks in which...

2003-07-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0269 for nkids.com html (13 KB)

Complainants� contentions.   6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainants claim rights in N KIDS. To show that they are the...

2003-06-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0388 for alcan.org html (16 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...

2003-08-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0863 for sialgeo.com html (15 KB)

Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel decides that the domain name is identical to the trademark SIALGEO. B. Rights or...

2003-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0820 for urlaub.info html (15 KB)

paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is satisfied, namely that (i) The Domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...

2002-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0838 for momo.com html (15 KB)

(i) That the Respondent�s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) That...

2002-11-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0901 for snoopy.biz html (12 KB)

Complainant to prove each of the three elements set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, as follows: (i)the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2002-11-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0906 for votorantim.com html (13 KB)

that on the balance of probabilities:- 7.2 The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s registered trade marks. 7.3 The...

2002-12-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-1000 for shoosmiths.com html (12 KB)

  6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As set forth above, the Complainant�s law firm has been known as Shoosmiths or...

2003-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-1102 for goldlinegroup.com html (50 KB)

Complaint. The Domain Name is Confusingly Similar to Complainant�s Trade-Marks. The domain name is confusingly similar, if not identical, to the Complainant�s...contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...

2003-02-03 - Case Details