is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar For...
2021-10-04 - Case Details
use and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant seeks to establish unregistered or common law rights in the trademark MCGRAW based on its use in connection with...
2022-03-14 - Case Details
Names are identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...Identical or Confusingly Similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights The difficulty the Complaint faces is that it does not have any relevant...
2022-08-12 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant indisputably has rights in the LENDSCAPE mark, both by virtue of its trademark registrations and as a result of its...Preliminary issue: Complainant’s Unsolicited Supplemental Filing and Panel Procedural Order No. 1 B. Identical or Confusingly Similar C. Rights or Legitimate...
2022-12-13 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or...Background 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant B. Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate...
2024-05-08 - Case Details
transfer of the disputed domain names: (i) each of the disputed domain names is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...registered and is using the disputed domain names in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it has unregistered trademark...
2020-11-17 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the domain name; and 3) that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2002-05-29 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) are present: (i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...allowed to use Domain Names which are identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks owned by the Complainant. The Complainant disputes this. While the...
2002-05-27 - Case Details
of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...and used in bad faith. Identity or confusingly similarity to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights The domain name "domina.net...
2000-08-01 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that the domain name is, for allintents and purposes, identical to the EUROCHANNEL mark. The addition of...thetop level domain designation “.com” is of no legal significancein determining whether a mark and domain name are identical or confusingly similar.See...
2005-06-10 - Case Details
the problem of cybersquatting - that is, the registration of domain names consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another...reproduce en su totalidad la marca POLAREA del Promovente. El nombre de dominio en disputa es idéntico al signo distintivo POLAREA y similar en grado de...
2014-07-28 - Case Details
Name is identical to its PURVA mark and confusingly similar to its PURAVANKARA and PURVANKARA marks. The Complainant contends that it is inconceivable...must prove each of the following, namely that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...
2013-04-10 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...decision. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.24 One of the Complainants is clearly the owner of a number of trade marks that comprise the words “Park...
2014-02-21 - Case Details
“foodcube”, and the Complainant's business is confusingly similar to that operated by the proprietor of the website at “www.foodcube.com.au.” 7. The...(i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) That...
2009-09-22 - Case Details
within the meaning of paragraph 4 of the Policy, the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark ISCRUB, that...the Policy, that: A. The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and B. The...
2007-10-24 - Case Details
The Complainant contends: 1. The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...of the Policy, a complainant has the burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2011-06-23 - Case Details
4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...or Confusingly Similar 6.7 This aspect of the case is very straight forward. The Complainant is clearly the owner of various registered trade mark...
2009-04-08 - Case Details
abuse of the sort disallowed by the Policy. 7. Decision The Panel has found that both domain names at issue are confusingly similar to Complainant�s...similar to the extent of creating confusion in respect of the trademarks or service marks on which the complainant holds rights; that Respondent has no...
2001-03-09 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is known by the corporate name, trade name and trademark WIPRO since...
2018-10-29 - Case Details
be conducted in English B. Identical or Confusingly Similar According to section 1.11.1 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP...
2021-02-18 - Case Details