About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.191 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50981 - 51000  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1762 for enpower.net html (28 KB)

the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has established trademark rights in the term ENPOWER and that the disputed domain name is identical...

2011-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0990 for promat.com html (29 KB)

in the case at hand, the Panel opts not to consider the Supplemental filing of the Complainant. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...the domain name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar”; Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. v. Peter Ojo , WIPO Case No...

2010-11-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0085 for tribalwars.com html (31 KB)

following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii...documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any Rules and principles of law that it deems applicable”. B. Identical or Confusingly...

2011-04-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2015-0026 for topshop.com.au html (34 KB)

Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The only relevant consideration for the purposes of the first limb of the Policy is whether...the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to a trade mark in respect of which the Complainant has rights. The date of registration or...

2015-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2496 for giordana.com html (31 KB)

representing the respondent in the prior UDRP proceeding. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered trademark...concerns a new Respondent and that these proceedings do not constitute a refiled case. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has evidenced to the...

2017-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1686 for bruyerre.com html (33 KB)

(i) The domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights...being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has rights in the Trademark. A comparison between...

2016-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0033 for myknot.com html (30 KB)

Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; the Respondent has no rights or...relation to trademark rights in THE KNOT. The Panel found the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark THE KNOT and the...

2008-03-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1652 for theeconomist.com html (28 KB)

paragraph 4(a) of the Policy to establish: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith by the Respondent. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the...

2008-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0662 for 5wl.com, 6wl.com, rigidized.biz html (29 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...they are neither controlling nor binding on this Administrative Panel. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is common-ground that the subject domain...

2006-08-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0916 for waynerooney.com html (34 KB)

to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainants must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...The Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar There is no dispute that the...

2006-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0242 for mariabartiromo.com html (29 KB)

response was received.   5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the Complainant asserts that, as a consequence of...the Complainant’s undisputed representations. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the...

2007-04-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2089 for markguagliardo.com html (30 KB)

decision that a domain name should be either cancelled or transferred: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...Case No. D2000-0270 . B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel initially addresses whether the Complainant has established trademark rights in MARK...

2018-01-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2174 for viking.com html (30 KB)

justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As is apparent from the evidence submitted by...

2018-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0943 for petplan.law html (30 KB)

the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has...or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence and has thus established its rights in the PETPLAN trademark, as described in section 4...

2018-07-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0535 for proeza.com html (33 KB)

lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that Complainant has...

2018-06-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2236 for vdg.com html (31 KB)

justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence and has thus...

2019-02-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0302 for zohoor.com html (32 KB)

that a complainant must prove each of the following elements: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...the three elements apply cumulatively, a failure to satisfy any one element will result in the Complaint being denied. A. Identical or Confusingly...

2021-05-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2651 for auconet.com html (34 KB)

confusingly similar to the Trademark. In fact, the Disputed Domain Name fully includes its verbal element, and the trademark is recognizable in the Disputed...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...

2021-03-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3037 for gs1.online html (30 KB)

must prove each of the following elements: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Based on the evidence provided, the Panel finds that the...

2021-01-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIR2021-0014 for gilead.ir html (37 KB)

UDRP, the Panel will refer to prior UDRP cases and doctrine where appropriate. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has rights in the GILEAD...relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of...

2021-10-28 - Case Details