About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.204 sec)

Rows

<<  <  51081 - 51100  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-1156 for laurabranigan.com html (43 KB)

obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...any right or remedy in the event of any other default, whether or not similar, This Agreement shall not become effective until accepted and executed by...

2006-02-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0398 for winrar.com html (43 KB)

domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade marks. It is identical to the Respondent’s trade mark and its trading name...filings would have made any difference to the outcome of this case. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the mark WINRAR by...

2015-06-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0121 for hotel4superbowl.com, hotels4superbowl.com, super-bowl-final-four-tickets.com, superbowl-hotel-rooms.com, superbowl-hotels.com, superbowl-room.com, superbowl-rooms.com, superbowl56.com, superbowl57.com, superbowl58.com, superbowl59.com, superbowl60.com, superbowl61.com ... html (45 KB)

Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or...Confusingly Similar There is no question of Complainant's longstanding rights in the famous SUPER BOWL trademark. The only issue is “confusing similarity...

2009-04-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2007-0008 for bartender.com.au html (42 KB)

applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove: (i) the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name (Note 1...No. D2001-0748 and Donna Karan Studio v. Raymond Donn , WIPO Case No. D2001-0587 . A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies on...

2008-01-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2007-0007 for barawards.com.au html (42 KB)

applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove: (i) the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name (Note 1...No. D2001-0748 and Donna Karan Studio v. Raymond Donn , WIPO Case No. D2001-0587 . A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies on...

2008-01-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1264 for axega.com html (43 KB)

burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has clearly proved this part of the Complaint. It has established that it is the proprietor of the mark AXEGA...

2008-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2024-0014 for converse.co pdf (192 KB)

consolidation request. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing...Inc. v. Narendra Ghimire Case No. DCO2024-0014 B. Identical or Confusingly Similar C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith D. Rights or Legitimate Interests ...

2024-06-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0100 for snr.com html (38 KB)

that the said domain name in dispute be transferred to the Complainant. The Complainant submits that said domain name is identical or confusingly similar...another submission is refused. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name is clearly identical to the Complainant's registered trademark SNR. This...

2004-05-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2991 for kevac.com html (39 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the...disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds...

2020-03-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0400 for milupa.com html (36 KB)

is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, in which the Complainant has rights; (2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...transferred to the Complainant: 1) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark ("mark") in which the Complainant has...

2002-07-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0530 for flamingo.com html (37 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...confusingly similar to Complainant�s mark. The mark and the name are the same, with only the addition of the .com gTLD. In the present context, addition of .com...

2002-09-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-1038 for hescobastion.com html (43 KB)

order to succeed in any administrative proceeding: • That the Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.16 The domain name in issue is identical with the HESCO BASTION...

2003-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0209 for vistobueno.com html (59 KB)

generic top level domain intended for commercial organizations- makes it rather difficult not to hold it to be confusingly similar to said trademark. 6.4...Policy.   7. Decision The Panel has found that the domain name > is identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks of the Complainant, and that the...

2003-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0141 for peterframpton.com html (50 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights " [emphasis added]. Nowhere does the Policy contain a restriction that...for his own web site. Further, the Respondent questions why the Complainant is now claiming "his name is more important than others with a similar name...

2002-04-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0028 for aluship.com html (60 KB)

Contender, LLC's conduct. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.35 This aspect of the case is straight forward. The Complainant is the owner of a registered...similar page continues to be displayed as at the date of this Decision. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant 5.1 The Complainant refers to its Community...

2009-04-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2020-0013 for bromance.com.au html (65 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights because: (i) it owns an Australian registered trademark for the word...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights, the Respondent does not dispute that the Complainant...

2020-11-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-1117 for pesola.com html (33 KB)

Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and...for its MYFAMILYNAME genealogical website. Respondent has acquired no trademark or service mark rights in any name remotely similar to the disputed...

2001-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0175 for justiceforchildren.net, justiceforchildren.org html (33 KB)

Complainant must prove the elements set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: (i) Respondent's Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...a paragraph of text in which Respondent criticized Complainant's activities. Much of this was done in a style similar to that used by Complainant on...

2004-06-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0789 for superfi.com, superfi.net html (26 KB)

elements in detail. Paragraph 4(a)(i) provides: "(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...under the Policy involving similar circumstances. According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, in order to be successful the Complainant has the burden of...

2000-09-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0948 for kosmea.com html (28 KB)

relevant to the elements set out in paragraph 4 of the Policy. 7.2. Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to Complainant� Mark The domain name in...the Respondent acknowledges that the Domain Name "is similar to trade marks in which the Complainant has rights ". The Respondent goes on to assert that...

2000-10-04 - Case Details