Complainant takes the position that the contested domain names are nearly identical and confusingly similar to its marks "AOL" and "AOL.COM" as to likely...contested domain name, or were to start using the contested domain name in conjunction with goods and/or services similar to those of the Complainant. Such...
2001-06-25 - Case Details
position that the contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its registered mark as to likely confuse Internet users who may believe they...very similar to, i.e. competitive with those that the Complainant offers under its mark NET WIZARDS. The contested domain name was registered more than...
2001-04-11 - Case Details
only used the disputed domain name in relation to its religious websites and content. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...similar view to the panel in Validas, LLC v. SMVS Consultancy Private Limited , WIPO Case No. D2009-1413 . The majority’s view of registration in good faith...
2013-10-11 - Case Details
Complainant asserts that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Hebrew Mark and the English Mark in which Complainant has rights for the...trademarks, such as the apostrophe in HA�ARETZ or the Domain Name and are inconsequential; (c) The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainants...
2002-07-22 - Case Details
the Respondent will be prejudiced by the Panel's decision in regard to this issue. 6.2 Substantive Issues: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2017-05-03 - Case Details
prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2002-01-10 - Case Details
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. The...
2016-09-09 - Case Details
without harming Complainant’s Mark. I use PPC only to recover the amount I spent. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is...
2021-10-05 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...faith. 5.2 Respondent admits that the domain name at issue is identical or similar to marks in which Complainant has rights, but contends that Respondent...
2002-04-10 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The domain name in issue is identical to the Complainants registered trademark SVEA FINANS, the .com part to be disregarded. B. Rights or...domain name. To the best of the Complainants’ knowledge, the Respondent is not an owner of any trademark, service mark or equivocal with a name similar to...
2004-10-21 - Case Details
relation to the Domain Name, the Complainants must prove (i) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which one or both of them...must all be satisfied for a complaint to succeed in relation to a domain name. They will therefore be considered in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly...
2010-09-07 - Case Details
DANFOSS, it is nevertheless confusingly similar to the Complaint’s trade mark as the disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant’s trade mark DANFOSS...，“Consensus view: A domain name which contains a common or obvious misspelling of a trademark normally will be found to be confusingly similar to such trademark...
2012-03-28 - Case Details
the Policy, the Complainant has the burden of proof in respect of the following three elements: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar...The Panel will consider each of these requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.6 The Panel accepts that the Complainant has a number...
2010-07-19 - Case Details
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the...name holder) to retain registration and use of the disputed domain name…" A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence and...
2015-07-10 - Case Details
the Complainant has the burden of proving the following: (i) That the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...Confusingly Similar The Complainant has sufficiently proved that there are registered Benelux and international registrations of the mark CERTIPOST. The Domain...
2008-10-06 - Case Details
respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no rights or...aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has registered the word and design...
2010-06-01 - Case Details
a) of the Policy. Namely, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...English. This Decision has therefore been prepared on that basis. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.6 The Complainant claims rights in the term...
2017-11-09 - Case Details
respect of the Disputed Domain Name that: (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant asserts trademark rights in the term “vrindavan...
2018-12-18 - Case Details
been prejudiced by the fact that it has not been able to view the exhibits in English. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the...Discussion and Findings B. Identical or Confusingly Similar C. Rights or Legitimate Interests D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision ...
2024-04-08 - Case Details
day to be admitted. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The...upon Respondent’s submissions in reply to Procedural Order No. 1 6. Discussion and Findings B. Identical or Confusingly Similar C. Rights or Legitimate...
2024-10-25 - Case Details