following: (i) that the domain names registered by the Respondent are identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks or service marks in which the...
2002-03-01 - Case Details
Uniform Policy. These premises are: - the domain name registered by the respondent must be identical or confusingly similar to an earlier product or service...
2000-09-06 - Case Details
Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2. that the Respondent has no rights...
2001-01-22 - Case Details
that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2000-12-27 - Case Details
issue is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark or service mark, and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2000-08-08 - Case Details
requests that the Panel make a finding of reverse domain name hijacking. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...
2017-07-10 - Case Details
research under the general powers of the Panel articulated, inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant...
2023-04-05 - Case Details
B.Respondent There has been no valid response from the Respondent. 6. Discussion and Finding A. The domain names at issue are confusingly similar to trade...
2002-06-06 - Case Details
contends that the contested domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant's Marks inasmuch as that name includes the Complainant's mark...
2002-04-22 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN Policy, is to show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2001-11-06 - Case Details
be granted, the Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...
2001-12-14 - Case Details
identical or anyway confusingly similar to the trademarks and other rights of the Complainant La Poste, (b) that the Company L et Cie has no rights or...
2002-01-14 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2002-02-14 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN policy, as follows: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...
2002-03-18 - Case Details
the Policy, is to show: -That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2002-05-10 - Case Details
Those requirements are that: (i) Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2002-03-19 - Case Details
substantially identical or confusingly similar to "ABEBOOKS.COM" in which the Complainant has established rights in Australia and internationally well before any...
2003-11-17 - Case Details
present. 11.2 Domain Names identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s Marks The domain name in dispute is videonet.com. The Mark owned by the...
2000-07-25 - Case Details
the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, 2)that the Respondent has no...
2000-08-01 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. That the Respondent has no legitimate interests in...
2000-08-29 - Case Details