misleading and factually incorrect. Mr. J. Yopp (Vice President) along with F. Brittain and other senior executives of the Complainant met with the...Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Ron Anderson , WIPO Case No. D2004-0312 , the panel held: “… the fact that Respondent trades in automobiles (and specifically...
2011-01-26 - Case Details
transmission of its response to Procedural Order No. 3 was technically timely under the Rules. Complainant cites the language of paragraph 2(f) of the Rules...missed communication. The Panel disagrees with Complainant that paragraph 2(f) is directly applicable to the missed transmission to the Center based on a...
2011-11-16 - Case Details
Bernat F., SA v. Marrodan , WIPO Case No. D2000-0966 : “The burden of proof lies with the Complainant in all cases to establish actual bad faith by the...
2012-08-02 - Case Details
Respondents. Paragraph 4(f) of the Policy allows a panel to consolidate multiple disputes between parties at its sole discretion and paragraph 10(e) of the...
2023-11-13 - Case Details
see also, inter alia, TPI Holdings, Inc. v. Carmen Armengol, WIPO Case No. D2009-0361; and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. John Mercier, WIPO Case No. D2018...
2023-12-19 - Case Details
displaying identical images of Complainant’s products, with matching website titles and favicons (Annex 16 to the Complaint). (f) The disputed domain names...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
paragraphs 5(f), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and draw such inferences it considers appropriate pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules. The Panel is entitled...
2023-05-30 - Case Details
a formal Response, the Panel may decide this proceeding based on the Complainant’s undisputed factual allegations under paragraphs 5(f), 14(a), and 15...
2023-05-25 - Case Details
names , , and ; (f) Respondent 1 appears to have implied in one of his emails to the Center that...
2023-05-17 - Case Details
iewicz, WIPO Case No. DME2010-0008; Telecom Personal, S.A. v. NAMEZERO.COM, Inc, WIPO Case No. D2001-0015; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Macalve e-dominios...
2023-04-19 - Case Details
404444, which has been registered since 1978 in respect of milk chocolate, hot cocoa mix, candy and cookie mix; and (f) European Union Trademark (“EUTM...
2022-11-01 - Case Details
Osorio, Caso OMPI No. D2012-1110. 2 Ver Arla Foods amba v. Bel Arbor / Domain Admin, PrivacyProtect.org, Caso OMPI No. D2012-0875; Ver también F. Hoffmann...
2022-11-07 - Case Details
D2001-0015; F. Hoffmann La Roche AG v. Macalve e-dominios S.A., WIPO Case No. D2006-0451; Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case...
2022-11-28 - Case Details
Ver Arla Foods amba v. Bel Arbor / Domain Admin, PrivacyProtect.org, Caso OMPI No. D2012-0875; Ver también F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Bargin Register...
2022-12-29 - Case Details
record. Hence, under paragraphs 5(f), 14(a), and 15(a) of the Rules, the Panel decided this proceeding on the basis of Complainant’s undisputed factual...
2023-01-02 - Case Details
0015; F. Hoffmann La Roche AG v. Macalve e-dominios S.A., WIPO Case No. D2006-0451; and Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No...
2022-04-27 - Case Details
Inc., WIPO Case No. D2001-0015; F. Hoffmann La Roche AG v. Macalve e-dominios S.A., WIPO Case No. D2006-0451; Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear...
2022-07-01 - Case Details
device marks (hereinafter, the KHADI trademarks). The Complainant has annexed a list of the registered KHADI trademarks in India as Annexure F. The...
2022-06-29 - Case Details
Respondent’s use of its domain name was in connection with the bona fide offering of goods and services of Complainant”. En Enrique Bernat F., SA c. Marrodan...
2023-03-30 - Case Details
third element under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. 7. Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (“RDNH”) Paragraph 15(e) of the Rules provides that, “[i]f after...
2023-03-28 - Case Details