The Complainant is one of the most active proprietary
trading f irms in the world and a key market maker in various products listed on the stock exchanges
throughout the world. In 30 years of activity, the Complainant has grown considerably, of fering its trading
solutions primarily on the basis of data algorithms, and using its execution platform to provide liquidity to
f inancial markets globally. Today, the Complainant employs over 950 people and owns of f ices in
Amsterdam, Chicago, Hong Kong, China, New York City, Mumbai, Seoul and Sydney.
...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
Gaëlle Drevet, is the owner of the following trademarks:
- France trademark registration No. 4338335 for FRANKIE SHOP (semi-f igurative mark), f iled on February
15, 2017, and registered on June 9, 2017, in classes 03, 04, 09, 14, 16, 18 and 25;
- United States trademark registration No. 5147070 for FRANKIE SHOP (word mark), f iled on October 7,
2014, and registered on February 21, 2017, in international class 35.
...Moreover, the gTLD “.top” can be disregarded under the f irst element confusing similarity test.
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.
Therefore, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2024-02-19 - Case Details
The Respondent’s email to commit f raud
page 3
does not convey any rights or legitimate interests to the Respondent and cannot be considered a bona f ide
of fering of goods or services or legitimate noncommercial use.
...From the evidence provided by the Complainant, it appears that the Respondent sent an email in an attempt
to f raudulently deceive the Complainant’s employees by impersonating the Complainant’s Chief Legal
Of f icer. ...
2025-08-18 - Case Details
However, at least four security vendors have reported that the disputed domain name is associated with
malicious, phishing or suspicious activities, according to a report f rom VirusTotal, a service that analyzes
f iles and URLs for viruses, worms, trojans and other kinds of malicious content.
5. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section
2.1.
The Complainant is a f irm providing f inancial information services, and additional term “claims” in the
disputed domain name describes a component of certain f inancial services. ...
2025-04-28 - Case Details
Registration No. 1682729, registered April 14, 1992, f irst used in commerce, May
1990, for goods including glass optical f iber in f ilament or cable form, and f iber optic couplers; and
- CORNING, U.S. ...Although the addition of other terms, here, “hrmgtscrgroup” may bear on assessment of the second and third
elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity
between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-04-23 - Case Details
The trademark registration certificate gives the date for f irst use of the mark in commerce as October 31,
1988. The trademark registration under class 27 is described as covering “f itted carpeting for truck beds”.
...The current non-use of the disputed domain name, in the circumstances of this case, does not change
the Panel’s f inding as to the Respondent’s bad faith. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.3.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
...
2026-02-05 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 6
The other f ive disputed domain names are passively held. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel
f inds the non-use of these f ive disputed domain names does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the
circumstances of this proceeding. ...In
these circumstances, the Panel considers that the most likely intended use of these f ive disputed domain
names is the same as that of the f irst two disputed domain names, which is in bad faith.
...
2024-03-27 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant, Global Loan Agency Services Limited uses GLAS (hereinafter the “Mark”) as a trademark for
f inancial services in connection with agency, trustee, and f iduciary services.
Complainant alleges that the Mark is “used extensively in the f inancial services sector in connection with
agency, trustee and fiduciary services.” ...Having reviewed the available record, the Panel notes the
distinctiveness and reputation of Complainant’s trademark, and the composition of the Disputed Domain
Name, and f inds that in the circumstances of this case the passive holding of the Disputed Domain Name
does not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the Policy.
...
2025-08-25 - Case Details
However, as discussed in section 1.7 of
WIPO Overview 3.0, “In specific limited instances, while not a replacement as such for the typical side-by-
side comparison, where a panel would benef it f rom af f irmation as to confusing similarity with the
complainant’s mark, the broader case context such as website content trading of f the complainant’s
reputation (…) may support a f inding of confusing similarity.” ...As a result, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2025-11-27 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...UDRP panels have found that domain names
identical to a complainant’s trademark carry a high risk of implied af f iliation. WIPO Overview 3.0, section
2.5.1.
Therefore, the Panel f inds the second element of the Policy has been established.
...
2024-10-15 - Case Details
Accordingly,
the Center notif ied the Respondent’s default on May 7, 2025.
page 2
The Center appointed George R. F. Souter as the sole panelist in this matter on May 12, 2025. The Panel
f inds that it was properly constituted. ...The addition of a hyphen and the term “usa” in one of the disputed
domain names does not detract f rom this f inding.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2025-06-03 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name <f inecofx.com> is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
The disputed domain name <f inecofx.org> is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc.
3. ...The Complainant is also the owner of the domain name <f inecobank.com>, registered on June 17, 2006.
The disputed domain names <f inecofx.com> and <f inecofx.org> were registered on June 22, 2023 and
August 2, 2023, respectively. ...
2023-10-20 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was redirected
to the Complainant’s of f icial website and it is used to impersonate the Complainant in f raudulent email
correspondence with its suppliers. ...The Panel f inds this additional letter constitutes a common,
obvious or intentional misspelling of the Complainant’s marks or a typosquatting case that points to an
intention on the part of the Respondent to generate confusion or af f iliation with the Complainant, its
trademarks and its of f icial website.
...
2024-01-24 - Case Details
There are no exceptional circumstances within paragraph 5(f ) of the Rules to prevent the Panel f rom
determining the dispute based upon the Complaint, notwithstanding the failure of the Respondent to f ile a
Response. ...This finding is based on the offering of ancillary services related to the Complainant
under the name “Explore IG” (displaying a f igurative element very similar to the Complainant’s f igurative
trademark) together with pop-up ads of fers when Internet users attempt to use Respondent’s services.
...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
Le Nom de Domaine Litigieux renvoie
vers un site web f rançais similaire/quasi-identique au site of f iciel du Requérant, incluant la marque du
Requérant et proposant à la vente des produits similaires à ceux du Requérant à prix réduit en utilisant les
photos of f icielles des produits du Requérant provenant du site web de ce dernier.
5. ...Conformément aux Règles
d’application, paragraphe 11(a), en l’absence d’un contrat entre les parties, ou en l’absence d’une mention
contraire au contrat d’enregistrement, la langue de la procédure doit être la langue du contrat
d’enregistrement.
La Plainte a été déposée en f rançais. Le Requérant a demandé que la langue de la procédure soit le
f rançais pour plusieurs raisons, dont le fait que le contenu du site web associé au Nom de Domaine Litigieux
est rédigé en f rançais et destiné à un public f rancophone, et que le Requérant est une société de droit
f rançais.
...
2026-02-05 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on
August 10, 2025.
page 2
The Complainant f iled a supplemental f iling on August 11, 2025.
The Center appointed Harini Narayanswamy as the sole panelist in this matter on August 19, 2025. ...Just
mere use of a domain name prior to the notice of dispute is insuf f icient for claiming rights or legitimate
interests where circumstances indicate that the mark is used in the domain name to gain unfair benef it f rom
a complainant’s trademark. ...
2025-09-11 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms, here “residences” and “miami”, may bear on assessment of the second
and third elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing
similarity between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank or parking page) would not prevent
a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel
f inds the non-use of the disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances
of this proceeding. ...
2024-07-08 - Case Details
The emails from the Respondent were disguised as an email f rom an employee of the
Complainant, and the Complainant’s postal code, telephone number, and logo were used in the signature
block in order to deceive the recipient into believing that the email actually came f rom the Complainant.
...Further, considering the use of the disputed domain name in perpetuating f raud, it is quite clear that the
Respondent registered the disputed domain name with knowledge of the Complainant’s trademark and the
intent to benef it f inancially f rom the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark.
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Complainant has registered rights in the Mark,
among them the European Union Intellectual Property Of f ice (“EUIPO”) with Registration No. 017912377,
registered on January 9, 2019, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Of f ice (“UKIPO”) with Registration
No. ...The Respondent’s use of the top level domain “.shop” in the disputed domain name does not
suf f iciently distinguish the disputed domain name f rom the Complainant’s Marks.
The Respondent cannot claim the right to use the disputed domain name under fair use, since it includes the
Mark and the additional phrase “2025top” which creates a risk of implied af f iliation by suggesting to users
that the content and services and the disputed domain name contains an authorized or of f icial list of “top”
OnlyFans content creators for 2025.
...
2025-10-24 - Case Details
page 3
There are no exceptional circumstances within paragraph 5(f ) of the Rules to prevent the Panel f rom
determining the dispute based upon the Complaint, notwithstanding the failure of the Respondent to f ile a
Response. ...Although the addition of other terms here, letter “i” may bear on assessment of the second and third
elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such letter does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity
between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-02-12 - Case Details