We do no t intend to
commerc ial ize the domain; we wil l engage in non-p ro f it ac t iv it ies . ” […]
“We call for agreement and peaceful dispute resolution, but we are p repared f o r any scenario . ”
“Regarding your inquiry about our business with bicycle parts f rom Italy, it concerns cycling training,
training advice, organizing cycling trips, organizing a community with Italian partners, and promoting
the sport. ...We have waited with our activities because we do not want to start things before you of f icially
declare. Summer is approaching and it's time to start a plan, and for that we need to have a name and a website.
...
2024-06-26 - Case Details
The Complainant has the of f icial website “www.noelcowardtheatre.co.uk”.
The disputed domain name was registered on October 4, 2023.
...In the light of the foregoing, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name was registered and is being
used in bad faith; and therefore, to f ind that the Complaint fulf ills the paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2024-09-25 - Case Details
Complainant claims
Respondent agreed to return the Domain Name in exchange for a payment f rom Complainant of USD 1,015.
Complainant paid the demanded amount, but transfer of the Domain Name did not occur. ...WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
According, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in the Domain Name. ...
2024-11-01 - Case Details
Further, a domain name which consists of a common or intentional misspelling of a trademark is
considered by panels to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for purposes of the f irst element. WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.9.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...Under the second and third elements, panels will normally f ind that employing a misspelling of a
complainant’s mark signals an intention on the part of the respondent (typically corroborated by inf ringing
website content) to confuse users seeking or expecting the complainant. ...
2025-08-26 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <f ieldf isherslawyers.com> (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant
promotes its services through various means including f rom its website at “www.f ieldf isher.com”
(“Complainant’s Website”) and presently has more than 1,700 employees working in 26 of f ices.
...
2023-12-05 - Case Details
The Domain Names reproduce the Complainant’s
trademark in its entirety with the addition of the name of a country or of the two letters code dedicated to a
country. It is not suf f icient to prevent a f inding of confusing similarity.
page 3
The Complainant argues that the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
Domain Names. ...The composition of the 46 Domain Names carries a risk of implied af f iliation to the
Complainant. The Domain Names were also registered in order to prevent the Complainant f rom ref lecting
its well-known trademark in corresponding domain names. ...
2024-03-01 - Case Details
No. 018366106 of August 5, 2021;
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name f rance.eu> on September 21, 2023. The
same does not resolve to any active web page, but is used in an email address in order to send f raudulent
emails to the suppliers of the Complainant.
5. ...The Panel notes here that the disputed domain name is used to send f raudulent emails and
therefore, rights or legitimate interests cannot be conferred on the Respondent.
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms here, “travel solutions”, may bear on assessment of the second and third
elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity
between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2026-01-26 - Case Details
Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
The Panel f inds that the Complainant’s registrations establish its trademark rights. WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.2.1.
...Accordingly, the Panel concludes that the Complainant has proven
the f irst element: the Domain Names are confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights.
...
2025-06-30 - Case Details
page 2
4. Factual Background
The factual f indings pertinent to the Decision in this case are that:
(1) the Complainant is a French company, founded in 1996, which sells clothing, shoes and accessories
for women under the trademark SESSUN;
(2) the Complainant is the owner of , inter alia, United States Patent and Trademark Of f ice (“USPTO”)
Reg. ...The Panel f inds that the Complainant has satisf ied the third and f inal element of the Policy.
7. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2025-08-18 - Case Details
The Complainant also owns the domain name , which resolves to its web site at
“www.chevron.com,” f rom which it markets its business.
The Respondent registered the Domain Name on February 17, 2024, using a privacy service that is the
Registrant of the Domain Name, as disclosed by the Registrar, without any authorization f rom the
Complainant. ...Policy, paragraph 4(a).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
On the f irst element, the Panel f inds that the Complainant’s registrations establish its trademark rights.
...
2024-07-03 - Case Details
Phonetically, both “lyma” and “lima” may be pronounced in the same way.
The Panel f inds that the slight difference in spelling and the addition of the hyphen and word “tan” does not
prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and the Mark for the purposes of the
Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
Accordingly, the Panel f inds that the f irst element required under the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-04-04 - Case Details
No evidence has been presented to the Panel that might support a claim of Respondent’s rights or legitimate
interests in the disputed domain name, and Respondent has no license f rom, or other af f iliation with,
Complainant.
Therefore, the Panel finds that Complainant has provided suf f icient evidence for a prima facie case that
Respondent lacks “rights or legitimate interests” in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy, which
Respondent has not rebutted.
...case=D2022-2659
page 4
Accordingly, the Respondent’s passive holding of the disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of
bad faith.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has satisf ied the elements of paragraph (4)(a)(iii) of the Policy.
7. ...
2023-12-14 - Case Details
There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain
Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide of fering of goods or
services. The Panel f inds that the composition of the Domain Name, carries a risk of implied af f iliation with
the Complainant.
The Panel f inds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name in
accordance with paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2023-12-13 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, sections 1.7 and 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Further, panels have held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity here claimed as passing of f
constitutes bad faith. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.4. Having reviewed the record, the Panel f inds the
Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name constitutes bad faith under the Policy.
...
2025-09-03 - Case Details
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not
af f iliated with the Complainant, and there is no evidence to suggest that the Respondent has registered the
disputed domain name to advance legitimate interests or for the bona f ide of fering of legitimate goods or
services.
...In addition, in view of section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, the current
inactive state of the disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of
passive holding.
Accordingly, the Panel f inds that the Complainant has satisf ied paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.
7. ...
2025-06-23 - Case Details
The Panel f inds also that the composition of the Domain Name signals the Respondent’s intention of taking
unfair advantage of the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant as
to the origin or af f iliation of the website at the dispute domain name.
The Panel f inds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name in
accordance with paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2025-06-20 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the addition of the term “accounts” does not prevent a f inding of
confusing similarity with the Complainant’s FACEBOOK trademark, which remains clearly recognizable in the
disputed domain name.
...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-12-16 - Case Details
IQOS is a controlled heating device into which
specially designed tobacco sticks under the brand names “HEETS”, “HeatSticks” or “TEREA” are inserted
and heated to generate a f lavourful nicotine-containing aerosol (together “the IQOS System”). IQOS was
f irst launched by PMI group in 2014. ...The Website furthermore creates the false impression that Complainant has of f icially introduced the IQOS
System into the Iranian market.
The Panel f inds that these circumstances do not confer upon Respondent any rights or legitimate interests in
respect of the Domain Name.
...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
While the addition of other terms “hr-” may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel
f inds the addition of such terms do not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain
name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2023-12-15 - Case Details