Nokiagirls.com a.k.a IBCC,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0102). Moreover, “[p]revious [WIPO] panels have had no hesitation, in light of the undoubted worldwide reputation of the trademarks PLAYBOY and PLAYMATE, in finding that similar domain names are confusingly similar to the Playboy Marks.” ...
2012-05-04 - Case Details
Even if the argument of laches has not been raised by the Respondent (who did not participate in these proceedings), the Panel thinks of relevance to note from the outset that “[p]anels have recognized that the doctrine or defense of laches as such does not generally apply under the UDRP, and that delay (by reference to the time of the relevant registration of the disputed domain name) in bringing a complaint does not of itself prevent a complainant from filing under the UDRP, or from being able to succeed under the UDRP, where a complainant can establish a case on the merits under the requisite three elements”. ...
2012-04-24 - Case Details
Use that intentionally trades on the fame and reputation of a third-party trademark in order to generate revenue does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (see, inter alia, Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847). The Respondent’s activities in this case do not, in the Panel’s view, amount to bona fide commercial use. ...
2011-10-06 - Case Details
Texas International Property Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1415; Madonna Ciccone p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
Therefore, the Panel concludes that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2011-09-30 - Case Details
The Complaint was notified to the Respondent by sending emails to its disclosed email address, also to
“p----r@directvenespanol.com”, and to PrivacyProtect.org. The Complaint could not be delivered by courier owing to an incomplete address having been provided by the registrant. ...
2011-09-23 - Case Details
Furthermore, the substitution of the initial letter “p”’ for “f” in one disputed domain name, and the substitution of the initial letters “fil” for the word “full” in the other, fail to distinguish those disputed domain names from the Complainant’s mark to any relevant degree. ...
2011-09-02 - Case Details
Richi Industry S. r. l.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1206; Utensilerie Associate S. p. A. v. C & M,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0159; and Shaw Industries Group Inc., Columbia Insurance Company v. ...
2012-03-05 - Case Details
Complainant has the burden to prove each of these elements by a preponderance of the evidence. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
For the reasons discussed below, Complainant has not satisfied its burden, and thus this Panel declines to order the transfer of the Domain Name.
...
2012-06-20 - Case Details
D2012-1249 for the domain name ; International Bancshares Corporation v P-GTG1502 / G Domains / Galib Gahramanov, NAF Claim No. 1407423 for the domain name ; Transamerica Corporation v G Domains / Director Galib Gahramanov, NAF Claim No. 1433703 for the domain name ; and Baylor University v G Domains c/o Director Galib Gahramanov, NAF Claim No. 1442941 for the domain name ).
5. ...
2012-08-31 - Case Details
D2006-0006 (pay-per-click landing page not legitimate where ads are keyed to the trademark value of the domain name); Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[U]se which intentionally trades on the fame of another cannot constitute a "bona fide” offering of goods and services.”).
...
2012-07-12 - Case Details
Alex Tsypkin,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0946; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
The Panel also finds that the Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant and its rights in the ZIPPO mark because the Complainant sent a cease and desist letter to the Respondent on September 20, 2011, informing the Respondent of the Complainant’s rights in the ZIPPO mark and requesting the Respondent to cease all unauthorised activities, including offering for sale ZIPPO lighters which have had unauthorised engravings, artwork and/or badges applied to them. ...
2012-06-12 - Case Details
“The issue is not whether confusion is likely in the trademark sense (that is, confusion as to source based on the domain name and its use in connection with a website), but rather, whether the domain name, standing alone, is sufficiently similar to the trademark to justify moving on to other elements of a claim for cybersquatting.” F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323. “Each case must be judged on its own facts, and the assessment will always depend on the specific mark and the specific domain name.” ...
2012-08-22 - Case Details
Texas International Property Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1415; Madonna Ciccone p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
Therefore, the Panel concludes that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2011-09-16 - Case Details
See, e.g., The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. v. Darryl Pope,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0593 (“[t]he [p]anel is free to infer that [r]espondent is likely receiving some pecuniary benefit . . . in consideration of directing traffic to that site” (citing COMSAT Corporation v. ...
2010-10-04 - Case Details
Richi Industry S.r.l.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1206; Utensilerie Associate S. p. A. v. C & M,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0159; Shaw Industries Group Inc., Columbia Insurance Company v. Wan-Fu China, Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-12-01 - Case Details
Zhijun Guo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0184; LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2010-11-25 - Case Details
The mark LATIMES.COM is in use by the Complainant for “[p]roviding online copies of newspapers for general circulation, via an on-line global network.” The mark LOS ANGELES TIMES is registered and in use by Complainant for newspapers. ...
2010-11-08 - Case Details
Alex Tsypkin,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0946; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
The Panel accordingly finds that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy in respect of the Domain Name.
...
2010-11-04 - Case Details
On November 3, 2010, the Center received an email communication from the Respondent Siddharth Shah stating: “[p]lease note that on 29th October 2010 we have shut down our domain “www.pricelinetravelhouse.com”.
...
2010-12-09 - Case Details
D2007-0369 (finding the domain name confusingly similar to
the trademark ADIPEX-P because they are “pronounced in the same way despite the removal of the dash”). As stated in Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. d/b/a Condé Nast Publications v. ...
2010-12-08 - Case Details