The Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed
Domain Names indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on
the name and reputation of the Complainant and its BOX Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v.
Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for
Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and
mark for commercial gain”).
...
2023-03-30 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant asserts to operate or have investments in 24 countries in North America, Central and
South America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region, counting with approximately 11,000 people worldwide
and being a member of the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, having its common stock traded on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX.
...
2023-03-01 - Case Details
El
nombre de dominio en disputa se utiliza para alojar un sitio web que incumple los requisitos de la prueba de
Oki Data,2 ya que se hace pasar por la Demandante, sin incluir información sobre la falta de relación entre
las Partes y tratando de engañar a los consumidores.
1 Véanse, entre otras, IM Production v. 50448207 Qiang Pa [ . . . ] @live.com, 1290044 Q P [ . . . ] @live.com, Caso OMPI No.
D2012-0112; IM Production v. Ted Chen, Caso OMPI No. D2014-1486; IM Production v. yansheng zhang, GNAME.COM PTE. ...
2024-02-16 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests
affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna
Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; AB Electrolux v.
Handi Sofian, Service Electrolux Lampung, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-04-09 - Case Details
The Complainant is regularly listed in the Fortune 500 Companies rankings and is a member of the Standard
and Poor’s (S&P) 500 stock market index tracking.
Since 2004, the Complainant operates in the United States a free medication program called Gilead
Advancing Access.
...
2023-07-03 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests
af f iliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide of fering of goods or services (Madonna
Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; AB Electrolux v.
Handi Sofian, Service Electrolux Lampung, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel
refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere
registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising
typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an
unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.” ...
2023-05-23 - Case Details
The Respondents’
registration and use of the Disputed Domain Names indicate that such registration and use has been done
for the specific purpose of trading on and targeting the name and reputation of the Complainant. See
Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he
only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the
fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”). ...
2023-04-26 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
(particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous
or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.”
...
2023-09-29 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which
states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or
confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive
term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of
bad faith.” ...
2023-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent’s
registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use had been done for
the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its SCRIBD Mark. See
Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he
only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the
fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2023-08-31 - Case Details
Further, the Complainant is a member of Standard & Poor’s
(S&P) 500 Index, and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the
symbol EFX. ...
2023-08-24 - Case Details
Here, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name
indicates that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading upon and targeting
the name and reputation of the Complainant. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2024-02-14 - Case Details
As explained at section 3.1.4 of the
WIPO Overview 3.0. “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is
identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a
descriptive term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a
presumption of bad faith”. ...
2024-03-01 - Case Details
Here, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name
indicates that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading upon and targeting
the name and reputation of the Complainant. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2024-07-18 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
(particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous
or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith”.
...
2024-07-17 - Case Details
On this basis, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which
states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or
confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive
term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of
bad faith”. ...
2024-07-15 - Case Details
Notably, the Complainant asserts to operate or have investments in 24 countries in North America, Central
and South America, Europe, and the Asia Pacif ic region, counting with approximately 11,000 people
worldwide and being a member of the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, having its common stock traded
on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX.
...
2024-07-09 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which
states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or
confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive
term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of
bad faith.” ...
2024-06-28 - Case Details
Section 3.2.1 of WIPO Overview 3.0 provides that “[p]articular circumstances panels may take into account
in assessing whether the respondent’s registration of a domain name is in bad faith include: (i) the nature of
the domain name (e.g., a typo of a widely-known mark, or a domain name incorporating the complainant’s
mark plus an additional term such as a descriptive or geographic term, or one that corresponds to the
complainant’s area of activity or natural zone of expansion) [...] ...
2024-05-10 - Case Details