Rätten finns fastslagen ibland annat FN:s konvention om medborgerliga och politiska rättigheter (Art. 19), Europakonventionen (Art. 10) och i den svenska Regeringsformen (2:1 p 1):
“Varje medborgare är gentemot det allmänna tillförsäkrad yttrandefrihet, dvs. frihet att i tal, skrift eller bild eller på annat sätt meddela upplysningar samt uttrycka tankar, åsikter och känslor”.
...
2009-06-15 - Case Details
Reference is inter alia made to Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, and Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. ...
2009-10-22 - Case Details
On January 1, 2009, Respondent replied by email again demanding that Complainants “[p]urchase the domain at $500 or go to the UDRP”. Complainants then initiated the present proceedings to obtain the transfer of the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2011-02-21 - Case Details
En décider autrement reviendrait à admettre que la violation intentionnelle par un défendeur des droits d'un requérant peut constituer un intérêt légitime, ce qui serait à l'évidence contraire au but poursuivi par les Principes directeurs (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
Litige OMPI No. D2000-0847). C'est également le lieu de rappeler que, conformément à l'opinion majoritaire des Commissions administratives, les discussions ayant eu lieu entre les parties après que l'attention du défendeur a été attirée sur l'existence des droits du requérant peut être exploitée pour démontrer sa mauvaise foi suivant les circonstances du cas d'espèce, ne serait-ce qu'en raison du fait que le défendeur attend fréquemment d'avoir été avisé du litige par le requérant avant de se manifester, comme il en est allé en l'espèce (Synthèse, chiffre 3.6, qui cite à cet égard CBS Broadcasting, Inc. v. ...
2010-04-27 - Case Details
By visiting the Internet site linked to the disputed domain name, the Panel also recognized that the Respondent uses the word “posta” (with an optically highlighted P) as a title in connection with the word “gazete”, which means nothing else than “newspaper” in the English language.
...
2010-04-08 - Case Details
La Demandada
La Demandada parece ser una diseñadora gráfica que presta sus servicios profesionales a través de una sociedad llamada A. P. S.L. y que, de acuerdo con la información incluida en su página web corporativa, se especializa en el diseño y ejecución de proyectos de presencia y posicionamiento corporativo en Internet.
...
2010-08-24 - Case Details
Lloyds America Indemnity Corporation,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1327, and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847. In the latter regard, the Panel has noted the Respondent's failure to provide actual evidence of its claimed mark, as well as the fact that the Respondent's claimed mark is not only identical to the Complainant's pre-existing mark, but that the Respondent's present use of the disputed domain name seems calculated to trade off confusion with the Complainant's widely known CHIPPENDALES mark. ...
2010-02-15 - Case Details
On the other hand, use which intentionally trades on the fame of another cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
The Respondent has exhibited a typewritten and unsigned copy of what appears to be a letter dated March 31, 2008 to a publisher, proposing that it publish a book Cooking with Red Bull. ...
2010-04-28 - Case Details
In addition, given the extensive and worldwide reputation of the NESTLÉ trademark and the presence of Complainant in the Australia and China, as determined by the documentary evidence and contentions submitted, the Panel sees no evidence of a good faith registration, nor can the Panel find any explanation, other than bad faith in the reproduction of Complainant’s trademark in the disputed domain name. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847. Such circumstance is further evidence of registration of a domain name in bad faith under paragraph 4(b) of the Policy.
...
2011-01-24 - Case Details
Selon les critères dégagés par les juridictions françaises, “pour l’appréciation de la renommée, (…) doivent être prises en compte notamment la part de marché occupée par la marque, l’intensité de son exploitation, son étendue géographique, la durée de son usage, l’importance des investissements auxquels elle donne lieu” (Cour d’appel de Paris, 18 mai 2001, PIBD 2001, III, p.576).
Les pièces communiquées par le Requérant pour attester de la renommée revendiquée sont des articles de la presse anglaise de 2001 qui concernent la phase de pré-commercialisation du médicament CIALIS par le Requérant en Europe, à savoir notamment les phases d’obtention d’AMM et de promotion de l’introduction sur le marché de ce médicament. ...
2010-12-23 - Case Details
Richi Industry S. r. l.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1206; Utensilerie Associate S. p. A. v. C & M,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0159; Shaw Industries Group Inc., Columbia Insurance Company v. Wan-Fu China, Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-10-22 - Case Details
On September 16, 2005, Complainant sent a cease-and-desist letter to the new registrant (Tyson Jonson) at the address indicated by the latter which is the same as the Respondent’s (Attachment P). On September 20, Tyson Jonson replied offering the Domain Name for sale on the same conditions as those offered by Respondent (for the sum of 1,500 United States dollars, transaction to be organised via escrow.com) underlying how costly UDRP proceedings would be (Attachment Q).
...
2005-12-07 - Case Details
IRG Coins and Ink Source, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0090; Strålfors AB v. P D S AB,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0112; InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. Tenenbaum Ofer,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0075.
...
2016-08-23 - Case Details
Factual Background
CenturyLink Intellectual Property, LLC (“CenturyLink”) is an S&P 500 company and is included among the Fortune 500 list of America’s largest corporations. It provides data, voice and managed services in local, national and select international markets through its fiber optic network and multiple data centers for businesses and consumers. ...
2017-03-16 - Case Details
The disputed domain name consists of an obvious misspelling of Complainant’s WHATSAPP trademark (given the omission of the “h” and the replacement of the “pp” by a “b”, most likely as “p” is pronounced as “b” in Arabic). Prior panels deciding under the Policy have held that an obvious or common misspelling of a trademark is insufficient to distinguish a domain name from a complainant’s trademark and is intended to cause confusion amongst Internet users. ...
2016-08-29 - Case Details
To conclude otherwise would mean that a Respondent could rely on intentional infringement to demonstrate a legitimate interest, an interpretation which is obviously contrary to the intent of the Policy." Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / Madonna.com,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2016-11-17 - Case Details
Obwohl der vorliegende Fall nicht der "Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP") unterliegt, möchte der Experte darauf hinweisen, dass sich die Situation im gegenwärtigen Fall von jener im Madonna-Fall (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-847) unterscheidet, da es dem Beschwerdegegner im letzteren nicht gelang, eine glaubwürdige Erklärung für seine Wahl des Namens "Madonna" als Domainname zu erbringen. ...
2016-02-24 - Case Details
Such use cannot possibly be considered a bona fide offering of goods or services as the Respondent is trading on the Complainant’s goodwill to attract internet users to his website/s by creating a false association with the Complainant. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“use which intentionally trades on the fame of another cannot constitute a ‘bona fide’ offering of goods or services”), see also Microsoft Corporation v. ...
2016-02-04 - Case Details
Complainant further argues that when a Disputed Domain Name incorporates an entire trademark with only the addition of a common symbol in the form of a hyphen, it is still confusingly similar to the trademark because the hyphen is non-distinctive. See, Hoffmann-LaRoche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc. v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2017-06-06 - Case Details
The Complainant is the proprietor of the following trademark registrations:
- Switzerland trademark number P-513796 for a combined mark including a device and the words “Bio check up CONCERNED BY YOUR HEALTH”, registered on August 27, 2003 in Classes 35, 42 and 44;
- International trademark number 816486 for a combined mark including a device and the words “Bio check up CONCERNED BY YOUR HEALTH”, registered on December 23, 2003 in Classes 35, 42 and 44 and designating Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Monaco and the Russian Federation;
- European Union Trade Mark number 009855727 for a combined trademark including the words “BioCheck Up” registered on March 27, 2013 with a filing date of March 31, 2011 in Class 44;
- France trademark number 4035524 for a combined trademark including the words “BioCheck Up” registered on August 1, 2014 with a filing date of March 31, 2011 in Class 44;
- Switzerland trademark number 618595 for a combined trademark including the words “BioCheck Up” registered on August 22, 2011 with a filing date of February 28, 2011 in Classes 35, 41, 42 and 44.
...
2017-07-03 - Case Details