In relation to the Domain Name (an extra “c” is presented in the word “aircraft”):
On November 15, 2021, Respondent impersonated an employee and assistant to a senior executive at
Complainant by using the email address […]@insuredairccraft.com to contact one of Complainant’s clients
stating “[p]lease find attached wire instructions”, in an attempt to fraudulently divert funds to Respondent’s
bank account. ...
2022-08-19 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is associated with a
website which features the Complainant’s PUBLIX trademark, the Complainant’s circular green lowercase “p”
logo, and the Complainant’s typical website look and feel. It invites Internet users to check the balance on
the Complainant’s gift cards and to download files from another website, and requests the Complainant’s
employees to log into their personal employee account via a dedicated login facility. ...
2022-05-04 - Case Details
The Parties
Complainant is Business Debt Solutions, Inc., United States of America (“U.S.” or “United States”),
represented by Vedder Price P. C., United States of America.
Respondent is Domains by Proxy, LLC, U.S. / Francisco Mercado, U.S.
2. ...
2022-05-03 - Case Details
As explained at section 3.1.4 of the WIPO Overview 3.0. “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous or widely-known trade mark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith”. ...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
The disputed domain names no. 2, 11, 18, and 27 incorporate the figure “500” and the letter “p”.
The disputed domain name no. 25 incorporates the figure “500” in combination with the term “trades”.
...
2022-03-28 - Case Details
Section 3.5 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states that “[p]articularly with respect to ‘automatically’ generated
pay-per-click links, panels have held that a respondent cannot disclaim responsibility for content appearing
on the website associated with its domain name (nor would such links ipso facto vest the respondent with
rights or legitimate interests)”. ...
2022-09-20 - Case Details
Wilson Pinheiro Jabur
Especialista
Data: 8 de outubro de 2021
Local: São Paulo, SP, Brasil
1 Convenção da União de Paris, segundo a revisão de Estocolmo, de 14/07/1967, promulgada pelo decreto nº 635, de 21/08/1992, e ratificada pelo decreto nº 1.263, de 10/10/1994.
2 https://registro.br/dominio/contrato/. Acesso em 06/10/2021,
3 V. p. ex., REsp 1755536/RN, Rel. Ministro PAULO DE TARSO SANSEVERINO, TERCEIRA TURMA, julgado em 23/02/2021, DJe 01/03/2021.
4 De acordo com o art. 22 do Regulamento, o NIC.br procederá à implementação desta decisão no décimo quinto dia útil após o recebimento da notificação da decisão. ...
2021-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondents’ registration and use of the Disputed Domain Names indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its OCULUS and QUEST trademarks. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2021-12-08 - Case Details
ICG,
WIPO Case No. D2005-1150, “the consensus view of UDRP [p]anelists is that a pattern of conduct can involve multiple UDRP cases with similar fact situations or a single case where the respondent has registered multiple domain names which are similar to known trademarks...” ...
2021-12-03 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
It is acknowledged that once the Panel finds a prima facie case is made by a complainant, the burden of production under the second element shifts to the respondent to come forward with relevant evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2021-02-18 - Case Details
To put this in the terms of the Respondent’s own language, the Panel quotes from the Respondent’s website: “We stand for the right to keep what we legally acquired and [p]lease make sure you understand.” In agreement with both those principles, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not entitled to keep this because the Domain Name was not in fact legally acquired.
...
2021-01-28 - Case Details
D2018-0387; and SAP SE v. Lakshmi Reddy Bhumireddy and P. Hareesh,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0396.
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark SKY HIGH. ...
2018-08-21 - Case Details
D2017-1268; SAP SE v. Lakshmi Reddy Bhumireddy and P. Hareesh,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0396; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Cameron Jackson,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-11-08 - Case Details
Aprovechar el reconocimiento de las marcas de la Promovente para atraer usuarios de Internet con el fin de obtener ganancias, no confiere derechos o intereses legítimos sobre dicho nombre de dominio en favor del Titular (ver, mutatis mutandi, Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
Caso OMPI No. D2000-0847, y Philipp Plein v. Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org / Norma Brandon, cheapphilippplein,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2017-11-17 - Case Details
In response to the written notification of the Complaint, an email was sent to the Center on August 2, 2017, from an employee of a business called "RightParks P/L trading as Partsheaven" located in the State of Victoria, Australia, which is the same area as the physical address details in the WhoIs record for the Respondent. ...
2017-09-19 - Case Details
The Respondent, on the other hand, claims that “[p]ursuant to a recent agreement among members of the Tabibi family, in June, 2017, [Alexander] Tabibi acquired the interests of Carlo and Antoinette [Tabibi], and thus became the sole shareholder and executive officer of the Respondent ZCapital Inc. while this Proceeding has been pending.” ...
2017-09-11 - Case Details
Complainant further argues that when a Disputed Domain Name incorporates an entire trademark with only the addition of a common word, it is still confusingly similar to the trademark as the addition of non-distinctive phrases does not eliminate the likelihood of confusion. See, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2018-05-09 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is Volkswagen AG of Wolfsburg, Germany, represented by Gołębiowska Krawczyk Roszkowski i Partnerzy Kancelaria Adwokacko-Radcowska Sp. p., Poland.
The Respondent is Identity Protection Service, Identity Protect Limited of Hayes, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”) / Andreas Born-Seiferle of Laufenburg, Germany.
2. ...
2018-07-04 - Case Details
PrivacyYes.com, Igor Spodin,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1568, ; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, ; Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter Plc v. ...
2018-11-15 - Case Details
See The Citation of Wikipedia in Judicial Opinions by Lee F. Peoples, 12 Yale J.L. and Tech. 1 (2009), p. 3.; for its part, “pedia” means ‘learning’ in Latin. See “www.quora.com/What-does-the-word-pedia-mean“...
2019-03-08 - Case Details