WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2018-1254 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION 2703203 Manitoba Inc. v. W P, The Cloud...States of America ("United States"). The Respondent is W P, The Cloud Corp of George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, Overseas Territory of the United...
2018-07-25 - Case Details
with an additional letter “p” and the country code Top-Level Domain “.eu”, which may be disregarded for the purposes of assessing confusing similarity...domain name in dispute consist of a mispelling of the Complainant’s SHOPSTYLE trademark. There is no plausible explanation for the double “P” other than...
2018-11-09 - Case Details
registration No. P-567101 for PESTALOZZI ATTORNEYS AT LAW, registered on January 23, 2008, in classes 16, 35, 36, 41 and 45; and - Swiss trademark registration...No. P-567103 for PESTALOZZI ATTORNEYS AT LAW, registered on January 23, 2008, in classes 16, 35, 36, 41 and 45. The disputed domain name was registered...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
proper, so the Complainant’s request for consolidation is granted. Paragraph 10(e) of the Rules states that a “[p]anel shall decide a request by a Party to...consolidate multiple domain name disputes in accordance with the Policy and these Rules”. Paragraph 10(c) of the Rules provides, in relevant part, that “the [p...
2023-05-23 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark IPSOS, as it consists of the same word “ipsos” written with two letters “p”, and is therefore a misspelling...disputed domain name is a misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark as it consists of the word “ipsos” written with two letters “p”. According to Section...
2023-04-03 - Case Details
Complainant’s PIXABAY trademark except that the letter “p” is replaced with an “o.” The Complainant contends that this is a case of typosquatting since these...PIXABAY. As for the disputed domain name, it is composed of the exact same letters as the Complainant’s mark, except that the letter “p” is replaced by the...
2022-11-08 - Case Details
proceeding by: Robert P. Haney, Esq., Covington & Burling, 1330 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019, U.S.A. The Respondent is: INTERNETCO CORP...develop the web site into a promotional site for the Complainant" (Complaint p.8). The Complainant rejected the Respondent�s offer of collaboration and...
2001-03-27 - Case Details
Paragraph 14(b) of the Rules (see e.g. WIPO Case Nos. D2000-0009, p. 6 or D2000-0867, p. 6). It is the Sole Panelist�s finding that the Complainant has...
2001-03-30 - Case Details
p. 3). - While the domain name has not been placed in use, Respondent subsequently has developed an e-commerce process management system and is...currently has no use at all for the domain name (Response p. 4). The Panel finds the Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in the domain name...
2001-06-19 - Case Details
the Rules (see e.g. Cases No. D2000-0009, p. 6 or D-2000-0867, p. 6). As a matter of fact and failing evidence to the contrary, the Complainant has not...
2001-01-22 - Case Details
tiene en España 56 sucursales abiertas al p�blico, y una en la Rep�blica de Argentina refiri�ndose estas cifras a fecha de presentaci�n de la Demanda. La...internacional. - Que, a consecuencia de todo lo anterior y en definitiva, se produce una evidente confusi�n en el p�blico respecto a las marcas de productos y...
2001-01-19 - Case Details
in Desenzano del Garda, Italy (Annex P). - that the Complainant attempted several times to contact the Respondent (Annex L, M, N, O) but Respondent...; Quixtar Investments, Inc. V Smithberger , D2000-0138 ). According to the Complainant's inquire, it appears that the Respondent lives in Italy (Annex P).The...
2001-06-05 - Case Details
Paragraph 14 (b) of the Rules (see e.g. WIPO Cases Nos. D2000-0009 , p. 6 or D2000-0867 , p. 6). It is the Sole Panelist�s finding that the Complainant has...
2001-06-18 - Case Details
all three of the disputed domain names link to pornographic websites (Complaint, p.7). For the purposes of this proceeding, then, the Panel agrees with...Alessandra also is known as Alessandra through the website at the domain name , but there is scant evidence to support this contention (Complaint p.7). The...
2001-07-16 - Case Details
appropriate pursuant to Paragraph 14 (b) of the Rules (see e.g. WIPO Cases Nos. D2000-0009 , p. 6 or D2000-0867 , p. 6). As pointed out by the Complainants and...
2001-07-27 - Case Details
pictures (Response, p.1). This Panel does not see the slightest indication of a legitimate trademark interest in this Response that would allow Respondent to...at one point in his Response (p.1), Respondent states: "Rollerblade the company has made no effort to acquire the from me or offer any restitution��.If...
2000-06-28 - Case Details
reflejar su marca en el correspondiente nombre de dominio y en su p�gina web es una circunstancia acreditativa de la mala fe del registro y el uso de la...demandada.." (p. 8 del escrito de demanda). La mala fe del demandado se deducir� de otros aspectos de su conducta, pero del registro en marzo de 2000, no...
2000-10-09 - Case Details
pesquisa de opinião p�blica conduzida pelo Instituto Gallup em 1996. Conforme esta pesquisa, a marca "TRAMONTINA" seria conhecida de 94 % da população adulta...ao p�blico em geral, contribu�ram decisivamente para o convencimento deste Painel. Uma pesquisa junto ao Orgão de Registro, Network Solutions, Inc...
2001-01-25 - Case Details
response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent�s default on May 21, 2003. The Center appointed Howard P. Knopf as the sole Panel in this matter on... Howard P. Knopf Sole Panelist Dated: June 18, 2003 1. Unregistered or common law trademarks may also form the basis of a Complaint. See MatchNet plc. v...
2003-07-01 - Case Details
agent of Respondent Dissertationdoctors.com and Dissertation-doctors.com. Complaint, p. 7. Complainant alleges that Respondent had not made any use of the...papers, dissertations and term papers for others who are willing to pay a set fee and who then turn the work in as their own." Complaint, p. 6. 5...
2003-07-10 - Case Details